When and how to operate the posterior malleolus fragment in trimalleolar fractures: a systematic literature review
- 251 Downloads
Whether or not and how to fixate the posterior malleolus fracture seems to depend on the fracture fragment size and its amount of dislocation, but clear guidelines for daily practice are lacking. In this review, we summarize the literature on preferred treatment of the posterior fragment in trimalleolar fractures.
A systematic review of publications between January 1995 and April 30 2017 on this topic in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases was performed according to the PRISMA statement.
Seventeen (2 prospective and 15 retrospective) of the 180 identified studies were included. Six studies report on indications for fixation of posterior malleolus fracture fragments. Eleven studies compare different fixation approaches and techniques for the posterior fragment. Meta-analysis was not possible due to varying fixation criteria and outcomes. There was no clear association between posterior fragment size and functional outcome or development of osteoarthritis. The non-anatomical reduction of the fragment was of more influence on outcome. Radiological and functional outcome was better after open reduction and internal fixation via the posterolateral approach than after percutaneous anterior-to-posterior screw fixation.
The posterior fragment size is not a clear indication for its fixation. A step-off, however, seems an important indicator for developing posttraumatic osteoarthritis and worse functional outcome. Posterior fragments involving the intra-articular surface need to be reduced and fixated to prevent postoperative persisting step-off. Furthermore, fixation of the posterior malleolus via an open posterolateral approach seems superior to percutaneous anterior-to-posterior fixation. However, these results need to be confirmed in a prospective comparative trial.
Level of evidence
Therapeutic level II.
KeywordsTrimalleolar fractures Malleolar fractures Posterolateral approach Ankle fractures Treatment Fixation
There is no funding source.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- 2.McDaniel WJ, Wilson FC (1977) Trimalleolar fractures of the ankle. An end result study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 122:37–45Google Scholar
- 4.Lindsjö U (1985) Operative treatment of ankle fracture-dislocations. A follow-up study of 306/321 consecutive cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 199:28–38Google Scholar
- 15.Fu S, Zou ZY, Mei G et al (2013) Advances and disputes of posterior malleolus fracture. Chin Med J (Engl) 126(20):3972–3977Google Scholar
- 33.Meijer DT, de Muinck Keizer RJ, Doornberg JN, Ankle Platform Study Collaborative—Science of Variation Group, et al (2016) Diagnostic accuracy of 2-dimensional computed tomography for articular involvement and fracture pattern of posterior malleolar fractures. Foot Ankle Int 37(1):75–82CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 34.Meijer DT, Doornberg JN, Sierevelt IN, Ankle Platform Study Collaborative—Science of Variation Group;Ankle Platform Study Collaborative—Science of Variation Group et al (2015) Guesstimation of posterior malleolar fractures on lateral plain radiographs. Injury 46(10):2024–2029CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar