Advertisement

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

, Volume 139, Issue 4, pp 577–581 | Cite as

Biomechanical comparison of the proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis using a compression wire

  • Michael MillroseEmail author
  • Alexander Zach
  • Simon Kim
  • Claas Güthoff
  • Andreas Eisenschenk
  • Hans Christoph Vonderlind
Handsurgery
  • 27 Downloads

Abstract

Introduction/aim

Arthrodesis of the proximal interphalangeal joint of the finger is a common procedure for the treatment of osteoarthritis. The aim of this biomechanical study was to compare the primary stability of one, respectively, two compression wires to intraosseous wiring and tension band wiring for the arthrodesis.

Materials and methods

The stability of the arthrodesis was tested by applying flexion (n = 11) and extension (n = 10) force with 10° bending. Arthrodesis was achieved by one, respectively, two crossed compression wires and intraosseous wiring. In a control group (n = 11) tension band wiring was tested to 10° flexion and extension as well.

Results

Mean values for flexion bending for intraosseous wiring were 10.94 N, for one compression wire 12.82 N, for tension band wiring 17.95 N, and for two crossed compression wires 20.42 N. Mean values for extension bending were 9.71 N for intraosseous wiring, 13.63 N for one compression wire, 21.43 N for tension band wiring and 22.56 N for two crossed compression wires.

Conclusion

The primary stability of the compression wires was statistically significant superior to intraosseous wiring. In comparison to tension band wiring which showed an intermediate stability. The application of a compression wire could be considered for further clinical testing in the arthrodesis of interphalangeal joints.

Keywords

Interphalangeal arthrodesis Compression wire Intraosseous wiring Biomechanical study 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Mrs. Alexandra Quooss for the biomechanical inputs.

Funding

There is no funding source.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Alexander Zach: workshop instructor and lecture for Königsee Implantate GmbH (Am Sand 4/OT Aschau, 07426, Allendorf, Germany). On behalf of all other authors, the corresponding author states that all other named authors hereby declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Ethical approval

This study was approved (Reference number: BB 130/13) by an institutional review board.

References

  1. 1.
    Beldner S, Polatsch DB (2016) Arthrodesis of the metacarpophalangeal and interphalangeal joints of the hand: current concepts. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 24:290–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Spies CK, Langer M, Hahn P, Müller LP, Unglaub F (2018) The treatment of primary arthritis of the finger and thumb joint. Dtsch Arztebl Int 115(16):269–275Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Moberg E (1960) Arthrodesis of finger joints. Surg Clin N Am 40:465–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leibovic SJ (2007) Instructional Course Lecture. Arthrodesis of the interphalangeal joints with headless compression screws. J Hand Surg Am 32(7):1113–1119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Leibovic SJ (1997) Internal fixation for small joint arthrodeses in the hand. The interphalangeal joints. Hand Clin 13:601–613Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Divelbiss BJ, Baratz ME (1999) The role of arthroplasty and arthrodesis following trauma to the upper extremity. Hand Clin 15:335–345Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Capo JT, Melamed E, Shamian B, Hadley SR, Lai N, Gerszberg K, Rivero S, Caravaggi P (2014) Biomechanical evaluation of 5 fixation devices for proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis. J Hand Surg Am 39:1971–1977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Breyer JM, Vergara P, Parra L, Sotelo P, Bifani A, Andrade F (2015) Metacarpophalangeal and interphalangeal joint arthrodesis: a comparative study between tension band and compression screw fixation. J Hand Surg Eur 40:374–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rijnja JP, Kouwenberg PPGM, Ray S, Walbeehm ET (2017) Robert Mathys Finger prosthesis of the proximal interphalangeal joint: a retrospective case series of 19 joints in 17 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137(8):1155–1160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schindele SF, Altwegg A, Hensler S (2017) Surface replacement of proximal interphalangeal joints using CapFlex-PIP. Op Orthop Traumatol 29(1):86–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zach A (2015) Percutaneous fixation of transverse shaft fractures of the proximal phalanx with a new compression wire. J Hand Surg Eur 40(3):318–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lister G (1978) Intraosseous wiring of the digital skeleton. J Hand Surg Am 3:427–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kovach JC, Werner FW, Palmer AK, Greenkey S, Murphy DJ (1986) Biomechanical analysis of internal fixation techniques for proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis. J Hand Surg Am 11:562–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mittelmeier W, Lehner S, Gollwitzer H, Hauschild M, Werber KD, Steinhauser E (2005) Comparing biomechanical investigations about different wiring techniques of finger joint arthrodesis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 125:145–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hogh J, Jensen PO (1982) Compression-arthrodesis of finger joints using Kirschner wires and cerclage. Hand 14:149–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Leibovic SJ, Strickland JW (1994) Arthrodesis of the proximal interphalangeal joint of the finger: comparison of the use of the Herbert screw with other fixation methods. J Hand Surg Am 19:181–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Buck-Gramcko D, Oehme S (1988) Finger joint arthrodeses with intraosseous wire suture and Kirschner wire. A comparative study of 309 operations. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 20:99–106Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hohendorff B, Franke J, Spies CK, Müller LP, Ries C (2017) Arthrodesis of the proximal interphalangeal joint of fingers with tension band wire. Op Orthop Traumatol 29(5):385–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mittelmeier W, Braun C, Hauschild M, Schaefer R (1999) Technique of finger arthrodesis by dorsal thread tension band fixation. Comparing biomechanical investigations. Unfallchirurg 102:466–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ayres JR, Goldstrohm GL, Miller GJ, Dell PC (1988) Proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis with the Herbert screw. J Hand Surg Am 13:600–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ritt MJ, Bos KE (1993) Proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis using powered staple fixation. Observations on autopsy specimens. Clin Orthop Relat Res 292:172–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Alluri RK, Hill JR, Navo P, Ghiassi A, Stevanovic M, Mostofi A (2018) Washer and post augmentation of 90/90 wiring for proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis: a biomechanical study. J Hand Surg Am 43(12):1137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Van Haaren E, van der Zward B, van der Veen A, Heyligers I, Wuisman P, Smit T (2008) Effect of long-term preservation on the mechanical properties of cortical bone in goats. Acta Orthop 79:708–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Unger S, Blauth M, Schmoelz W (2010) Effects of three different preservation methods on the mechanical properties of human and bovine cortical bone. Bone 47:1048–1053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Elfar J, Menorca RM, Reed JD, Stanbury S (2014) Composite bone models in orthopaedic surgery research and education. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 22:111–120Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Hand SurgeryBerufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik MurnauMurnau am StaffelseeGermany
  2. 2.Department of Trauma SurgeryHelios Hanseklinikum StralsundBerlinGermany
  3. 3.Center for Hand-and Functional MicrosurgeryUniversity Medicine GreifswaldGreifswaldGermany
  4. 4.Center for Clinical Research, Department of Trauma and Orthopedic SurgeryUnfallkrankenhaus BerlinBerlinGermany
  5. 5.European Medical School, University Hospital for Orthopedics and TraumatologyKlinikum OldenburgOldenburgGermany

Personalised recommendations