Archives of Dermatological Research

, Volume 304, Issue 5, pp 407–412 | Cite as

DNA damage after acute exposure of mice skin to physiological doses of UVB and UVA light

  • Alena Rajnochová SvobodováEmail author
  • Adéla Galandáková
  • Jarmila Šianská
  • Dalibor Doležal
  • Radka Lichnovská
  • Jitka Ulrichová
  • Jitka Vostálová
Short Communication


Solar ultraviolet (UV) radiation is an important risk factor in skin carcinogenesis. This has been attributed mainly to the UVB waveband because the high-energetic photons are capable of interacting with DNA and inducing DNA damage. Recently, UVA light has also gained increasing interest in relation to DNA alteration. Although UVA photons are less energetic than UVB, they comprise a major fraction of sunlight UV radiation and penetrate deep into the skin. The study was carried out to compare the acute effects of UVA and UVB light on SKH-1 mice in relation to DNA damage and associated parameters. Mice were exposed to UVA (10 and 20 J/cm2) or UVB (200 and 800 mJ/cm2) radiation. The number of DNA single-strand breaks (SSB) in lymphocytes, amount of phosphorylated histone H2AX (gamma-H2AX) and apoptosis or DNA fragmentation (TUNEL-positive cells) in skin sections and level of gamma-H2AX, activated caspase-3 and phosphorylated p53 in skin were evaluated after 4 and 24 h. SSB analyzed by alkaline comet assay were found to be 4 and 24 h following UVB and UVA treatment, respectively. TUNEL and gamma-H2AX-positive cell were observed only in UVB exposed animals at both time intervals. The level of activated caspase-3 and phospho-p53 was increased 24 h after UVA and UVB radiation and was more apparent in UVB treated mice. The results indicate that the mechanism of DNA damage caused by acute UVA exposure includes formation of SSB (oxidative damage), but not double-strand breaks.


SKH-1 mice Solar radiation Single-strand breaks DNA fragmentation Gamma-H2AX p53 



This work was supported by the grants 303/07/P314, 303/09/H048 and MSM 6198959216. We thank to Naděžda Peňáková for the assistance during sample collection and Eva Nezhybová and Eva Kašpárková for the assistance during histological analyses.

Supplementary material

403_2012_1212_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (68 kb)
Fig. S1 (PDF 68 kb)
403_2012_1212_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (14 kb)
Table S2 (PDF 13 kb)


  1. 1.
    Barnes L, Dumas M, Juan M, Noblesse E, Tesniere A, Schnebert S, Guillot B, Molès JP (2010) GammaH2AX, an accurate marker that analyzes UV genotoxic effects on human keratinocytes and on human skin. Photochem Photobiol 86:933–941PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Burren R, Scaletta C, Frenk E, Panizzon RG, Applegate LA (1998) Sunlight and carcinogenesis: expression of p53 and pyrimidine dimers in human skin following UVA I, UVA I + II and solar simulating radiations. Int J Cancer 76:201–206PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Collins AR (2009) Investigating oxidative DNA damage and its repair using the comet assay. Mutat Res 681:24–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Erden Inal M, Kahraman A (2000) The protective effect of flavonol quercetin against ultraviolet a induced oxidative stress in rats. Toxicology 154:21–29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hasegawa T, Kaneko F, Niwa Y (1992) Changes in lipid peroxide levels and activity of reactive oxygen scavenging enzymes in skin, serum and liver following UVB irradiation in mice. Life Sci 50:1893–1903PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jiang S, Liu XM, Dai X, Zhou Q, Lei TC, Beermann F, Wakamatsu K, Xu SZ (2010) Regulation of DHICA-mediated antioxidation by dopachrome tautomerase: implication for skin photoprotection against UVA radiation. Free Radic Biol Med 48:1144–1151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kahraman A, Inal ME (2002) Protective effects of quercetin on ultraviolet A light-induced oxidative stress in the blood of rat. J Appl Toxicol 22:303–309PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kawagishi N, Hashimoto Y, Takahashi H, Ishida-Yamamoto A, Iizuka H (1998) Epidermal cell kinetics of pig skin in vivo following UVB irradiation: apoptosis induced by UVB is enhanced in hyperproliferative skin condition. J Dermatol Sci 18:43–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lavker R, Kaidbey K (1997) The spectral dependence for UVA-induced cumulative damage in human skin. J Invest Dermatol 108:17–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lu YP, Lou YR, Yen P, Mitchell D, Huang MT, Conney AH (1999) Time course for early adaptive responses to ultraviolet B light in the epidermis of SKH-1 mice. Cancer Res 59:4591–4602PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mouret S, Baudouin C, Charveron M, Favier A, Cadet J, Douki T (2006) Cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers are predominant DNA lesions in whole human skin exposed to UVA radiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:13765–13770PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mulero M, Romeu M, Giralt M, Folch J, Nogués MR, Fortuño A, Sureda FX, Linares V, Cabré M, Paternáin JL, Mallol J (2006) Oxidative stress-related markers and langerhans cells in a hairless rat model exposed to UV radiation. J Toxicol Environ Health A 69:1371–1385PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rizzo JL, Dunn J, Rees A, Rünger TM (2011) No formation of DNA double-strand breaks and no activation of recombination repair with UVA. J Invest Dermatol 131:1139–1148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rübe CE, Grudzenski S, Kühne M, Dong X, Rief N, Löbrich M, Rübe C (2008) DNA double-strand break repair of blood lymphocytes and normal tissues analysed in a preclinical mouse model: implications for radiosensitivity testing. Clin Cancer Res 14:6546–6555PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Svobodová A, Vostálová J (2010) Solar radiation induced skin damage: review of protective and preventive options. Int J Radiat Biol 86:999–1030PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Svobodová AR, Galandáková A, Šianská J, Doležal D, Ulrichová J, Vostálová J (2011) Acute exposure to solar simulated ultraviolet radiation affects oxidative stress-related biomarkers in skin, liver and blood of hairless mice. Biol Pharm Bull 34:471–479PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Takeuchi S, Zhang W, Wakamatsu K, Ito S, Hearing VJ, Kraemer KH, Brash DE (2004) Melanin acts as a potent UVB photosensitizer to cause an atypical mode of cell death in murine skin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:15076–15081PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vodička P, Koskinen M, Vodičková L, Štětina R, Šmerák P, Bárta I, Hemminki K (2001) DNA adducts, strand breaks and micronuclei in mice exposed to styrene by inhalation. Chem Biol Interact 137:213–227PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wischermann K, Popp S, Moshir S, Scharfetter-Kochanek K, Wlaschek M, de Gruijl F, Hartschuh W, Greinert R, Volkmer B, Faust A, Rapp A, Schmezer P, Boukamp P (2008) UVA radiation causes DNA strand breaks, chromosomal aberrations and tumorigenic transformation in HaCaT skin keratinocytes. Oncogene 27:4269–4280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alena Rajnochová Svobodová
    • 1
    Email author
  • Adéla Galandáková
    • 1
  • Jarmila Šianská
    • 1
  • Dalibor Doležal
    • 2
  • Radka Lichnovská
    • 3
  • Jitka Ulrichová
    • 1
  • Jitka Vostálová
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Medical Chemistry and Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine and DentistryPalacký UniversityOlomoucCzech Republic
  2. 2.Center for Laboratory Animals, Faculty of Medicine and DentistryPalacký UniversityOlomoucCzech Republic
  3. 3.Department of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine and DentistryPalacký UniversityOlomoucCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations