Advertisement

Archives of Dermatological Research

, Volume 310, Issue 9, pp 759–767 | Cite as

The investigation of the relationships of demodex density with inflammatory response and oxidative stress in rosacea

  • Tuğba Falay Gur
  • Aslı Vefa Erdemir
  • Mehmet Salih Gurel
  • Abdurrahim Kocyigit
  • Eray Metin Guler
  • Duygu Erdil
Original Paper
  • 72 Downloads

Abstract

The relationships of demodex density with systemic oxidative stress, inflammatory response, and clinical severity in rosacea are not clear. This study aimed to (a) analyze the levels of systemic oxidative stress, antioxidant capacity, inflammatory parameters, and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) in systemic circulation in patients with rosacea, (b) identify the relationship between mite density and both oxidative stress and inflammation, and (c) investigate the role of photoaging and sebum secretion in etiopathogenesis. Forty patients with rosacea and 40 age-, sex-, and skin phenotype-matched healthy volunteers were included in the study. Clinical disease severity of the patients was determined. Sebum levels were measured in both the groups, and photoaging was evaluated. Reflectance confocal microscopy was used to calculate demodex density. Serum total antioxidant capacity (TAC), total oxidant capacity (TOC), myeloperoxidase (MPO), MMP-1, MMP-9, arylesterase (ARES), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), paraoxonase-1 (PON-1), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) levels were also analyzed. The patients with rosacea had significantly higher serum TOC and lower TAC levels (p < 0.001). The serum ARES and PON-1 levels were significantly lower (p = 0.045 and p < 0.001, respectively); however, the serum levels of MMP-1, MMP-9, IL-1β and MPO were higher in the patient group. Demodex parameters were higher in the patient group compared to the control group. There was no significant correlation between the number of mites and disease severity. In addition, the number of mites was not correlated with the serum levels of TAC, TOC, OSI, MPO, MMP-1, MMP-9, ARES, PON-1, TNF-α, and IL-1β. However, sebum levels were directly proportional to the number of mites. Photoaging severity was similar between the patients and control subjects. The changing sebaceous microenvironment in rosacea leads to an increase in the number of demodex mites. However, increased demodex density does not alter disease severity, level of oxidative stress, or inflammation. Although none of the patients with rosacea had any underlying systemic disease, patients’ systemic oxidative stress and inflammation parameters were found high in systemic circulation. It is assumed that the patients with rosacea are more prone to systemic diseases.

Keywords

Demodex Inflammation Oxidative stress Photoaging Rosacea Sebum 

Notes

Funding

This research was supported by Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Education Planning and Coordination Unit.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

was obtained from Bezmialem University Clinical Research Ethics Committee and the study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed consent

A written informed consent was obtained from each participant.

References

  1. 1.
    Abram K, Silm H, Maaroos HI, Oona M (2010) Risk factors associated with rosacea. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 24:565–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bakar O, Demircay Z, Yuksel M, Haklar G, Sanisoglu Y (2007) The effect of azithromycin on reactive oxygen species in rosacea. Clin Exp Dermatol 32:197–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baz K, Cimen MY, Kokturk A, Aslan G, Ikizoglu G, Demirseren DD, Kanik A, Atik U (2004) Plasma reactive oxygen species activity and antioxidant potential levels in rosacea patients: correlation with seropositivity to Helicobacter pylori. Int J Dermatol 43:494–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Belli AA, Altun I (2017) Thickness of carotid intima and epicardial fat in rosacea: a cross-sectional study. An Bras Dermatol 92:820–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bonnar E, Eustace P, Powell FC (1993) The Demodex mite population in rosacea. J Am Acad Dermatol 28:443–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dosal JR, Rodriguez GL, Pezon CF, Li H, Keri JE (2014) Effect of tetracyclines on the development of vascular disease in veterans with acne or rosacea: a retrospective cohort study. J Invest Dermatol 134:2267–2269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Duman N, Ersoy Evans S, Atakan N (2014) Rosacea and cardiovascular risk factors: a case control study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 28:1165–1169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Forton F, Seys B (1993) Density of Demodex folliculorum in rosacea: a case-control study using standardized skin-surface biopsy. Br J Dermatol 128:650–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Forton F, Seys B, Marchal JL, Song AM (1998) Demodex folliculorum and topical treatment: acaricidal action evaluated by standardized skin surface biopsy. Br J Dermatol 138:461–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Georgala S, Katoulis AC, Kylafis GD, Koumantaki-Mathioudaki E, Georgala C, Aroni K (2001) Increased density of Demodex folliculorum and evidence of delayed hypersensitivity reaction in subjects with papulopustular rosacea. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 15:441–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gerber PA, Buhren BA, Steinhoff M, Homey B (2011) Rosacea: the cytokine and chemokine network. J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc. 15(1):40–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Holmes AD (2013) Potential role of microorganisms in the pathogenesis of rosacea. J Am Acad Dermatol 69:1025–1032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hua TC, Chung PI, Chen YJ, Wu LC, Chen YD, Hwang CY, Chu SY, Chen CC, Lee DD, Chang YT, Liu HN (2015) Cardiovascular comorbidities in patients with rosacea: a nationwide case-control study from Taiwan. J Am Acad Dermatol 73:249–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Isik B, Gurel MS, Erdemir AT, Kesmezacar O (2013) Development of skin aging scale by using dermoscopy. Skin Res Technol 19:69–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jarmuda S, O’Reilly N, Zaba R, Jakubowicz O, Szkaradkiewicz A, Kavanagh K (2012) Potential role of Demodex mites and bacteria in the induction of rosacea. J Med Microbiol 61:1504–1510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lacey N, Delaney S, Kavanagh K, Powell FC (2007) Mite-related bacterial antigens stimulate inflammatory cells in rosacea. Br J Dermatol 157:474–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lacey N, Kavanagh K, Tseng SC (2009) Under the lash: Demodex mites in human diseases. Biochem (Lond) 31(4):2–6Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lee Y, Kim H, Kim S, Shin MH, Kim YK, Kim KH, Chung JH (2009) Myeloid differentiation factor 88 regulates basal and UV-induced expressions of IL-6 and MMP-1 in human epidermal keratinocytes. J Invest Dermatol 129:460–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Longo C, Casari A, De Pace B, Simonazzi S, Mazzaglia G, Pellacani G (2013) Proposal for an in vivo histopathologic scoring system for skin aging by means of confocal microscopy. Skin Res Technol 19:e167–e173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    McAleer MA, Fitzpatrick P, Powell FC (2010) Papulopustular rosacea: prevalence and relationship to photodamage. J Am Acad Dermatol 63:33–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    McMillen TS, Heinecke JW, LeBoeuf RC (2005) Expression of human myeloperoxidase by macrophages promotes atherosclerosis in mice. Circulation 111:2798–2804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Moran EM, Foley R, Powell FC (2017) Demodex and rosacea revisited. Clin Dermatol 35:195–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ni Raghallaigh S, Bender K, Lacey N, Brennan L, Powell FC (2012) The fatty acid profile of the skin surface lipid layer in papulopustular rosacea. Br J Dermatol 166:279–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    O’Reilly N, Bergin D, Reeves EP, McElvaney NG, Kavanagh K (2012) Demodex-associated bacterial proteins induce neutrophil activation. Br J Dermatol 166:753–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Oztas MO, Balk M, Ogus E, Bozkurt M, Ogus IH, Ozer N (2003) The role of free oxygen radicals in the aetiopathogenesis of rosacea. Clin Exp Dermatol 28:188–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Porta Guardia CA (2015) D emodex folliculorum: its association with oily skin surface rather than rosacea lesions. Int J Dermatol 54:e14–e17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rainer BM, Fischer AH, Luz Felipe da Silva D, Kang S, Chien AL (2015) Rosacea is associated with chronic systemic diseases in a skin severity-dependent manner: results of a case-control study. J Am Acad Dermatol 73:604–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sattler EC, Maier T, Hoffmann VS, Hegyi J, Ruzicka T, Berking C (2012) Noninvasive in vivo detection and quantification of Demodex mites by confocal laser scanning microscopy. Br J Dermatol 167:1042–1047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sulk M, Seeliger S, Aubert J, Schwab VD, Cevikbas F, Rivier M, Nowak P, Voegel JJ, Buddenkotte J, Steinhoff M (2012) Distribution and expression of non-neuronal transient receptor potential (TRPV) ion channels in rosacea. J Invest Dermatol 132:1253–1262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Takci Z, Bilgili SG, Karadag AS, Kucukoglu ME, Selek S, Aslan M (2015) Decreased serum paraoxonase and arylesterase activities in patients with rosacea. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 29:367–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tisma VS, Basta-Juzbasic A, Jaganjac M, Brcic L, Dobric I, Lipozencic J, Tatzber F, Zarkovic N, Poljak-Blazi M (2009) Oxidative stress and ferritin expression in the skin of patients with rosacea. J Am Acad Dermatol 60:270–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Turgut Erdemir A, Gurel MS, Koku Aksu AE, Bilgin Karahalli F, Incel P, Kutlu Haytoglu NS, Falay T (2014) Reflectance confocal microscopy vs. standardized skin surface biopsy for measuring the density of Demodex mites. Skin Res Technol 20:435–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Vera N, Patel NU, Seminario-Vidal L (2018) Rosacea comorbidities. Dermatol Clin 36:115–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Verma RP, Hansch C (2007) Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs): chemical-biological functions and (Q)SARs. Bioorg Med Chem 15:2223–2268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wilkin J, Dahl M, Detmar M, Drake L, Liang MH, Odom R, Powell F (2004) Standard grading system for rosacea: report of the National Rosacea Society Expert Committee on the classification and staging of rosacea. J Am Acad Dermatol 50:907–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Dermatology, Sultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research HospitalHealth Science UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Dermatology, Göztepe Training and Research HospitalIstanbul Medeniyet UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  3. 3.Department of BiochemistryBezmialem Vakif University Medical SchoolIstanbulTurkey
  4. 4.Department of DermatologyAğrı State HospitalAğrıTurkey

Personalised recommendations