Archives of Dermatological Research

, Volume 304, Issue 7, pp 521–527 | Cite as

Protective effects of β-glucan against oxidative injury induced by 2.45-GHz electromagnetic radiation in the skin tissue of rats

  • Ali Murat Ceyhan
  • Vahide Baysal Akkaya
  • Şeyma Celik Güleçol
  • Betül Mermi Ceyhan
  • Fehmi Özgüner
  • WenChieh Chen
Original Paper

Abstract

In recent times, there is widespread use of 2.45-GHz irradiation-emitting devices in industrial, medical, military and domestic application. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of 2.45-GHz electromagnetic radiation (EMR) on the oxidant and antioxidant status of skin and to examine the possible protective effects of β-glucans against the oxidative injury. Thirty-two male Wistar albino rats were randomly divided into four equal groups: control; sham exposed; EMR; and EMR + β-glucan. A 2.45-GHz EMR emitted device from the experimental exposure was applied to the EMR group and EMR + β-glucan group for 60 min daily, respectively, for 4 weeks. β-glucan was administered via gavage at a dose of 50 mg/kg/day before each exposure to radiation in the treatment group. The activities of antioxidant enzymes, superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) and catalase (CAT), as well as the concentration of malondialdehyde (MDA) were measured in tissue homogenates of the skin. Exposure to 2.45-GHz EMR caused a significant increase in MDA levels and CAT activity, while the activities of SOD and GSH-Px decreased in skin tissues. Systemic β-glucan significantly reversed the elevation of MDA levels and the reduction of SOD activities. β-glucan treatment also slightly enhanced the activity of CAT and prevented the depletion of GSH-Px activity caused by EMR, but not statistically significantly. The present study demonstrated the role of oxidative mechanisms in EMR-induced skin tissue damages and that β-glucan could ameliorate oxidative skin injury via its antioxidant properties.

Keywords

Electromagnetic radiation β-Glucan Oxidative stress Skin Wireless devices 

References

  1. 1.
    Aebi Y (1984) Catalase in vitro. Methods Enzymol 105:121–126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aweda MA, Gbenebitse S, Meidinyo RO (2003) Effects of 2.45 GHz microwave exposures on the peroxidation status in Wistar rats. Niger Postgrad Med J 10:243–246PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ayata A, Mollaoglu H, Yilmaz HR, Akturk O, Ozguner F, Altuntas I (2004) Oxidative stress-mediated skin damage in an experimental mobile phone model can be prevented by melatonin. J Dermatol 31:878–883PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Behari J (2010) Biological responses of mobile phone frequency exposure. Indian J Exp Biol 48:959–981PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Draper HH, Hadley M (1990) Malondialdehyde determination as index of lipid peroxidation. Methods Enzymol 186:421–431PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eraslan G, Bilgili A, Akdogan M, Yarsan E, Essiz D, Altintas L (2007) Studies on antioxidant enzymes in mice exposed to pulsed electromagnetic fields. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 66:287–289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goraca A, Ciejka E, Piechota A (2010) Effects of extremely low frequency magnetic field on the parameters of oxidative stress in heart. J Physiol Pharmacol 61:333–338PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gu YH, Takagi Y, Nakamura T, Hasegawa T, Suzuki I, Oshima M, Tawaraya H, Niwano (2005) Enhancement of radioprotection and anti-tumor immunity by yeast-derived β-glucan in mice. J Med Food 8:154–158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gumral N, Naziroglu M, Koyu A, Ongel K, Celik O, Saygin M, Kahriman M, Caliskan S, Kayan M, Gencel O, Flores-Arce MF (2009) Effects of selenium and l-carnitine on oxidative stress in blood of rat induced by 2.45 GHz radiation from wireless devices. Biol Trace Elem Res 132:153–163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hashimoto T, Ohno N, Adachi Y, Yadomae (1997) Enhanced production of inducible nitric oxide synthase by β-glucans in mice. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 19:131–135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Huang TQ, Lee JS, Kim TH, Pack JK, Jang JJ, Seo JS (2005) Effect of radiofrequency radiation exposure on mouse skin tumorigenesis initiated by 7, dimethybenz[alpha]anthracene. Int J Radiat Biol 81:861–867PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ilhan A, Gurel A, Armutcu F, Kamisli S, Iraz M, Akyol O, Ozen S (2004) Ginkgo biloba prevents mobile phone-induced oxidative stress in rat brain. Clin Chim Acta 340:153–162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Imge EB, Kiliçoğlu B, Devrim E, Cetin R, Durak I (2010) Effects of mobile phone use on brain tissue from the rat and a possible protective role of vitamin C: a preliminary study. Int J Radiat Biol 86:1044–1049PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Irmak MK, Fadillioglu E, Gulec M, Erdogan H, Yagmurca M, Akyol O (2002) Effects of electromagnetic radiation from a cellular telephone on the oxidant and antioxidant levels in rabbits. Cell Biochem Funct 20:279–283PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Irmak MK, Oztas E, Yagmurca M, Fadillioglu E, Bakir B (2003) Effects of electromagnetic radiation from a cellular telephone on epidermal Merkel cells. J Cutan Pathol 30:135–138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kayali H, Ozdag MF, Kahraman S, Aydin A, Gonul E, Sayal A, Odabasi Z, Timurkaynak E (2005) The antioxidant effect of β-Glucan on oxidative stress status in experimental spinal cord injury in rats. Neurosurg Rev 28:298–302PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Keller U, Kümin A, Braun S, Werner S (2006) Reactive oxygen species and their detoxification in healing skin wounds. J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc 11:106–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kogan G (2000) (1–3, 1–6)-β-d-glucans of yeasts and fungi and their biological activity. Studies in Natural Products Chemistry 23:107–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kovacic P, Somanathan R (2010) Electromagnetic fields: mechanism, cell signaling, other bioprocesses, toxicity, radicals, antioxidants and beneficial effects. J Recept Signal Transduct Res 30:214–226PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Köylü H, Mollaoglu H, Ozguner F, Naziroglu M, Delibas N (2006) Melatonin modulates 900 Mhz microwave-induced lipid peroxidation changes in rat brain. Toxicol Ind Health 22:211–216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Koyu A, Ozguner F, Yilmaz H, Uz E, Cesur G, Ozcelik N (2009) The protective effect of caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) on oxidative stress in rat liver exposed to the 900 MHz electromagnetic field. Toxicol Ind Health 25:429–434PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kümin A, Huber C, Rülicke T, Wolf E, Werner S (2006) Peroxiredoxin 6 is a potent cytoprotective enzyme in the epidermis. Am J Pathol 169:1194–1205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ljungman AG, Leanderson P, Tagesson C (1998) (1–3)-β-d-glucan stimulates nitric oxide generation and cytokine mRNA expression in macrophages. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 5:273–281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ (1951) Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265–269PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mantovani MS, Bellini MF, Angeli JP, Oliveira RJ, Silva AF, Ribeiro LR (2008) β-Glucans in promoting health: prevention against mutation and cancer. Mutat Res 658:154–161PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Martínez-Sámano J, Torres-Durán PV, Juárez-Oropeza MA, Elías-Viñas D, Verdugo-Díaz L (2010) Effects of acute electromagnetic field exposure and movement restraint on antioxidant system in liver, heart, kidney and plasma of Wistar rats: a preliminary report. Int J Radiat Biol 86:1088–1094PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Naziroğlu M, Gümral N (2009) Modulator effects of L-carnitine and selenium on wireless devices (2.45 GHz)-induced oxidative stress and electroencephalography records in brain of rat. Int J Radiat Biol 85:680–689PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ozguner F, Altinbas A, Ozaydin M, Dogan A, Vural H, Kisioglu AN, Cesur G, Yildirim NG (2005) Mobile phone-induced myocardial oxidative stress: protection by a novel antioxidant agent caffeic acid phenethyl ester. Toxicol Ind Health 21:223–230PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ozguner F, Aydin G, Mollaoglu H, Gökalp O, Koyu A, Cesur G (2004) Prevention of mobile phone induced skin tissue changes by melatonin in rat: an experimental study. Toxicol Ind Health 20:133–139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ozguner F, Oktem F, Armagan A, Yilmaz R, Koyu A, Demirel R, Vural H, Uz E (2005) Comparative analysis of the protective effects of melatonin and caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) on mobile phone-induced renal impairment in rat. Mol Cell Biochem 276:31–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Paglia DE, Valentine WN (1967) Studies on the quantitative and qualitative characterization of erythrocyte glutathione peroxidase. J Lab Clin Med 70:158–169PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pourahmad J, Shaki F, Tanbakosazan F, Ghalandari R, Ettehadi HA, Dahaghin E (2011) Protective effects of fungal β-(1–3)-d-glucan against oxidative stress cytotoxicity induced by depleted uranium in isolated rat hepatocytes. Hum Exp Toxicol 30:173–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Repacholi MH (2001) Health risk from the use of mobile phones. Toxicol Lett 120:323–331PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Repacholi MH, Greenebaum B (1999) Interaction of static and extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields with living systems: health effects and research needs. Bioelectromagnetics 20:133–160PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sanchez S, Masuda H, Billaudel B, Haro E, Anane R, Lévêque P, Ruffie G, Lagroye I, Veyret B (2006) Effect of GSM-900 and -1800 signals on the skin of hairless rats II: 12-week chronic exposures. Int J Radiat Biol 82:675–680PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Santini MT, Rainaldi G, Indovina PL (2009) Cellular effects of extremely low frequency (ELF) electromagnetic fields. Int J Radiat Biol 85:294–313PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Schröder P, Krutmann J (2005) Environmental oxidative stress—environmental sources of ROS. In: Barcelo D, Konstianoy AG (eds) The handbook of environmental chemistry. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 19–31Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sener G, Sert G, Ozer Sehirli A, Arbak S, Uslu B, Gedik N, Ayanoglu-Dulger G (2006) Pressure ulcer-induced oxidative organ injury is ameliorated by β-glucan treatment in rats. Int Immunopharmacol 6:724–732PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sener G, Toklu H, Ercan F, Erkanli G (2005) Protective effect of β-glucan against oxidative organ injury in a rat model of sepsis. Int Immunopharmacol 5:1387–1396PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Shindo Y, Witt E, Han D, Tzeng B, Aziz T, Nguyen L, Packer L (1994) Recovery of antioxidants and reduction in lipid hydroperoxides in murine epidermis and dermis after acute ultraviolet radiation exposure. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 10:183–191PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Singh S, Kaur M, Khanduja KL, Mittal PK (1999) Exposure to 50 Hz electromagnetic field induces changes in the antioxidant defense system and inhibits lipid peroxidation in mice. Electro-and Magneto-biology 18:7–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sun Y, Oberley LW, Li Y (1988) A simple method for clinical assay of superoxide dismutase. Clin Chem 34:497–500PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Toklu HZ, Sener G, Jahovic N, Uslu B, Arbak S, Yeğen BC (2006) β-glucan protects against burn-induced oxidative organ damage in rats. Int Immunopharmacol 6:156–169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Trouba KJ, Hamadeh HK, Amin RP, Germolec DR (2002) Oxidative stress and its role in skin disease. Antioxid Redox Signal 4:665–673PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Türközer Z, Güler G, Seyhan N (2008) Effects of exposure to 50 Hz electric field at different strengths on oxidative stress and antioxidant enzyme activities in the brain tissue of guinea pigs. Int J Radiat Biol 84:581–590PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Wood ZA, Poole LB, Karplus PA (2003) Peroxiredoxin evolution and the regulation of hydrogen peroxide signaling. Science 300:650–653PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Zook BC, Simmens SJ (2006) The effects of pulsed 860 MHz radiofrequency radiation on the promotion of neurogenic tumors in rats. Radiat Res 165:608–615PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ali Murat Ceyhan
    • 1
  • Vahide Baysal Akkaya
    • 1
  • Şeyma Celik Güleçol
    • 1
  • Betül Mermi Ceyhan
    • 2
  • Fehmi Özgüner
    • 3
  • WenChieh Chen
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Dermatology, Medical FacultySuleyman Demirel UniversityCunur, IspartaTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Medical Biochemistry, Medical FacultySuleyman Demirel UniversityIspartaTurkey
  3. 3.Department of Physiology, Medical FacultySuleyman Demirel UniversityIspartaTurkey
  4. 4.Department of Dermatology and AllergyTechnische Universität MünchenMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations