Advertisement

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

, Volume 136, Issue 2, pp 241–247 | Cite as

Comparison of different femoral fixation implants and fit techniques for tunnel widening and clinical outcome in ACL reconstruction using hamstring autograft

  • B. Saygi
  • O. Karaman
  • E. Sirin
  • I. Arslan
  • A. I. Demir
  • A. Oztermeli
Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of the current study is to investigate in different femoral fixation devices whether tight (undersize drilled) fit technique decreases the tunnel widening and improves the clinical outcome compared to conventional technique in ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendon autograft.

Methods

93 patients, who underwent Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction whether cortical-cancellous suspension (CP) or cortical suspension (BF) used as fixation device for the hamstring tendon autograft, were included in the study. The cases also grouped as undersize drilled (tight fit) and normal drilled (normal fit) according to their autograft size. There was no difference in demographic data of these four subgroups (CP-TF, CP-NF, BF-TF, and BF-NF) preoperatively.

Results

The patients, who had been followed for at least 2 years were included in the study. They were looked for their clinical outcome (Lysholm and IKDC scoring), tunnel widening (on AP and lateral radiographs), and also anterior translation. The BF-TF subgroup showed significantly the best clinical results compared to other three subgroups. There was no difference between BF-TF, CP-TF, and CP-NF in terms of tunnel widening.

Conclusion

Button fixation of femoral side in ACL reconstruction surgery has good clinical outcome and lower complication rate. Undersize drilling might be preferred in button fixation in order to reduce TW and improve stability and clinical satisfaction.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic case series, Level IV.

Keywords

ACL Fit Tunnel widening Clinical outcome Femoral fixation methods 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Kong CG, In Y, Kim GH, Ahn CY (2012) Cross pins versus endobutton femoral fixation in hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: minimum 4-year follow-up. Knee Surg Relat Res 24(1):34–39PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hamner DL, Brown CH Jr, Steiner ME, Hecker AT, Hayes WC (1999) Hamstring tendon grafts for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: biomechanical evaluation of the use of multiple strands and tensioning techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81(4):549–557PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    To JT, Howell SM, Hull ML (1999) Contributions of femoral fixation methods to the stiffness of anterior cruciate ligament replacements at implantation. Arthroscopy 15(4):379–387CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hwang DH, Shetty GM, Kim JI, Kwon JH, Song JK, Muñoz M, Lee JS, Nha KW (2013) Does press-fit technique reduce tunnel volume enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autologous hamstring tendons? A prospective randomized computed tomography study. Arthroscopy 29(1):83–88CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Siebold R, Kiss ZS, Morris HG (2008) Effect of compaction drilling during ACL reconstruction with hamstrings on postoperative tunnel widening. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128(5):461–468CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nebelung S, Deitmer G, Gebing R, Reichwein F, Nebelung W (2012) High incidence of tunnel widening after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with transtibial femoral tunnel placement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132(11):1653–1663CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Firat A, Catma F, Tunc B, Hacihafizoglu C, Altay M, Bozkurt M, Kapicioglu MI (2014) The attic of the femoral tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of outcomes of two suspensory femoral fixation systems. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(5):1097–1105CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zantop T, Petersen W (2008) Double bundle revision of a malplaced single bundle vertical ACL reconstruction: ACL revision surgery using a two femoral tunnel technique. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128(11):1287–1294CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fauno P, Kaalund S (2005) Tunnel widening after hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is influenced by the type of graft fixation used: a prospective randomized study. Arthroscopy 21(11):1337–1341CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hoher J, Möller HD, Fu FH (1998) Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: fact or fiction? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6(4):231–240CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Buck DC, Simonian PT, Larson RV, Borrow J, Nathanson DA (2004) Timeline of tibial tunnel expansion after single-incision hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 20(1):34–36CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Price R, Stoney J, Brown G (2010) Prospective randomized comparison of endobutton versus cross-pin femoral fixation in hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with 2-year follow-up. ANZ J Surg 80(3):162–165CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Clark R, Olsen RE, Larson BJ, Goble EM, Farrer RP (1998) Cross-pin femoral fixation: a new technique for hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction of the knee. Arthroscopy 14(3):258–267CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wolf EM (1998) Semitendinosus and gracilis anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the transfix technique. Tech Ortop 13:329–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhai W, Lv C, Zheng Y, Gao Y, Ding Z, Chen Z (2013) Weak link of tendon–bone healing and a control experiment to promote healing. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133(11):1533–1541CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Choi NH, Oh JS, Jung SH, Victoroff BN (2013) Correlation between endobutton loop length and tunnel widening after hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 41(1):101–106CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Buelow JU, Siebold R, Ellermann A (2002) A prospective evaluation of tunnel enlargement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstrings: extracortical versus anatomical fixation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 10(2):80–85CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Majewski M, Susanne H, Klaus S (2006) Epidemiology of athletic knee injuries: a 10-year study. Knee. 13(3):184–188CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Baumfeld JA, Diduch DR, Rubino LJ, Hart JA, Miller MD, Barr MS, Hart JM (2008) Tunnel widening following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autograft: a comparison between double cross-pin and suspensory graft fixation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16(12):1108–1113CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sabat D, Kundu K, Arora S, Kumar V (2011) Tunnel widening after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized computed tomography-based study comparing 2 different femoral fixation methods for hamstring graft. Arthroscopy 27(6):776–783CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jansson KA, Harilainen A, Sandelin J, Karjalainen PT, Aronen HJ, Tallroth K (1999) Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the hamstring autograft and endobutton fixation technique. A clinical, radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging study with 2 years follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7(5):290–295CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Webster KE, Feller JA, Elliott J, Hutchison A, Payne R (2004) A comparison of bone tunnel measurements made using computed tomography and digital plain radiography after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 20(9):946–950CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ganko A, Engebretsen L, Ozer H (2000) The rolimeter: a new arthrometer compared with the KT-1000. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 8(1):36–39CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schuster AJ, McNicholas MJ, Wachtl SW, McGurty DW, Jakob RP (2004) A new mechanical testing device for measuring anteroposterior knee laxity. Am J Sports Med 32(7):1731–1735CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ballal MS, Khan Y, Hastie G, Hatcher A, Coogan S, McNicholas MJ (2013) Functional outcome of primary hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients with different body mass index classes. Arthroscopy 29(8):1314–1321CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sinha S, Naik AK, Meena D, Jain VK, Arya RK (2014) Creation of femoral tunnel by outside-in technique for ACL reconstruction: an analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134(12):1709–1716CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Saygi
    • 1
    • 2
  • O. Karaman
    • 1
  • E. Sirin
    • 1
  • I. Arslan
    • 1
  • A. I. Demir
    • 1
  • A. Oztermeli
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryFatih Sultan Mehmet Teaching and Research HospitalIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Orthopedics and TraumatologyTCSB Fatih Sultan Mehmet EAHAtasehir, IstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations