Transepidermal water loss in young and aged healthy humans: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- 1.2k Downloads
Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) is regarded as one of the most important parameters for characterizing skin barrier function but an agreed upon definition of what a “normal” TEWL is does not exist. In order to determine generalizable TEWL values for healthy adults, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. The databases MEDLINE and EMBASE and publication lists were screened. After full-text appraisal of 398 studies, 231 studies were excluded due to unclear or insufficient reporting. 167 studies providing data about 50 skin areas were included in the final data synthesis. Pooled sample sizes ranged from n = 5 for the left cheek and the left lower back to a maximum of n = 2,838 for the right midvolar forearm area. The lowest TEWL of 2.3 (95 % CI 1.9–2.7) g/m2/h was calculated for the breast skin, the highest TEWL of 44.0 (39.8–48.2) g/m2/h for the axilla. TEWL in individuals being 65 years and above was consistently lower compared to the group of 18- to 64-year-old individuals. The quality of reporting TEWL in humans should be increased in future studies.
KeywordsAdult Aged Dermatology Humans Meta-analysis
This research was supported by the Clinical Research Center for Hair and Skin Science, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
- 1.Agner T (1992) Noninvasive measuring methods for the investigation of irritant patch test reactions. A study of patients with hand eczema, atopic dermatitis and controls. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl 173:1–26Google Scholar
- 5.Berardesca E, Fluhr JW (2010) Corneocyte size and cell renewal: effects of aging and sex hormones. In: Farage MA, Miller KW, Maibach HI (eds) Textbook of Aging Skin. Springer, Berlin, pp 271–275Google Scholar
- 13.Dharmarajan TS (2008) Aging and the skin: the geriatrician’s perspective. In: Norman R (ed) Diagnosis of Aging Skin Diseases. Springer, London, pp 5–10Google Scholar
- 26.Machado M, Hadgraft J, Lane ME (2010) Assessment of the variation of skin barrier function with anatomic site, age, gender and ethnicity. Int J Cosmet Sci. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2494.2010.00587.x
- 28.Mayrovitz HN, Bernal M, Brlit F, Desfor R (2012) Biophysical measures of skin tissue water: variations within and among anatomical sites and correlations between measures. Skin Res Technol. doi: 10.1111/srt.12000
- 31.Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gotzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, Elbourne D, Egger M, Altman DG (2010) CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Clin Epidemiol 63(8):e1–e37. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.004 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Panisset F, Treffel P, Faivre B, Lecomte PB, Agache P (1992) Transepidermal water loss related to volar forearm sites in humans. Acta Derm Venereol 72(1):4–5Google Scholar
- 40.Shlivko IL, Petrova GA, Zor’kina MV, Tchekalkina OE, Firsova MS, Ellinsky DO, Agrba PD, Kamensky VA, Donchenko EV (2012) Complex assessment of age-specific morphofunctional features of skin of different anatomic localizations. Skin Res Technol. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2012.00613.x
- 41.Steiner M, Aikman-Green S, Prescott GJ, Dick FD (2011) Side-by-side comparison of an open-chamber (TM 300) and a closed-chamber (Vapometer(™)) transepidermal water loss meter. Skin Res Technol. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2011.00509.x