Does water delivery affect pelvic floor? Ultrasound evaluation of perineal function
- First Online:
- 202 Downloads
The aim of the study is to analyse urethral mobility and excursion of the pubo-rectal angle, using perineal ultrasound, after normal vaginal delivery and water delivery.
Materials and methods
A total of 52 primiparous women were enrolled: 25 who had delivery in water (W Group), 27 who had delivery without using water (NW Group). Every woman underwent perineal ultrasound assessment at 6 months after having given birth. The following parameters were assessed: urethral mobility during Valsalva’s manoeuvre, movement of the pubo-rectal sling angle during contraction of the levator ani muscle.
Data obtained show that the urethral mobility during Valsalva’s manoeuvre is higher in the W Group (34.9°) in comparison to the NW Group (29.5°), without statistically significant differences. The excursion of the pubo-rectal sling angle resulted lower in the W Group (8.7°) than in the NW Group (11.0°), without statistically significant differences.
The present study found no statistically differences in pelvic floor, using perineal ultrasound, between water and “non-water” delivery.
KeywordsWater delivery Pelvic floor Perineal ultrasound Urethral mobility
- 10.MacLennan AH, Taylor AW, Wilson DH, Wilson D (2003) The prevalence of pelvic floor disorders and their relationship to gender, age, parity and mode of delivery. BJOG 110(1):88Google Scholar
- 15.Alderice F, Renfrew M, Marchant S, et al (1995) Labour and birth in water in England and Wales: Survey report. Br J Midwifery 3:375–382Google Scholar
- 21.Costantini S, Mistrangelo E, Francioso R, Valenzano Menada M, Risso D, Lantieri P (2005) Vaginal versus transabdominal hysterectomy: is mode of hysterectomy to influence pelvic statics or is pelvic statics to influence mode of hysterectomy? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 84(4):376–379PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Garland D, Jones (2000) Waterbirth: supporting practice with clinical audit. MIDIRS Midwifery Digest 10(3):333–336Google Scholar
- 23.Burns E (2001) Waterbirths. MIDIRS Midwifery Digest 11(3):S10–S13Google Scholar