Rotator cuff muscular integrity after arthroscopic revision of a Bankart repair
- 264 Downloads
Recurrent shoulder instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair is still a common complication. For primary Bankart repair studies have shown that the rotator cuff can recover completely. The ability of muscles to regenerate after arthroscopic revision Bankart repair (ARBR) has not been studied. Does the ARBR using a three-portal method allows complete muscle integrity compared with an uninjured imaging control group (ICG)?
Materials and methods
Twenty-two (1 female, 21 males) physically active patients (mean age at follow-up 28.5 ± 7.1 years; mean follow-up 27.5 months ± 8.5) were assessed. ARBR with a three-portal method was carried out in all patients according to previous primary arthroscopic stabilization of the shoulder (revision Bankart group). Muscle atrophy of the subscapularis muscle (SSC), supraspinatus muscle (SSP) and infraspinatus muscle (ISP) was assessed by making lateral and vertical measurements by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Fatty infiltration was detected by standardized assessment from variations in intensity. Detailed clinical examination of the rotator cuff was carried out. MRI assessment was compared with that of a control group of 22 healthy volunteers of same age and activity level (ICG).
For the SSC, no muscle impairment was noted compared with the ICG [superior atrophy index (sAISSC), p = 0.439; inferior atrophy index (iAISSC), p = 0.555; superior fatty infiltration index (sFDISSC), p = 0.294; inferior fatty infiltration index (iFDISSC), p = 0.62]. In investigation of the SSP and ISP, fatty infiltration was not shown (FDISSP, p = 0.454; sFDIISP, p = 0.504), though persistent muscle atrophy was found even > 2 years after surgery compared with the ICG (AISSP, p = 0.0025; sAIISP, p = 0.0009; iAIISP, p = 0.0004).
ARBR using a three-portal method allowed good muscular integrity compared with the ICG, but with persistent slight muscular atrophy of the SSP and ISP.
KeywordsMuscular integrity Arthroscopic revision of Bankart repair Rehabilitation Muscular atrophy
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 18.Merolla G, De Santis E, Campi F, Paladini P, Porcellini G (2010) Supraspinatus and infraspinatus weakness in overhead athletes with scapular dyskinesis: strength assessment before and after restoration of scapular musculature balance. Musculoskeletal surgery 94:119–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-010-0082-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Nofsinger C, Browning B, Burkhart SS, Pedowitz RA (2011) Objective preoperative measurement of anterior glenoid bone loss: a pilot study of a computer-based method using unilateral 3-dimensional computed tomography. Arthroscopy 27:322–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2010.09.007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 29.Stein T, Buckup J, Efe T, von Eisenhart-Rothe R, Hoffmann R, Zimmermann E, Welsch F (2015) Structural and clinical integrity of the rotator cuff in athletes after arthroscopic Bankart repair using the three-portal technique. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135:369–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2158-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 30.Stein T, Buckup J, Mehling AP, Hoffmann R, Efe T, von Eisenhart-Rothe R, Welsch F (2014) Restoration of joint congruency and the glenoidal labrum after arthroscopic revision Bankart repair: a MRI match-paired analysis comparing primary Bankart repair and the uninjured labrum. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134:1121–1134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-014-1990-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 31.Stein T, Mehling AP, Reck C, Buckup J, Efe T, Hoffmann R, Jager A, Welsch F (2011) MRI assessment of the structural labrum integrity after Bankart repair using knotless bio-anchors. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1771–1779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1407-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 33.Ward SR, Hentzen ER, Smallwood LH, Eastlack RK, Burns KA, Fithian DC, Friden J, Lieber RL (2006) Rotator cuff muscle architecture: implications for glenohumeral stability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 448:157–163. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000194680.94882.d3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar