Advertisement

Biomechanical comparison of two biplanar and one monoplanar reconstruction techniques of the acromioclavicular joint

  • Michael O. SchärEmail author
  • Stefanie Jenni
  • Gion Fessel
  • Jess G. Snedeker
  • Markus Scheibel
  • Matthias A. Zumstein
Trauma Surgery
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

Introduction

The purpose of this proof-of-concept study was to investigate the biomechanical performance of two surgical techniques, namely (1) the double Tight-Rope fixation with an additional acromioclavicular FiberTape fixation (DTRC) and (2) the fixation of the clavicle to the acromion and coracoid in a bipodal manner (Bipod) using a Poly-Tape and FiberTape. Both techniques intend to address vertical and horizontal instability after acromioclavicular dislocation. They were compared with the commonly used (3) double Tight-Rope (DTR) technique, which only stabilizes the clavicle to the coracoid.

Materials and methods

The acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) of 18 composite Sawbone shoulder specimens (6 per reconstruction group) were tested for posterosuperior elongation (70N cyclical load, 1500 cycles), load-to-failure and stiffness.

Results

After 1500 cycles, the DTRC, Bipod and DTR group showed an elongation of 0.45 mm (SD 0.14 mm), 1.19 mm (SD 0.54 mm), and 0.46 mm (SD 0.15 mm), respectively. Although the elongation of the Bipod group was increased when compared to the other two groups (Bipod versus DTRC p = 0.008; Bipod versus DTR p = 0.006), the difference was less than 0.7 mm. The DTRC showed a higher load-to-failure of 656.1N (SD 58.1 N) compared to the Bipod [531.1 N (SD 108.2N) (p = 0.039)] and DTR group [522.8 N (SD 32.8 N) (p = 0.033)].

Conclusion

The DTRC and the DTR group resulted in similar low elongation, while the elongation in the Bipod technique was slightly higher. Even though this difference of 0.7 mm shows statistical significance, it most likely has no clinical relevance. When testing in posterosuperior direction, which is the clinically relevant load vector, an additional fixation of the clavicle to the acromion did not reduce elongation in this study. It is, furthermore, questionable if the benefit of an increased load-to-failure in combination with no improvement in elongation and stiffness as seen in the DTRC group outweighs the possible risks and increased costs coming with the DTRC refixation.

Keywords

Acromioclavicular joint dislocation Arthroscopically assisted Bipod Double Tight-Rope Tight-Rope Rockwood Cerclage 

Abbreviations

ACJ

Acromioclavicular joint

AC

Acromioclavicular

AP

Anterior–posterior

CC

Coracoclavicular

DTR

Double Tight-Rope

DTRC

Double Tight-Rope fixation with an additional acromioclavicular FiberTape fixation

N

Newton

SD

Standard deviation

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Arthrex (Naples, Fl, USA) for donating the double Tight-Ropes, FiberTapes and Sawbones, and Poly-Tapes (Leeds, UK) for donating the tapes used in this study. The authors thank Talmadge Eyre for revising the manuscript for grammar and syntax.

Authors’ contributions

MOS carried out the study design, participated in data acquisition, performed the statistical analysis, and drafted the manuscript. SJ conceived the testing setup, participated in data acquisition, and performed the statistical analysis. GF conceived the testing setup and participated in data acquisition. JGS carried out the study design, conceived the testing setup and revised the manuscript critically. MS conceived and carried out the study design, was involved in clinical interpretation of the data, and revised the manuscript critically. MAS conceived and carried out the study design, gave substantial contribution in interpretation of data, and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

There is no funding source.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Rolf O, Hann von Weyhern A, Ewers A, Boehm TD, Gohlke F (2008) Acromioclavicular dislocation Rockwood III–V: results of early versus delayed surgical treatment. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128(10):1153–1157.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0524-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eschler A, Gradl G, Gierer P, Mittlmeier T, Beck M (2012) Hook plate fixation for acromioclavicular joint separations restores coracoclavicular distance more accurately than PDS augmentation, however presents with a high rate of acromial osteolysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132(1):33–39.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-011-1399-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Leidel BA, Braunstein V, Pilotto S, Mutschler W, Kirchhoff C (2009) Mid-term outcome comparing temporary K-wire fixation versus PDS augmentation of Rockwood grade III acromioclavicular joint separations. BMC Res Notes 2:84.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-2-84 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shin SJ, Kim NK (2015) Complications after arthroscopic coracoclavicular reconstruction using a single adjustable-loop-length suspensory fixation device in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Arthroscopy 31(5):816–824.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2014.11.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kraus N, Haas NP, Scheibel M, Gerhardt C (2013) Arthroscopically assisted stabilization of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations in a coracoclavicular Double-TightRope technique: V-shaped versus parallel drill hole orientation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133(10):1431–1440.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-013-1804-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dawson PA, Adamson GJ, Pink MM, Kornswiet M, Lin S, Shankwiler JA, Lee TQ (2009) Relative contribution of acromioclavicular joint capsule and coracoclavicular ligaments to acromioclavicular stability. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18(2):237–244.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2008.08.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Saier T, Venjakob AJ, Minzlaff P, Fohr P, Lindell F, Imhoff AB, Vogt S, Braun S (2015) Value of additional acromioclavicular cerclage for horizontal stability in complete acromioclavicular separation: a biomechanical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23(5):1498–1505.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-2895-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Debski RE, Parsons IM 3rd, Fenwick J, Vangura A (2000) Ligament mechanics during three degree-of-freedom motion at the acromioclavicular joint. Ann Biomed Eng 28(6):612–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kraus N, Hann C, Gerhardt C, Haas NP, Scheibel M (2014) Arthroskopisch-assistierte ACG-Stabilisation in Doppel-TightRope-Technik mit AC-Cerclage—Ergebnisevaluation eines resorbierbaren versus nicht-resorbierbaren Cerclagematerials—eine Matched-Pair-Analyse. Paper presented at the Deutscher Kongress für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie (DKOU 2014), Berlin, Oct. 28th–31st 2014Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    De Beer J, Schaer M, Latendresse K, Raniga S, Moor BK, Zumstein MA (2016) BiPOD arthroscopic acromioclavicular repair restores bidirectional stability. Orthopedics.  https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20160915-01 Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Salzmann GM, Walz L, Buchmann S, Glabgly P, Venjakob A, Imhoff AB (2010) Arthroscopically assisted 2-bundle anatomical reduction of acute acromioclavicular joint separations. Am J Sports Med 38(6):1179–1187.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546509355645 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Salzmann GM, Walz L, Schoettle PB, Imhoff AB (2008) Arthroscopic anatomical reconstruction of the acromioclavicular joint. Acta Orthop Belg 74(3):397–400Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rios CG, A RA, Mazzocca AD (2007) Anatomy of the clavicle and coracoid process for reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligaments. Am J Sports Med 35(5):811–817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ludewig PM, Cook TM, Nawoczenski DA (1996) Three-dimensional scapular orientation and muscle activity at selected positions of humeral elevation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 24(2):57–65.  https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.1996.24.2.57 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mazzocca AD, Spang JT, R RR, Rios CG, Shea KP, Romeo AA, R.A. A (2008) Biomechanical and radiographic analysis of partial coracoclavicular ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med 36(7):1397–1402.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546508315200 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pavlik A, Csepai D, Hidas P (2001) Surgical treatment of chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocation by modified Weaver-Dunn procedure. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 9(5):307–312.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s001670100222 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Blazar PE, Iannotti JP, Williams GR (1998) Anteroposterior instability of the distal clavicle after distal clavicle resection. Clin Orthop Relat R (348):114–120Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mazzocca AD, Santangelo SA, Johnson ST, Rios CG, Dumonski ML, Arciero RA (2006) A biomechanical evaluation of an anatomical coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 34(2):236–246.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546505281795 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Beitzel K, Obopilwe E, Apostolakos J, Cote MP, Russell RP, Charette R, Singh H, Arciero RA, Imhoff AB, Mazzocca AD (2014) Rotational and translational stability of different methods for direct acromioclavicular ligament repair in anatomic acromioclavicular joint reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 42(9):2141–2148.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546514538947 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Freedman JA, Adamson GJ, Bui C, Lee TQ (2010) Biomechanical evaluation of the acromioclavicular capsular ligaments and reconstruction with an intramedullary free tissue graft. Am J Sports Med 38(5):958–964.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546509355056 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shin SJ, Campbell S, Scott J, McGarry MH, Lee TQ (2014) Simultaneous anatomic reconstruction of the acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligaments using a single tendon graft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(9):2216–2222.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2569-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Abrams GD, McGarry MH, Jain NS, Freehill MT, Shin SJ, Cheung EV, Lee TQ, Safran MR (2013) Biomechanical evaluation of a coracoclavicular and acromioclacicular ligament reconstruction technique utilizing a single continuous intramedullary free tendon graft. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 22(7):979–985.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2012.09.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Singh B, Mohanlal P, Bawale R (2016) Early failure of coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction using TightRope system. Acta orthopaedica Belgica 82(1):119–123Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Walz L, Salzmann GM, Fabbro T, Eichhorn S, Imhoff AB (2008) The anatomic reconstruction of acromioclavicular joint dislocations using 2 TightRope devices: a biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med 36(12):2398–2406.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546508322524 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gonzalez-Lomas G, Javidan P, Lin T, Adamson GJ, Limpisvasti O, Lee TQ (2010) Intramedullary acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction strengthens isolated coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction in acromioclavicular dislocations. Am J Sports Med 38(10):2113–2122.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546510371442 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael O. Schär
    • 1
    Email author
  • Stefanie Jenni
    • 1
  • Gion Fessel
    • 2
  • Jess G. Snedeker
    • 2
  • Markus Scheibel
    • 3
  • Matthias A. Zumstein
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and TraumatologyInselspital, University of BernBernSwitzerland
  2. 2.Department of OrthopaedicsUniversity of ZurichBalgristSwitzerland
  3. 3.Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal SurgeryCharité- Universitaetsmedizin BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations