Advertisement

A residual intra-articular varus after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) for varus osteoarthritis of the knee

  • Weiping Ji
  • Congfeng LuoEmail author
  • Yu Zhan
  • Xuetao Xie
  • Qifang He
  • Binbin Zhang
Orthopaedic Surgery
  • 24 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Varus deformity of knee osteoarthritis was formed by both intra-articular and extra-articular pathologies. Such intra-articular deformities could not be fully corrected by a medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO), which was performed as an extra-articular procedure. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate whether any residual varus was left inside the joint after HTO in the patients with knee osteoarthritis, and a correlation of the residual varus could be traced.

Methods

This study involved 66 patients (66 knees) undergoing HTO for medial knee osteoarthritis. The percentage of mechanical axis (%MA), mechanical femorotibial angle (mFTA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA) and joint line convergence angle (JLCA) were measured on radiographs of the full-length legs preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. The relationship between changes in the JLCA and alignment correction was assessed. The postoperative residual JLCA was categorized as the optimal (postoperative JLCA ≤ 2°), the acceptable (2° < postoperative JLCA ≤ 5°), and the unacceptable (postoperative JLCA > 5°) to analyze its correlation with pre- or intra-operative factors.

Results

Average %MA and mFTA were improved from 5.5 to 60% and from 190.2° to 176.4°, respectively. There was no change in mLDFA, whereas mMPTA changed from 80.3° to 91.8°. JLCA changed from 4.2° to 2.7°. The analyses of multiple linear regression showed that the preoperative JLCA and postoperative changes in mechanical alignment (%MA, mFTA and mMPTA) were two important variables dependently associated with differences in JLCAs postoperatively. However, postoperative JLCAs showed a stronger correlation to preoperative JLCAs than to changes in mechanical alignment postoperatively. A Chi-square analysis showed a significantly higher percentage of patients achieved acceptable postoperative JLCAs in the preoperative JLCA ≤ 6° group (78.8%) compared to the preoperative JLCA > 6° group (6.1%). Therefore, 6° of JLCA was suggested to be a tipping point.

Conclusions

The capability of HTO to correct intra-articular varus deformities, which was represented by JLCAs, is limited. Postoperative residual JLCAs were correlated primarily to preoperative JLCA values and total alignment correction, while the former accounted for most. A preoperative JLCA of 6° was suggested to be a tipping point, and a larger value indicated more than 5° residual JLCA after the HTO.

Keywords

Knee osteoarthritis Varus deformity High tibial osteotomy Intra-articular varus deformity Extra-articular varus deformity Joint line convergence angle 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The project was supported by the National natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 81572118).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Project supported by the National natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 81572118).

References

  1. 1.
    Koshino T, Yoshida T, Ara Y et al (2004) Fifteen to twenty-eight years’ follow-up results of high tibial valgus osteotomy for osteoarthritic knee. Knee 11:439–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Floerkemeier S, Staubli AE, Schroeter S, Goldhahn S, Lobenhoffer P (2013) Outcome after high tibial open-wedge osteotomy: a retrospective evaluation of 533 patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(1):170–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bode G, von Heyden J, Pestka J, Schmal H, Salzmann G, Südkamp N et al (2015) Prospective 5-year survival rate data following open-wedge valgus high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23(7):1949–1955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lee OS, Ahn S, Lee YS (2017) Effect and safety of early weight-bearing on the outcome after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137(7):903–911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Park HJ, Kim SS, Lee SY, Park NH, Park JY, Choi YJ, Jeon HJ (2013) A practical MRI grading system for osteoarthritis of the knee: association with Kellgren–Lawrence radiographic scores. Eur J Radiol 82(1):112–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Thienpont E, Schwab PE, Cornu O, Bellemans J, Victor J (2017) Bone morphotypes of the varus and valgus knee. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137(3):393–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shin YS, Kim KH, Sim HB, Yoon JR (2016) Comparison between two angular stable locking plates for medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy: decisive wedge locking plate versus TomoFix™. J Orthop Sci 21(6)791–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chiba K, Yonekura A, Miyamoto T, Osaki M, Chiba GTibial condylar valgus osteotomy (TCVO) for osteoarthritis of the knee: 5-year clinical and radiological results. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137(3):303–310Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Philipp L. Ronald JH, Alex ES, Roland PJ (2008) Osteotomies around the knee. Thieme 277:87–104Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Marx RG, Grimm P, Lillemoe KA, Robertson CM, Ayeni QR, Lyman S et al (2011) Reliability of lower Extremity alignment measurement using radiographs and PACS. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arhtrosc 19:1693–1698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kreitz TM, Maltenfort MG, Lonner JH (2015) The valgus stress radiograph does not determine the full extent of correction of deformity prior to medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 30:1233–1236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Waldstein W, Monsef JB, Buckup J, Boettner F (2013) The value of valgus stress radiographs in the workup for medial unicompartmental arthritis knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:3998–4003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee DH, Park SC, Park HJ, Han SB (2016) Effect of soft tissue laxity of the knee joint on limb alignment correction in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24(12):3704–3712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Heijens E, Kornherr P, Meister C (2016) The coronal hypomochlion: a tipping point of clinical relevance when planning valgus producing high tibial osteotomies. Bone Jt J 98-B(5):628–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ogawa H, Matsumoto K, Ogawa T, Takeuchi K, Akiyama H (2016) Preoperative varus laxity correlates with overcorrection in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136(10):1337–1342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Polat G, Balcı Hİ, Çakmak MF, Demirel M, Şen C, Aşık M (2017) J Orthop Surg Res 16(1):44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jang YW, Lim D, Seo H, Lee MC, Lee OS, Lee YS (2018) Role of an anatomically contoured plate and metal block for balanced stability between the implant and lateral hinge in open-wedge high-tibial osteotomy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 138(7):911–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schröter S, Günzel J, Freude T, Ateschrang A, Stöckle U, Albrecht D (2012).Precision in the planning of open wedge HTOZ. Orthop Unfall 150(4):368–373Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kleeblad LJ, Zuiderbaan HAHA, Hooper GJ, Pearle AD (2017) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: state of the art. J ISAKOS Jt Disord Orthop Sport Med 2:97–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mootanah R, Imhauser CW, Reisse F, Carpanen D, Walker RW, Koff MF et al (2014) Development and validation of a computational model of the knee joint for the evaluation of surgical treatments for osteoarthritis. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 17:1502–1517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kreitz TM, Maltenfort MG, Lonner JH (2015) The valgus stress radiograph does not determine the full extent of correction of deformity prior to medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 30:1233–1236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vasso M, Del Regno C, D’Amelio A, Viggiano D, Corona K, Schiavone Panni A (2015) Minor varus alignment provides better results than neutral alignment in medial UKA. Knee 22:117–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    van der List JP, Zuiderbaan HA, Pearle AD (2016) Why do medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasties fail today? J Arthroplasty 31:1016–1021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tsukeoka T, Lee TH (2012) Sagittal flexion of the femoral component affects flexion gap and sizing in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 27:1094–1099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Eriksson K, Sadr-Azodi O, Singh C, Osti L, Bartlett J (2010) Stress radiography for osteoarthritis of the knee: a new technique. Knee Surg Sports TraumatolArthrosc 18:1356–1359CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Affiliated Sixth People’s HospitalShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations