The use of accelerometer-based navigation for coronal TKA alignment: a prospective, single surgeon comparative study
- 24 Downloads
There is the need for a device that can be used to accurately position components during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with minimal impact on procedure time, workflow and cost. This study aimed to investigate the accuracy and time efficiency of a novel, accelerometer-based navigation system (ABN).
This prospective, single surgeon study of patients undergoing TKA for osteoarthritis over a 5 year period involved a total of 138 patients: 110 using the ABN system and 28 without. The ABN system consists of two coupled inertial pods that are secured to resection guides, providing a body-fixed 3D coordinate system for limb segments. Post-operative coronal alignment was measured from standardised long-leg AP radiographs. Deviation of the femur and tibia from the neutral coronal mechanical axis was recorded. Intra-observer repeatability was performed on three independent blinded data sets. The BMI and the surgical time (skin to skin) were recorded for all patients.
The mean BMI was 34 in the ABN group and 33 in the control group (p = 0.92). The skin-to-skin time was also similar between the groups; 105 min in the navigation group and 100 min in the control group (p = 0.297). The use of navigation resulted in significantly fewer outliers as defined by < 3º deviation from the target angle. 3 of 110 navigated patients recorded an AP femur angle of more than 3º from the target of 90º, where 5 of 28 control patients fell outside of the ± 3º window (p = 0.009, Fig. 1).
The use of the ABN system significantly improved accuracy of implant position and alignment without increasing surgical time.
KeywordsKnee arthroplasty Navigation ABN Alignment
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 11.Kawaguchi K, Michishita K, Manabe T, Akasaka Y, Higuchi J (2017) Comparison of an accelerometer-based portable navigation system, patient-specific instrumentation, and conventional instrumentation for femoral alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Relat Res 29(4):269–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Goh GS, Liow MHL, Tay DK, Lo N, Yeo S, Tan M (2018) Accelerometer-based and computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: a reduction in mechanical axis outliers does not lead to improvement in functional outcomes or quality of life when compared to conventional total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 33(2):379–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Tsukeoka T, Tsuneizumi Y, Yoshino K (2019) An accelerometer-based navigation did not improve the femoral component positioning compared to a modified conventional technique of pre-operatively planned placement of intramedullary rod in total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 139(4):561–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Lombardi AV, Berend KR, Ng VY (2011) Neutral mechanical alignment: a requirement for successful TKA: affirms. Orthopedics 34(9):504Google Scholar
- 28.Woon JTK, Zeng ISL, Calliess T, Windhagen H, Ettinger M, Waterson HB et al (2018) Outcome of kinematic alignment using patient-specific instrumentation versus mechanical alignment in TKA: a meta-analysis and subgroup analysis of randomised trials. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 138(9):1293–1303CrossRefGoogle Scholar