Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

, Volume 275, Issue 4, pp 249–254 | Cite as

Spontaneous delivery is related to barometric pressure

  • Osamu Akutagawa
  • Hirotaka NishiEmail author
  • Keiichi Isaka
Original Article



Many studies have shown that changes in the weather affect health. In the field of obstetrics and gynecology, several events have been empirically shown to be related to the weather. Labor pain is controlled by the autonomic nervous system and various hormones, and is expected to be influenced by the weather and environmental changes. Several studies have been conducted on the relationship between delivery and barometric pressure, which shows constant changes with changes in weather, but there is no generally accepted view on this.


We conducted a retrospective study in our patients who had a spontaneous cephalic delivery in this hospital between January 1997 and December 2003, in order to determine whether low barometric pressure induces labor pains, premature rupture of the membranes, and delivery, and whether changes in barometric pressure affect delivery.


There was a significant increase in the number of deliveries and rupture of the membranes at low barometric pressure (P < 0.01), although there was no significant correlation between onset of labor and barometric pressure. This tendency was noted in both women with spontaneous rupture of the fetal membranes and those with premature rupture of the membranes (P < 0.01). On days with a larger change in barometric pressure, regardless of whether it was increasing or decreasing, the number of deliveries increased and the relationship was statistically significant (P < 0.01).


A causal relationship was noted between the number of rupture of the fetal membranes, delivery and barometric pressure, suggesting that low barometric pressure induces rupture of the fetal membranes and delivery.


Premature rupture of fetal membranes (PROM) Barometric pressure Spontaneous delivery 



We are indebted to Prof. J. Patrick Barron of the International Medical Communications Center of Tokyo Medical University for his review of this manuscript.


  1. 1.
    Polansky GH, Varner MW, O’Gorman T (1985) Premature rupture of the membranes and barometric pressure changes. J Reprod Med 30:189–191PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jongbloet P (1983) Menses and moon phases, ovulation and seasons, vitality and month of birth. Dev Med Child Neonatal 25:527–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Reinke R (1981) Headache and the weather. Ther Ggw 120:442–457PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Naeye RL (1982) Factors that predispose to premature rupture of the fetal membranes. Obstet Gynecol 60:93–98PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Milingos S, Messinis I, Diakomanolis D, Aravantinos D, Kaskarelis D (1978) Influence of meteorologic factors on premature rupture of the fetal membranes. Lancet 19:435–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Marks J, Church CK, Benrubi G (1983) Effects of barometric pressure and lunar phases on premature rupture of the membranes. J Reprod Med 28:485–488PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    May KL (1983) Meteorological and clinical factors in bronchial asthma. A clinical dilemma. Allergol Immunopathol 11:465–472Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    King EA, Flescher RG, Cohen SM (1997) Association between significant decrease in barometric pressure and onset of labor. J Nurse Midwifery 42:32–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Trail S, Borst LB (1971) Pearl Harbor plus 268 days. Am J Obstet Gynecol 109:1086–1088PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Trap R, Helm P, Lidegaard O, Helm E (1989) Premature rupture of the fetal membranes, the phases of the moon and barometer readings. Gynecol Obstet Invest 28:14–18PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Criss TB, Marcum JP (1981) A lunar effect on fertility. Soc Biol 28:75–80PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bazer FW, First NL (1983) Pregnancy and parturition. J Anim Sci 57:425–460PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Menaker W, Menaker A (1959) Lunar periodicity in human reproduction: a likely unit of biological time. Am J Obstet Gynecol 77:905–914PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Freeman AE (1984) Secondary traits: sire evaluation and the reproductive complex. J Daily Sci 67:449–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dvorak RA (1978) A note on the relationship between barometric pressure and calving incidence. Anim Reprod Sci 1:3–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Osamu Akutagawa
    • 1
  • Hirotaka Nishi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Keiichi Isaka
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyTokyo Medical University TokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations