Archives of Dermatological Research

, Volume 303, Issue 2, pp 117–124 | Cite as

Amputee skin condition: occlusion, stratum corneum hydration and free amino acid levels

  • Marty O. Visscher
  • Marisa Robinson
  • Benetta Fugit
  • Richard J. Rosenberg
  • Steven B. Hoath
  • R. Randall Wickett
Original Paper

Abstract

Patients with a prosthetic limb report negative skin effects, including irritation, rash and chaffing, which can lead to infection, discomfort and reduced wear time to significantly impact normal activities. The aims were to examine the epidermal integrity (transepidermal water loss, TEWL), stratum corneum (SC) hydration [moisture accumulation rate (MAT)], friction and biomechanical properties in active below the knee amputees and to determine the effects of an inert sock liner on skin condition. The liner reduced hydration, TEWL and friction and increased elasticity versus the amputee’s conventional skin care methods. Residual limb TEWL was increased and MAT was reduced versus the contralateral normal skin. In a second study, we hypothesized that complete occlusion would decrease free amino acids (FAA) and quantified them by high performance liquid chromatography in an adult volar forearm model. Occlusion with a water vapor impermeable wet dressing led to increased TEWL, erythema and dryness and reduced MAT versus normal skin, comparable to the results in the amputees. The FAA levels were significantly reduced for the occluded sites. The results suggest that residual limb occlusion in amputees may block the formation of FAA in the upper SC. Therapies based on replacement of water binding FAAs, may alleviate the consequences of long-term occlusion.

Keywords

Stratum corneum Amputee skin Amputee dermatitis TEWL Moisture accumulation rate Free amino acids Skin occlusion Skin hydration Skin barrier compromise 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Karen Munson, Diane Bare, and Cindy L. Lamerson, MD, for their technical expertise in conducting the skin assessments. The work was supported by a grant from W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc., a graduate student fellowship (Marisa Robinson) from the Society of Cosmetic Chemists and The Skin Sciences Institute of Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

403_2010_1111_MOESM1_ESM.doc (43 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 43 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Atrux-Tallau N, Romagny C, Padois K, Denis A, Haftek M, Falson F, Pirot F, Maibach HI (2010) Effects of glycerol on human skin damaged by acute sodium lauryl sulphate treatment. Arch Dermatol Res 302:435–441CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baars EC, Dijkstra PU, Geertzen JH (2008) Skin problems of the stump and hand function in lower limb amputees: a historic cohort study. Prosthet Orthot Int 32:179–185CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barrett JG, Scott IR (1983) Pyrrolidone carboxylic acid synthesis in guinea pig epidermis. J Invest Dermatol 81:122–124CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blank (1952) Factors which influence the water content of the stratum corneum. J Invest Dermatol 18(6):433–440PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bucks D, Guy R, Maibach HI (1991) Effects of occlusion. In: Bronaugh RL, Maibach HI (eds) In vitro percutaneous absorption: principles, fundamentals and applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 85–114Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carmaish JS, Harborow PRH, Hofman DA (1973) A hand-held friction meter. Br J Dermatol 89:33–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chapman SJ, Walsh A (1990) Desmosomes, corneosomes and desquamation. An ultrastructural study of adult pig epidermis. Arch Dermatol Res 282:304–310CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    DeLapp NW, Dieckman DK (1988) Gamma glutamyl peptidase: a novel enzyme from hairless mouse epidermis. J Invest Dermatol 90:490–494CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dover JS, Arndt KA, LeBoit PE, Robinson JK, Wintroub BU (1996) What diseases are caused by environmental exposure or physical trauma pocket guide to cutaneous medicine and surgery. W. B. Saunders, London, pp 774–775Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fluhr JW, Akengin A, Bornkessel A, Fuchs S, Praessler J, Norgauer J, Grieshaber R, Kleesz P, Elsner P (2005) Additive impairment of the barrier function by mechanical irritation, occlusion and sodium lauryl sulphate in vivo. Br J Dermatol 153:125–131CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fluhr JW, Darlenski R, Surber C (2008) Glycerol and the skin: holistic approach to its origin and functions. Br J Dermatol 159:23–34CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gerhardt LC, Strassle V, Lenz A, Spencer ND, Derler S (2008) Influence of epidermal hydration on the friction of human skin against textiles. J R Soc Interface 5:1317–1328CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Girbal-Neuhauser E, Durieux JJ, Arnaud M, Dalbon P, Sebbag M, Vincent C, Simon M, Senshu T, Masson-Bessiere C, Jolivet-Reynaud C, Jolivet M, Serre G (1999) The epitopes targeted by the rheumatoid arthritis-associated antifilaggrin autoantibodies are posttranslationally generated on various sites of (pro)filaggrin by deimination of arginine residues. J Immunol 162:585–594PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gloor M, Bettinger J, Gehring W (1998) Modification of stratum corneum quality by glycerin-containing external ointments. Hautarzt 49:6–9CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Halkier-Sorensen L, Petersen BH, Thestrup-Pedersen K (1995) Epidemiology of occupational skin diseases in Denmark: notification, recognition and compensation. In: van der Valk P, Maibach HI (eds) The irritant contact dermatitis syndrome. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 23–52Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Harding CR, Watkinson A, Rawlings AV, Scott IR (2000) Dry skin, moisturization and corneodesmolysis. Int J Cosmet Sci 22:21–52CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hug DH, Dunkerson DD, Hunter JK (1999) The degradation of L-histidine and trans- and cis-urocanic acid by bacteria from skin and the role of bacterial cis-urocanic acid isomerase. J Photochem Photobiol B 50:66–73CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hurkmans JF, Bodde HE, Van Driel LM, Van Doorne H, Junginger HE (1985) Skin irritation caused by transdermal drug delivery systems during long-term (5 days) application. Br J Dermatol 112:461–467CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jemec GB, Serup J (1990) Epidermal hydration and skin mechanics. The relationship between electrical capacitance and the mechanical properties of human skin in vivo. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 70(3):245–247Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kligman A (1996) Hydration injury to human skin. In: van der Valk P, Maibach HI (eds) The irritant contact dermatitis syndrome. CRC Press, Boca Ritan, pp 187–194Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Koc E, Tunca M, Akar A, Erbil AH, Demiralp B, Arca E (2008) Skin problems in amputees: a descriptive study. Int J Dermatol 47:463–466CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kubilus J, Scott I, Harding CR, Yendle J, Kvedar J, Baden HP (1985) The occurrence of profilaggrin and its processing in cultured keratinocytes. J Invest Dermatol 85:513–517CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kubilus J, Waitkus RW, Baden HP (1979) The presence of citrulline in epidermal proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta 581:114–121PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Le M, Schalkwijk J, Siegenthaler G, van de Kerkhof PC, Veerkamp JH, van der Valk PG (1996) Changes in keratinocyte differentiation following mild irritation by sodium dodecyl sulphate. Arch Dermatol Res 288:684–690CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Loden M, Olsson H, Axell T, Linde YW (1992) Friction, capacitance and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) in dry atopic and normal skin. Br J Dermatol 126:137–141CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lyon CC, Kulkarni J, Zimerson E, Van Ross E, Beck MH (2000) Skin disorders in amputees. J Am Acad Dermatol 42:501–507CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Malten KE (1981) Thoughts on irritant contact dermatitis. Contact dermatitis 7(5):238–247CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Masson-Bessiere C, Sebbag M, Girbal-Neuhauser E, Nogueira L, Vincent C, Senshu T, Serre G (2001) The major synovial targets of the rheumatoid arthritis-specific antifilaggrin autoantibodies are deiminated forms of the alpha- and beta-chains of fibrin. J Immunol 166:4177–4184PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Medeiros M Jr (1996) Aquagenic urticaria. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 6:63–64PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Meulenbelt HE, Geertzen JH, Jonkman MF, Dijkstra PU (2009) Determinants of skin problems of the stump in lower-limb amputees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 90:74–81CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nash T, Bellew JW, Cunningham M, McCulloch J (2005) Identifying cause for advancement to amputation in patients with diabetes: the role of medical care and patient compliance. Wounds 17(2):32–36Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ramsing DW, Agner T (1997) Effect of water on experimentally irritated human skin. Br J Dermatol 136:364–367CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rawlings AV, Harding CR (2004) Moisturization and skin barrier function. Dermatol Ther 17(Suppl 1):43–48CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rawlings AV, Scott IR, Harding CR, Bowser PA (1994) Stratum corneum moisturization at the molecular level. J Invest Dermatol 103:731–741CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rietschel RL, Fowler JF (1995) Dermatitis from metals used in medical devices and implants Fisher’s Contact Dermatitis. Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 426–429Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Robinson M, Visscher M, LaRuffa A, Wickett R (2010) Natural moisturizing factors (NMF) in the stratum corneum (SC) 1: effects of lipid extraction and soaking. J Cosmet Sci 61(1):13–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rustemeyer T, Frosch PJ (1996) Occupational skin diseases in dental laboratory technicians. (I). Clinical picture and causative factors. Contact Dermat 34(2):125–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Scott IR, Harding CR (1986) Filaggrin breakdown to water binding compounds during development of the rat stratum corneum is controlled by the water activity of the environment. Dev Biol 115:84–92CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Scott IR, Harding CR, Barrett JG (1982) Histidine-rich protein of the keratohyalin granules. Source of the free amino acids, urocanic acid and pyrrolidone carboxylic acid in the stratum corneum. Biochim Biophys Acta 719:110–117PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Smith PK, Krohn RI, Hermanson GT, Mallia AK, Gartner FH, Provenzano MD, Fujimoto EK, Goeke NM, Olson BJ, Klenk DC (1985) Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic acid. Anal Biochem 150:76–85CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Takahashi M, Tezuka T (2004) The content of free amino acids in the stratum corneum is increased in senile xerosis. Arch Dermatol Res 295:448–452CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Treffel P, Gabard B (1995) Stratum corneum dynamic function measurements after moisturizer or irritant application. Arch Dermatol Res 287:474–479CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Visscher MO, Chatterjee R, Ebel JP, LaRuffa AA, Hoath SB (2002) Biomedical assessment and instrumental evaluation of healthy infant skin. Pediatr Dermatol 19(6):473–481CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Visscher M, Hoath SB, Conroy E, Wickett RR (2001) Effect of semipermeable membranes on skin barrier repair following tape stripping. Arch Dermatol Res 293:491–499CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Visscher M, Robinson M, Wickett R (2010) Stratum corneum free amino acids following barrier perturbation and repair. Int J Cosmet Sci. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2494.2010.00592
  46. 46.
    Visscher MO, Chatterjee R, Munson KA, Bare DE, Hoath SB (2000) Development of diaper rash in the newborn. Pediatr Dermatol 17(1):52–57CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Visscher MS, Munson KA, Bare DE, Hoath SB (1999) Early adaptation of human skin following birth: a biophysical assessment. Skin Res Technol 5:213–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Warner RR, Boissy YL, Lilly NA, Spears MJ, McKillop K, Marshall JL, Stone KJ (1999) Water disrupts stratum corneum lipid lamellae: damage is similar to surfactants. J Invest Dermatol 113:960–966CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Warner RR, Stone KJ, Boissy YL (2003) Hydration disrupts human stratum corneum ultrastructure. J Invest Dermatol 120:275–284CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Willis (1973) The effects of prolonged water exposure on human skin. J Invest Dermatol 60(3):166–171CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Zhai H, Maibach HI (2002) Occlusion vs. skin barrier function. Skin Res Technol 8:1–6CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marty O. Visscher
    • 1
  • Marisa Robinson
    • 2
  • Benetta Fugit
    • 2
  • Richard J. Rosenberg
    • 3
  • Steven B. Hoath
    • 1
  • R. Randall Wickett
    • 2
  1. 1.Skin Sciences Program, Department of PediatricsCincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical CenterCincinnatiUSA
  2. 2.The James L. Winkle College of PharmacyUniversity of CincinnatiCincinnatiUSA
  3. 3.R. J. Rosenberg Orthopedic Lab, Inc.CincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations