Advertisement

The use of accelerometer-based navigation for coronal TKA alignment: a prospective, single surgeon comparative study

  • Mark ZhuEmail author
  • Elizabeth Lindsay
  • Andre Keenan
  • Paul Monk
  • Jacob Munro
Orthopaedic Surgery
  • 24 Downloads

Abstract

Introduction

There is the need for a device that can be used to accurately position components during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with minimal impact on procedure time, workflow and cost. This study aimed to investigate the accuracy and time efficiency of a novel, accelerometer-based navigation system (ABN).

Methods

This prospective, single surgeon study of patients undergoing TKA for osteoarthritis over a 5 year period involved a total of 138 patients: 110 using the ABN system and 28 without. The ABN system consists of two coupled inertial pods that are secured to resection guides, providing a body-fixed 3D coordinate system for limb segments. Post-operative coronal alignment was measured from standardised long-leg AP radiographs. Deviation of the femur and tibia from the neutral coronal mechanical axis was recorded. Intra-observer repeatability was performed on three independent blinded data sets. The BMI and the surgical time (skin to skin) were recorded for all patients.

Results

The mean BMI was 34 in the ABN group and 33 in the control group (p = 0.92). The skin-to-skin time was also similar between the groups; 105 min in the navigation group and 100 min in the control group (p = 0.297). The use of navigation resulted in significantly fewer outliers as defined by < 3º deviation from the target angle. 3 of 110 navigated patients recorded an AP femur angle of more than 3º from the target of 90º, where 5 of 28 control patients fell outside of the ± 3º window (p = 0.009, Fig. 1).

Conclusion

The use of the ABN system significantly improved accuracy of implant position and alignment without increasing surgical time.

Keywords

Knee arthroplasty Navigation ABN Alignment 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Ritter MA, Davis KE, Meding JB, Pierson JL, Berend ME, Malinzak RA (2011) The effect of alignment and BMI on failure of total knee replacement. J Bone Jt Surg Am 93(17):1588–1596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berend ME, Ritter MA, Meding JB, Faris PM, Keating EM, Redelman R et al (2004) Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428:26–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Huang NFR, Dowsey MM, Ee E, Stoney JD, Babazadeh S, Choong PF (2012) Coronal alignment correlates with outcome after total knee arthroplasty: 5-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. J Arthroplast 27(9):1737–1741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Denham RA, Bishop RE (1978) Mechanics of the knee and problems in reconstructive surgery. J Bone Jt Surg Br 60-B(3):345–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jones CW, Jerabek SA (2018) Current Role of computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 33(7):1989–1993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    de Steiger RN, Liu Y, Graves SE (2015) Computer navigation for total knee arthroplasty reduces revision rate for patients less than 65 years of age. J Bone Jt Surg Am 97(8):635–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bäthis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Lüring C, Zurakowski D, Grifka J (2004) Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Jt Surg Br 86(5):682–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Leone WA, Elson LC, Anderson CR (2015) A systematic literature review of three modalities in technologically assisted TKA. Adv Orthop 2015:719091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bae DK, Song SJ (2011) Computer assisted navigation in knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg 3(4):259–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Clayton RAE, Court-Brown CM (2008) The epidemiology of musculoskeletal tendinous and ligamentous injuries. Injury 39(12):1338–1344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kawaguchi K, Michishita K, Manabe T, Akasaka Y, Higuchi J (2017) Comparison of an accelerometer-based portable navigation system, patient-specific instrumentation, and conventional instrumentation for femoral alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Relat Res 29(4):269–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ikawa T, Takemura S, Kim M, Takaoka K, Minoda Y, Kadoya Y (2017) Usefulness of an accelerometer-based portable navigation system in total knee arthroplasty. Bone Jt J 99-B(8):1047–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Moo IH, Chen JYQ, Chau DHH, Tan SW, Lau ACK, Teo YS (2018) Similar radiological results with accelerometer-based navigation versus conventional technique in total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 26(2):2309499018772374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Goh GS, Liow MHL, Tay DK, Lo N, Yeo S, Tan M (2018) Accelerometer-based and computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: a reduction in mechanical axis outliers does not lead to improvement in functional outcomes or quality of life when compared to conventional total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 33(2):379–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Scuderi GR, Fallaha M, Masse V, Lavigne P, Amiot L, Berthiaume M (2014) Total knee arthroplasty with a novel navigation system within the surgical field. Orthop Clin North Am 45(2):167–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Goh GS, Liow MHL, Lim WS, Tay DK, Yeo SJ, Tan MH (2016) Accelerometer-based navigation is as accurate as optical computer navigation in restoring the joint line and mechanical axis after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective matched study. J Arthroplast 31(1):92–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Desseaux A, Graf P, Dubrana F, Marino R, Clavé A (2016) Radiographic outcomes in the coronal plane with iASSIST™ versus optical navigation for total knee arthroplasty: a preliminary case-control study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 102(3):363–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Liow MHL, Goh GS, Pang H, Tay DKJ, Lo NN, Yeo SJ (2016) Computer-assisted stereotaxic navigation improves the accuracy of mechanical alignment and component positioning in total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136(8):1173–1180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Niehaus R, Schilter D, Fornaciari P, Weinand C, Boyd M, Ziswiler M et al (2017) Experience of total knee arthroplasty using a novel navigation system within the surgical field. Knee 24(3):518–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kinney MC, Cidambi KR, Severns DL, Gonzales FB (2018) Comparison of the iAssist handheld guidance system to conventional instruments for mechanical axis restoration in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 33(1):61–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gharaibeh MA, Solayar GN, Harris IA, Chen DB, MacDessi SJ (2017) Accelerometer-based, portable navigation (KneeAlign) vs conventional instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized comparative trial. J Arthroplast 32(3):777–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tsukeoka T, Tsuneizumi Y, Yoshino K (2019) An accelerometer-based navigation did not improve the femoral component positioning compared to a modified conventional technique of pre-operatively planned placement of intramedullary rod in total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 139(4):561–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lombardi AV, Berend KR, Ng VY (2011) Neutral mechanical alignment: a requirement for successful TKA: affirms. Orthopedics 34(9):504Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Takahashi T, Ansari J, Pandit HG (2018) Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty or mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 31:999–1006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Parratte S, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ (2010) Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. J Bone Jt Surg Am 92(12):2143–2149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Li Y, Wang S, Wang Y, Yang M (2018) Does kinematic alignment improve short-term functional outcomes after total knee arthroplasty compared with mechanical alignment? a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Knee Surg 31(1):78–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lee S, Lee H, Lee D, Moon Y (2018) Slight under-correction following total knee arthroplasty for a valgus knee results in similar clinical outcomes. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 138(7):1011–1019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Woon JTK, Zeng ISL, Calliess T, Windhagen H, Ettinger M, Waterson HB et al (2018) Outcome of kinematic alignment using patient-specific instrumentation versus mechanical alignment in TKA: a meta-analysis and subgroup analysis of randomised trials. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 138(9):1293–1303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nam D, Jerabek SA, Cross MB, Mayman DJ (2012) Cadaveric analysis of an accelerometer-based portable navigation device for distal femoral cutting block alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Comput Aided Surg 17(4):205–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nam D, Dy CJ, Cross MB, Kang MN, Mayman DJ (2012) Cadaveric results of an accelerometer based, extramedullary navigation system for the tibial resection in total knee arthroplasty. Knee 19(5):617–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Zhu
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Elizabeth Lindsay
    • 1
  • Andre Keenan
    • 2
  • Paul Monk
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jacob Munro
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.University of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
  2. 2.Auckland District Health BoardAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations