Advertisement

Early complications and causes of revision after rotating-hinge TKA

  • L. Rouquette
  • C. BataillerEmail author
  • B. Muller
  • P. Neyret
  • E. Servien
  • S. Lustig
Knee Arthroplasty
  • 16 Downloads

Abstract

Introduction

The use of rotating-hinge total knee arthroplasties (TKA), despite several developments in prosthetic design, remains controversial. Results as well as indications of these devices are still discussed in primary intention and for young patients. The aim was to analyze early complications and survival rate of rotating-hinge TKA in primary intention and for revisions.

Methods

A retrospective study included all the patients operated for primary or revision TKA procedure using a rotating-hinge TKA between 2015 and 2018. Clinical and radiological data were collected before surgery and then at a minimum follow-up of 1 year. The primary endpoint was the aseptic revision-free survival rate. Secondary endpoints were the overall survival rate, IKS scores, range of motion and patellar complications.

Results

Forty patients were included at an average follow-up of 18 months. Primary implantation was performed for 12 patients (30%), and revision for 28 cases (70%). At a mean follow-up of 18 months, only one implant was removed for a septic cause. The cumulative survival rate at 24 months was 95%. At final review, eight knees (20%) had been revised, five (12.5%) due to infection, two (5%) because of extensor mechanism failure, two (5%) for global stiffness. The objective and subjective IKS were significantly higher postoperatively in both primary and revision groups (p < 0.0001). Patellar height was significantly smaller after revision (p = 0.04), while ROM significantly improved in this group (p = 0.02). At final endpoint, one implant was removed for a septic cause.

Conclusion

This rotating-hinge TKA provides satisfying clinical and functional outcomes in primary intentions and in revision cases. There was no implant-associated complication. The complication rate remains high for revision surgery cases, mostly due to previous joint infections and poor soft tissue quality causing extensor mechanism failure. A longer-term study should be conducted to confirm this trend.

Keywords

Total knee arthroplasty Rotating-hinge TKA Complications Infection Extensor mechanism 

Notes

Authors’ contributions

LR contributed to study design, data collection, statistical analysis, literature review and manuscript writing CB contributed to study design, statistical analysis, literature review and manuscript editing. BM contributed to study design, literature review and manuscript editing. PN and ES contributed to study design and manuscript editing. SL contributed to study design, supervision, literature review and manuscript editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

There is no funding source.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

CB, LR and BM declare that they have no conflict of interest. PN declare the following conflicts of interest: consultant for Smith & Nephew, royalties from Tornier-Wright, institutional research support to Tornier-Wright and Amplitude. ES declare she is consultant for Corin. SL declare the following conflicts of interest: consultant for Smith & Nephew, institutional research support to Corin and Amplitude. No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.

References

  1. 1.
    Robertsson O, Ranstam J, Sundberg M, W-Dahl A, Lidgren L (2014) The Swedish knee arthroplasty register: a review. Bone Joint Res 3(7):217–222.  https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.37.2000289 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Parratte S, Pagnano MW (2008) Instability after total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 57:295–304PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vince KG, Abdeen A, Sugimori T (2006) The unstable total knee arthroplasty: causes and cures. J Arthroplasty 21(4 Suppl 1):44–49.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2006.02.101 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kouk S, Rathod PA, Maheshwari AV, Deshmukh AJ (2018) Rotating hinge prosthesis for complex revision total knee arthroplasty: a review of the literature. J Clin Orthop Trauma 9(1):29–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2017.11.020 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aubriot JH, Deburge A, Genet JP, Group G (2014) GUEPAR hinge knee prosthesis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 100(1):27–32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2013.12.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barrack RL (2001) Evolution of the rotating hinge for complex total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392(392):292–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jones EC, Insall JN, Inglis AE, Ranawat CS (1979) GUEPAR knee arthroplasty results and late complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res 140:145–152Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Barrack RL (2002) Rise of the rotating hinge in revision total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 25(10):1020–1058PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kester MA, Cook SD, Harding AF, Rodriguez RP, Pipkin CS (1988) An evaluation of the mechanical failure modalities of a rotating hinge knee prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 228:156–163Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Draganich LF, Whitehurst JB, Chou LS, Piotrowski GA, Pottenger LA, Finn HA (1999) The effects of the rotating-hinge total knee replacement on gait and stair stepping. J Arthroplasty 14(6):743–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guenoun B, Latargez L, Freslon M, Defossez G, Salas N, Gayet LE (2009) Complications following rotating hinge Endo-Modell (Link) knee arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 95(7):529–536.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2009.07.013 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pour AE, Parvizi J, Slenker N, Purtill JJ, Sharkey PF (2007) Rotating hinged total knee replacement: use with caution. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(8):1735–1741.  https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.F.00893 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Petrou G, Petrou H, Tilkeridis C, Stavrakis T, Kapetsis T, Kremmidas N et al (2004) Medium-term results with a primary cemented rotating-hinge total knee replacement. A 7- to 15-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86(6):813–817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gehrke T, Kendoff D, Haasper C (2014) The role of hinges in primary total knee replacement. Bone Joint J 96-B(11 Supple A):93–95.  https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.96B11.34143 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kearns SM, Culp BM, Bohl DD, Sporer SM, Della Valle CJ, Levine BR (2018) Rotating hinge implants for complex primary and revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 33(3):766–770.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.10.009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Debette C, Parratte S, Maucort-Boulch D, Blanc G, Pauly V, Lustig S et al (2014) French adaptation of the new knee society scoring system for total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 100(5):531–534.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2014.03.025 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gaillard R, Bankhead C, Budhiparama N, Batailler C, Servien E, Lustig S (2018) Influence of patella height on total knee arthroplasty: outcomes and survival. J Arthroplasty.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.10.037 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cottino U, Abdel MP, Perry KI, Mara KC, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD (2017) Long-term results after total knee arthroplasty with contemporary rotating-hinge prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 99(4):324–330.  https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.16.00307 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Farid YR, Thakral R, Finn HA (2015) Intermediate-term results of 142 single-design, rotating-hinge implants: frequent complications may not preclude salvage of severely affected knees. J Arthroplasty 30(12):2173–2180.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.06.033 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Smith TH, Gad BV, Klika AK, Styron JF, Joyce TA, Barsoum WK (2013) Comparison of mechanical and nonmechanical failure rates associated with rotating hinged total knee arthroplasty in nontumor patients. J Arthroplasty 28(1):62–67e61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2012.05.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Springer BD, Hanssen AD, Sim FH, Lewallen DG (2001) The kinematic rotating hinge prosthesis for complex knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392(392):283–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Westrich GH, Mollano AV, Sculco TP, Buly RL, Laskin RS, Windsor R (2000) Rotating hinge total knee arthroplasty in severly affected knees. Clin Orthop Relat Res 379(379):195–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Brown LR, Clement ND, MacDonald DJ, Breusch SJ (2019) The survivorship of the link endo-rotational hinge total knee arthroplasty: 5-12-year follow-up of 100 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 139(1):107–112.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-3064-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zanirato A, Cavagnaro L, Basso M, Divano S, Felli L, Formica M (2018) Metaphyseal sleeves in total knee arthroplasty revision: complications, clinical and radiological results. A systematic review of the literature. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 138(7):993–1001.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-2967-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gathen M, Wimmer MD, Ploeger MM, Weinhold L, Schmid M, Wirtz DC et al (2018) Comparison of two-stage revision arthroplasty and intramedullary arthrodesis in patients with failed infected knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 138(10):1443–1452.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-3007-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Deehan DJ, Murray J, Birdsall PD, Holland JP, Pinder IM (2008) The role of the rotating hinge prosthesis in the salvage arthroplasty setting. J Arthroplast 23(5):683–688.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2007.05.055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Orthopedic Surgery Department, Hôpital de la Croix-RousseUniversité Lyon 1LyonFrance

Personalised recommendations