Advertisement

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

, Volume 137, Issue 9, pp 1293–1299 | Cite as

High non-anatomic tunnel position rates in ACL reconstruction failure using both transtibial and anteromedial tunnel drilling techniques

  • Vera Jaecker
  • Tabea Zapf
  • Jan-Hendrik Naendrup
  • Thomas Pfeiffer
  • Ajay C. Kanakamedala
  • Arasch Wafaisade
  • Sven ShafizadehEmail author
Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine

Abstract

Introduction

Although it is well known from cadaveric and biomechanical studies that transtibial femoral tunnel (TT) positioning techniques are associated with non-anatomic tunnel positions, controversial data exist as so far no clinical differences could have been found, comparing transtibial with anteromedial techniques (AM). The purpose of the study was to analyze if graft failure following TT ACL reconstruction was more commonly associated with non-anatomic tunnel position in comparison with the AM technique. We hypothesized that, compared to AM techniques, non-anatomic tunnel positions correlate with TT tunnel positioning techniques.

Materials and methods

A total of 147 cases of ACL revision surgery were analyzed retrospectively. Primary ACL reconstructions were analyzed regarding the femoral tunnel drilling technique. Femoral and tibial tunnel positions were determined on CT scans using validated radiographic measurement methods. Correlation analysis was performed to determine differences between TT and AM techniques.

Results

A total of 101 cases were included, of whom 64 (63.4%) underwent the TT technique and 37 (36.6%) the AM technique for primary ACL reconstruction. Non-anatomic femoral tunnel positions were found in 77.2% and non-anatomical tibial tunnel positions in 40.1%. No correlations were found comparing tunnel positions in TT and AM techniques, revealing non-anatomic femoral tunnel positions in 79.7 and 73% and non-anatomic tibial tunnel positions in 43.7 and 35.1%, respectively (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

Considerable rates of non-anatomic femoral and tibial tunnel positions were found in ACL revisions with both transtibial and anteromedial femoral drilling techniques. Despite the potential of placing tunnels more anatomically using an additional AM portal, this technique does not ensure anatomic tunnel positioning. Consequently, the data highlight the importance of anatomic tunnel positioning in primary ACL reconstruction, regardless of the applied drilling technique.

Keywords

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ACL reconstruction Revision Tunnel positioning Transtibial femoral tunnel positioning Anteromedial femoral tunnel positioning 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Chen JL, Allen CR, Stephens TE, Haas AK, Huston LJ, Wright RW, Feeley BT, Multicenter ACLRSG (2013) Differences in mechanisms of failure, intraoperative findings, and surgical characteristics between single- and multiple-revision ACL reconstructions: a MARS cohort study. Am J Sports Med 41(7):1571–1578CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kamath GV, Redfern JC, Greis PE, Burks RT (2011) Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 39(1):199–217CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Diamantopoulos AP, Lorbach O, Paessler HH (2008) Anterior cruciate ligament revision reconstruction: results in 107 patients. Am J Sports Med 36(5):851–860CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shafizadeh S, Jaecker V, Otchwemah R, Banerjee M, Naendrup JH (2016) Current status of ACL reconstruction in Germany. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136(5):593–603CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Duquin TR, Wind WM, Fineberg MS, Smolinski RJ, Buyea CM (2009) Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Knee Surg 22(1):7–12CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kopf S, Forsythe B, Wong AK, Tashman S, Irrgang JJ, Fu FH (2012) Transtibial ACL reconstruction technique fails to position drill tunnels anatomically in vivo 3D CT study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(11):2200–2207CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Strauss EJ, Barker JU, McGill K, Cole BJ, Bach BR Jr, Verma NN (2011) Can anatomic femoral tunnel placement be achieved using a transtibial technique for hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Am J Sports Med 39(6):1263–1269CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kopf S, Forsythe B, Wong AK, Tashman S, Anderst W, Irrgang JJ, Fu FH (2010) Nonanatomic tunnel position in traditional transtibial single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction evaluated by three-dimensional computed tomography. J Bone Jt Surg Am 92(6):1427–1431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Heming JF, Rand J, Steiner ME (2007) Anatomical limitations of transtibial drilling in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 35(10):1708–1715CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Duffee A, Magnussen RA, Pedroza AD, Flanigan DC, Group M, Kaeding CC (2013) Transtibial ACL femoral tunnel preparation increases odds of repeat ipsilateral knee surgery. J Bone Jt Surg Am 95(22):2035–2042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Morgan JA, Dahm D, Levy B, Stuart MJ, Group MS (2012) Femoral tunnel malposition in ACL revision reconstruction. The journal of knee surgery 25(5):361–368CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bottoni CR, Rooney RC, Harpstrite JK, Kan DM (1998) Ensuring accurate femoral guide pin placement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead, NJ) 27(11):764–766Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    O’Donnell JB, Scerpella TA (1995) Endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: modified technique and radiographic review. Arthrosc: J Arthrosc Relat Surg 11(5):577–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Alentorn-Geli E, Lajara F, Samitier G, Cugat R (2010) The transtibial versus the anteromedial portal technique in the arthroscopic bone-patellar tendon-bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(8):1013–1037CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Guler O, Mahirogullari M, Mutlu S, Cerci MH, Seker A, Cakmak S (2016) Graft position in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: anteromedial versus transtibial technique. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136(11):1571–1580CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tompkins M, Milewski MD, Brockmeier SF, Gaskin CM, Hart JM, Miller MD (2012) Anatomic femoral tunnel drilling in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: use of an accessory medial portal versus traditional transtibial drilling. Am J Sports Med 40(6):1313–1321CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Silva A, Sampaio R, Pinto E (2012) ACL reconstruction: comparison between transtibial and anteromedial portal techniques. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy: official journal of the ESSKA 20(5):896–903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bedi A, Musahl V, Steuber V, Kendoff D, Choi D, Allen AA, Pearle AD, Altchek DW (2011) Transtibial versus anteromedial portal reaming in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an anatomic and biomechanical evaluation of surgical technique. Arthroscopy 27(3):380–390CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Piasecki DP, Bach BR Jr, Espinoza Orias AA, Verma NN (2011) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: can anatomic femoral placement be achieved with a transtibial technique? Am J Sports Med 39(6):1306–1315CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dargel J, Schmidt-Wiethoff R, Fischer S, Mader K, Koebke J, Schneider T (2009) Femoral bone tunnel placement using the transtibial tunnel or the anteromedial portal in ACL reconstruction: a radiographic evaluation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17(3):220–227CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chen Y, Chua KH, Singh A, Tan JH, Chen X, Tan SH, Tai BC, Lingaraj K (2015) Outcome of single-bundle hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the anteromedial versus the transtibial technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arthrosc: J Arthrosc Relat Surg 31(9):1784–1794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Azboy I, Demirtas A, Gem M, Kiran S, Alemdar C, Bulut M (2014) A comparison of the anteromedial and transtibial drilling technique in ACL reconstruction after a short-term follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134(7):963–969CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chalmers PN, Mall NA, Cole BJ, Verma NN, Bush-Joseph CA, Bach BR Jr (2013) Anteromedial versus transtibial tunnel drilling in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions: a systematic review. Arthrosc: J Arthrosc Relat Surg 29(7):1235–1242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Riboh JC, Hasselblad V, Godin JA, Mather RC 3rd (2013) Transtibial versus independent drilling techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Am J Sports Med 41(11):2693–2702CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bedi A, Raphael B, Maderazo A, Pavlov H, Williams RJ 3rd (2010) Transtibial versus anteromedial portal drilling for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric study of femoral tunnel length and obliquity. Arthrosc: J Arthrosc Relat Surg 26(3):342–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lubowitz JH (2009) Anteromedial portal technique for the anterior cruciate ligament femoral socket: pitfalls and solutions. Arthrosc: J Arthrosc Relat Surg 25(1):95–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rahr-Wagner L, Thillemann TM, Pedersen AB, Lind MC (2013) Increased risk of revision after anteromedial compared with transtibial drilling of the femoral tunnel during primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results from the Danish Knee Ligament Reconstruction Register. Arthrosc: J Arthrosc Relat Surg 29(1):98–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bernard M, Hertel P, Hornung H, Cierpinski T (1997) Femoral insertion of the ACL. Radiographic quadrant method. The American journal of knee surgery 10(1):14–21 (discussion 21-12) PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Staubli HU, Rauschning W (1994) Tibial attachment area of the anterior cruciate ligament in the extended knee position. Anatomy and cryosections in vitro complemented by magnetic resonance arthrography in vivo. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2(3):138–146CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zantop T, Wellmann M, Fu FH, Petersen W (2008) Tunnel positioning of anteromedial and posterolateral bundles in anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: anatomic and radiographic findings. Am J Sports Med 36(1):65–72CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sullivan JP, Matava MJ, Flanigan DC, Gao Y, Britton CL, Amendola A, Group M, Wolf BR (2012) Reliability of tunnel measurements and the quadrant method using fluoroscopic radiographs after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 40(10):2236–2241CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Group M (2013) Radiographic findings in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions from the Mars cohort. J Knee Surg 26(4):239–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Garofalo R, Djahangiri A, Siegrist O (2006) Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps tendon-patellar bone autograft. Arthrosc: J Arthrosc Relat Surg 22(2):205–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Abebe ES, Moorman CT 3rd, Dziedzic TS, Spritzer CE, Cothran RL, Taylor DC, Garrett WE Jr, DeFrate LE (2009) Femoral tunnel placement during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an in vivo imaging analysis comparing transtibial and 2-incision tibial tunnel-independent techniques. Am J Sports Med 37(10):1904–1911CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bowers AL, Bedi A, Lipman JD, Potter HG, Rodeo SA, Pearle AD, Warren RF, Altchek DW (2011) Comparison of anterior cruciate ligament tunnel position and graft obliquity with transtibial and anteromedial portal femoral tunnel reaming techniques using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Arthrosc: J Arthrosc Relat Surg 27(11):1511–1522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Musahl V, Plakseychuk A, VanScyoc A, Sasaki T, Debski RE, McMahon PJ, Fu FH (2005) Varying femoral tunnels between the anatomical footprint and isometric positions: effect on kinematics of the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee. Am J Sports Med 33(5):712–718CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Xu Y, Liu J, Kramer S, Martins C, Kato Y, Linde-Rosen M, Smolinski P, Fu FH (2011) Comparison of in situ forces and knee kinematics in anteromedial and high anteromedial bundle augmentation for partially ruptured anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 39(2):272–278CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ahn JH, Lee YS, Jeong HJ, Park JH, Cho Y, Kim KJ, Ko TS (2017) Comparison of transtibial and retrograde outside-in techniques of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in terms of graft nature and clinical outcomes: a case control study using 3T MRI. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137(3):357–365CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vera Jaecker
    • 1
  • Tabea Zapf
    • 1
  • Jan-Hendrik Naendrup
    • 1
  • Thomas Pfeiffer
    • 1
  • Ajay C. Kanakamedala
    • 2
  • Arasch Wafaisade
    • 1
  • Sven Shafizadeh
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Cologne Merheim Medical CentreWitten/Herdecke UniversityCologneGermany
  2. 2.University of Pittsburgh Medical CenterPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations