Advertisement

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

, Volume 136, Issue 12, pp 1717–1721 | Cite as

Management of shoulder instability: the current state of treatment among German orthopaedic surgeons

  • Maurice Balke
  • Sven Shafizadeh
  • Bertil Bouillon
  • Marc Banerjee
Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine

Abstract

Introduction

The aim of this study was to evaluate the current state of treatment in traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation in Germany and to detect changes over the last 12 years.

Methods

Seven hundred ninety-six trauma and/or orthopaedic departments were found in the German hospital directory 2012. The websites of each department were searched for the email address of the responsible shoulder surgeon (if applicable) or the head of the department. Seven hundred forty-six email addresses were found, and emails with the request to participate in an online survey were sent in January 2013. Six hundred seventy-five emails probably reached the correct addressee. Seventy-one emails were rejected, and no contact could be made. One-hundred ninety-one (28 %) participated in the study. The data were compared to similar data from a survey on shoulder dislocation performed in the same department and published in 2001.

Results

After the first-time traumatic shoulder dislocation in patients aged younger than 30 years participating in sports, 14 % of the participants would prefer conservative treatment, 83 % arthroscopic, and 3 % open surgery. When surgery was indicated, arthroscopic Bankart repair was the treatment of choice for 93 % of the participants. In 2001, 27 % had indicated conservative treatment after the first-time shoulder dislocation in active patients younger than 30 years. When surgery was indicated, 66 % had performed arthroscopic and 34 % open stabilization. For the standard arthroscopic Bankart repair without concomitant injuries, 41 % of the participants use two and 54 % three suture anchors. Knotless anchors were preferred by 72 %. In the case of glenoid bone loss greater than 25 %, only 46 % perform a procedure for glenoid bone augmentation. Fifteen percent of the participants always recommended immobilization in external rotation after traumatic first-time shoulder dislocation.

Conclusions

The majority of participants recommend arthroscopic Bankart repair with two or three suture anchors in young persons with the first-time dislocations. Compared to 2001 less recommend conservative treatment, complex “open” surgical procedures are no longer used. The knowledge that a Bankart procedure likely fails in significant glenoid bone loss is not implemented in the clinical practice. Thus, there is a need to educate surgeons on this topic.

Keywords

Bankart Shoulder instability Latarjet Dislocation Arthroscopy 

References

  1. 1.
    Alentorn-Geli E, Alvarez-Diaz P, Doblas J, Steinbacher G, Seijas R, Ares O, Boffa JJ, Cusco X, Cugat R (2016) Return to sports after arthroscopic capsulolabral repair using knotless suture anchors for anterior shoulder instability in soccer players: minimum 5-year follow-up study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24(2):440–446CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Balg F, Boileau P (2007) The instability severity index score. A simple pre-operative score to select patients for arthroscopic or open shoulder stabilisation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(11):1470–1477CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burkhart SS, De Beer JF (2000) Traumatic glenohumeral bone defects and their relationship to failure of arthroscopic Bankart repairs: significance of the inverted-pear glenoid and the humeral engaging Hill–Sachs lesion. Arthroscopy 16(7):677–694CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Heidari K, Asadollahi S, Vafaee R, Barfehei A, Kamalifar H, Chaboksavar ZA, Sabbaghi M (2014) Immobilization in external rotation combined with abduction reduces the risk of recurrence after primary anterior shoulder dislocation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 23(6):759–766CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Itoi E, Hatakeyama Y, Sato T, Kido T, Minagawa H, Yamamoto N, Wakabayashi I, Nozaka K (2007) Immobilization in external rotation after shoulder dislocation reduces the risk of recurrence. A randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(10):2124–2131PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jordan RW, Saithna A, Old J, MacDonald P (2015) Does external rotation bracing for anterior shoulder dislocation actually result in reduction of the labrum? A systematic review. Am J Sports Med 43(9):2328–2333CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kocaoglu B, Guven O, Nalbantoglu U, Aydin N, Haklar U (2009) No difference between knotless sutures and suture anchors in arthroscopic repair of Bankart lesions in collision athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17(7):844–849CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Malhotra A, Freudmann MS, Hay SM (2012) Management of traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation in the 17- to 25-year age group: a dramatic evolution of practice. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21(4):545–553CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Randelli P, Ragone V, Carminati S, Cabitza P (2012) Risk factors for recurrence after Bankart repair a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(11):2129–2138CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tingart M, Bathis H, Bouillon B, Neugebauer E, Tiling T (2001) Surgical therapy of traumatic shoulder dislocation. Are there evidence-based indications for arthroscopic Bankart operation? Unfallchirurg. 104(9):894–901CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tingart M, Bathis H, Bouillon B, Tiling T (2001) Therapy of traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation: current status of therapy in Germany. Are there scientifically verified therapy concepts? Chirurg 72(6):677–683CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Witney-Lagen C, Perera N, Rubin S, Venkateswaran B (2014) Fewer anchors achieves successful arthroscopic shoulder stabilization surgery: 114 patients with 4 years of follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 23(3):382–387CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhang AL, Montgomery SR, Ngo SS, Hame SL, Wang JC, Gamradt SC (2014) Arthroscopic versus open shoulder stabilization: current practice patterns in the United States. Arthroscopy 30(4):436–443CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maurice Balke
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sven Shafizadeh
    • 1
  • Bertil Bouillon
    • 1
  • Marc Banerjee
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Faculty of Health, School of Medicine, Cologne Merheim Medical CenterWitten/Herdecke UniversityCologneGermany
  2. 2.Sportsclinic CologneCenter for SportstraumatologyCologneGermany
  3. 3.Mediapark KlinikCologneGermany

Personalised recommendations