Clinical significance of isolated mega cisterna magna

  • Etan Z. Zimmer
  • Lior Lowenstein
  • Moshe Bronshtein
  • Dorith Goldsher
  • Judith Aharon-Peretz
Original Article



The prevalence and clinical significance of isolated mega cisterna magna in both fetuses and adults is not yet well defined. It is therefore difficult to provide reliable parental counseling in cases of a fetal sonographic diagnosis of this anomaly. The aim of the present study was to, determine the cognitive profile of adults with isolated mega cisterna magna.


We reviewed 19,301 consecutive CT/MRI of the brain. Isolated mega cisterna magna was observed in 49 cases. A battery of neuropsychological tests was performed in 18 adults with this anomaly and in 18 controls who had no brain anomaly on CT/MRI.


Subjects with isolated mega cisterna magna had a lower performance on memory tasks [RAVLT saving score (0.8 ± 0.2 vs. 1.02 ± 0.2, P = 0.003)] and verbal fluency [phonemic fluency (9.4 ± 4.5 vs. 13.6 ± 5.3, P = 0.02), semantic fluency (19.8 ± 5.8 vs. 24.4 ± 7.5, P = 0.05)]. They did not differ from controls in regard to the Raven similarity tests indicating that this brain anomaly is not associated with impairment of general cognitive abilities.


Adults with isolated mega cisterna have an overall normal cognitive functioning but may score inferior to controls on some parameters of memory and verbal fluency. Although application of adult cases to the fetuses is not well established, this information might be of value in parental counseling in cases of a fetus with this anomaly.


Isolated mega cisterna magna Cognitive profile Prenatal counseling 


  1. 1.
    Bodensteiner JB, Gay CT, Marks WA, Hamza M, Schaefer GB (1988) Macro cisterna magna: a marker for maldevelopment of the brain? Pediatr Neurol 4(5):284–286PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pollak L, Klein C, Rabey JM, Schiffer J (1996) Posterior fossa lesions associated with neuropsychiatric symptomatology Int J Neurosci 87(3–4):119–126PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Haimovici JA, Doubilet PM, Benson CB, Frates MC (1997) Clinical significance of isolated enlargement of the cisterna magna (>10 mm) on prenatal sonography. J Ultrasound Med 16(11):731–734PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ek S, Anadakumar C, Wong YC, Chau TM, Gole LA, Malarvishy G (1998) Enlargement of cisterna magna as an indicator of chromosomal abnormalities in a low-risk Asian population. J Perinat Med 26(4):325–327PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Long A, Moran P, Robson S (2006) Outcome of fetal cerebral posterior fossa anomalies. Prenat Diagn 26(8):707–710PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    NW L (1996) Neuropsychological assessment, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Robinson AJ, Goldstein R (2007) The cisterna magna septa: vestigial remnants of Blake’s pouch and a potential new marker for normal development of the rhombencephalon. J Ultrasound Med 26(1):83–95PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Barkovich AJ, Kjos BO, Norman D, Edwards MS (1989) Revised classification of posterior fossa cysts and cystlike malformations based on the results of multiplanar MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 153(6):1289–1300PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zalel Y, Gilboa Y, Gabis L, Ben-Sira L, Hoffman C, Wiener Y et al (2006) Rotation of the vermis as a cause of enlarged cisterna magna on prenatal imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 27(5):490–493PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Etan Z. Zimmer
    • 1
  • Lior Lowenstein
    • 1
  • Moshe Bronshtein
    • 1
  • Dorith Goldsher
    • 2
  • Judith Aharon-Peretz
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics GynecologyRambam Medical CenterHaifaIsrael
  2. 2.Department of NeuroradiologyRambam Medical Center, Technion Faculty of MedicineHaifaIsrael
  3. 3.Department of Cognitive Neurology UnitsRambam Medical Center, Technion Faculty of MedicineHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations