Occupation and risk of cesarean section: study based on the perinatal survey of Baden-Württemberg, Germany
The aim of this study was to assess the current influence of educational attainment and occupation on maternal obstetrical risk associated with cesarean section under the conditions of an industrialized country and provision of universal coverage.
Materials and methods
The perinatal survey data 1998–2001 of the German state of Baden-Württemberg were studied comparing method of delivery for the different occupational categories raised in the survey and the influence of antenatal care utilization. For statistical analysis chi square test, Fisher’s exact test and chi square test for trends were used. Relative risks describe the risk for the exposed.
Cesarean section rate increased for all groups over the studied four years period. High rates of surgical deliveries were found for the categories “high salaried position” and “unskilled workers”. Housewives, the largest group of pregnant women in Baden-Württemberg, delivered significantly less often by cesarean section (75% vaginal deliveries) than women of all other groups (66% vaginal deliveries on the average). In case of low utilization of antenatal care (<5 checks) risk of cesarean section and rate of complications (as blood loss >1,000 ml, hysterectomy) associated with cesarean section are significantly higher.
Differences in an individual woman’s risk of having a cesarean section is, besides many other factors, associated with occupation. Antenatal care promotion should target the collective of unskilled workers, at special risk for insufficient use of prenatal care and high rate of cesarean delivery.
KeywordsPerinatal survey data Cesarean delivery Occupation Prenatal care
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the other members of the Perinatal Working Group Baden-Württemberg: Prof. Dr. med. Mickan, deputee of the Medical Doctors’ Chamber (Ärztekammer) Baden-Württemberg, Dr. med. Staudt-Grauer, deputee of the Medical Service of the Statutory Health Insurance (MDK) Baden-Württemberg, Prof. Dr. med. Simon und Dr. med. Roll, deputies of the Hospital Society Baden-Württemberg (Baden-Württembergische Krankenhausgesellschaft). We would like to thank Mrs. Hübsch and Mrs. Häderle, GeQiK, for assistance and support in statistics. No additional funding or support was necessary for this study.
- 2.Association of Maryland Hospitals and Health Systems (2003) Maryland Hospital Association Quality Indicator Project. List of performance measures. http://www.qiproject.org/TargetQuality/TQ1297.asp#Wiscosin
- 3.Beguin F (1996) Surveillance de la grossesse dans le cadre de la nouvelle LAMal. Arch Gynecol Obstet 259 [Suppl]:84–87Google Scholar
- 4.Bundesgeschäftsstelle für Qualitätssicherung (2003) http://www.bqs-online.de
- 7.Gissler M, Meriläinen J, Vuori E, Hemminki E (2002) Register based monitoring shows decreasing socioeconomic differences in Finnish perinatal health. Eur J Public Health 12 [Suppl]:57Google Scholar
- 12.National Health Service (NHS), Department of Health (2002) NHS Performance indicators: February 2002.http://www.doh.gov.uk/nhsperformanceindicators/2002/index.html
- 16.Ross CE, Wu C (1995) The links between education and health. Am Soc Rev 10:719–745Google Scholar
- 19.Tussing AD, Wojtowyez M (1992) The cesarean decision in New York State 1986: economic and noneconomic aspects. Med Care 30:520–540Google Scholar
- 20.Villar J, Baáqeel H, Piaggio G, Lumbiganon P, Miguel Belizan J, Farnot U, Al-Mazrou Y, Carroli G, Pinol A, Donner A, Langer A, Nigenda G, Mugford M, Fox-Rushby J, Hutton G, Bergsjo P, Bakketeig L, Berendes H, Garcia J, WHO Antenatal Care Trial Research Group (2001) WHO antenatal care randomised trial for the evaluation of a new model of routine antenatal care. Lancet 357:1551–1564PubMedGoogle Scholar