Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

, Volume 135, Issue 10, pp 1445–1451 | Cite as

Proximalize osteotomy of tibial tuberosity (POTT) as a treatment for stiffness secondary to patella baja in total knee arthroplasty (TKA)

  • M. A. Vives-Barquiel
  • A. Torrents
  • L. Lozano
  • J. C. Martínez-Pastor
  • F. Maculé
  • J. M. Segur
  • D. Popescu
Knee Revision Surgery

Abstract

Introduction

Stiffness after a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most common post-operative complications. The purpose of this study is the evaluation of the effectiveness of TT proximalization osteotomy of improving a lack of flexion and secondary pain in patella baja (infera) post-TKA.

Materials and methods

Between April 2007 and July 2012, TT proximalization osteotomy was performed on 21 patients. The average preoperative flexion was 70° (in a range of 60–80). Clinical pre- and post-operative evaluations were performed with Knee Society Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index scales and a satisfaction survey. Modified Blackburn-Peel index and Portner angle were used to evaluate patellar height.

Results

After an average follow-up of 35 months (range 18–48), an average flexion of 100° (range 90–100) and an overall satisfaction were obtained. Clinical scores improved significantly. The Blackburn-Peel index and Portner angle improved significantly from 0.3 (range 0.1–0.5) to 0.4 (0.3–0.5) and from 9 (3–15) to 12 (9–18), respectively. Three patients showed no signs of osteotomy consolidation. However, this was not linked to a lack of extension or an increase in local pain.

Conclusion

TT proximalization osteotomy provides satisfactory results in improving a lack of flexion and pain in patella baja post-TKR.

Keywords

Tibial tuberosity osteotomy TKA Knee stiffness 

References

  1. 1.
    Ortega M, Barco R, Rodríguez EC (2002) Artroplastia total de rodilla. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol 46(5):476–484Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Narkbunnam R, Chareancholvanich K (2012) Causes of failure in total knee arthroplasty. J Med Assoc Thai 95(5):667–673PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brassard MF, Insall JN, Scuderi GR (2001) Complications of total knee arhtroplasty. In: Insall JN, Scott WN (eds) Surgery of the knee, 3rd edn. Churchill Livingston, New York, pp 1801–1844Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kim J, Nelson CL, Lotke PA (2004) Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty. Prevalence of the complication and outcomes of revision. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(7):1479–1484Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bong MR, Di Cesare PE (2004) Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 12:164–171PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chonko DJ, Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR (2004) Patella baja and total knee arthroplasty (TKA): etiology, diagnosis, and management. Surg Technol Int 12:231–238PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sabshin N, Schneitzer ME, Morrison WB, Parker L (2004) MRI criteria for patella alta and baja. Skelet Radiol 33(8):445–450Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Drexler M, Dwyer T, Marmor M, Sternheim A, Cameron HU, Cameron JC (2013) The treatment of acquired patella baja with proximalize the tibial tuberosity. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(11):2578–2583CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grelsamer RP (2002) Patella baja after total knee arthroplasty. Is it really a patella baja? J Arthroplasty 17(1):66–69CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Flören M, Davis J, Peterson G, Laskin RS (2007) A mini-midvastus capsular approach with patellar displacement decreases the prevalence of patella baja. J Artroplasty 22((6 suppl.2)):51–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Koshino T, Ejima M, Okamoto R, Morii T (1990) Gradual low riding of the patella during postoperative course after TKA in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. J Arthroplasty 5(4):323–327CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Weale AE, Murray DW, Newman JH, Ackroyd CE (1999) The length of the patellar tendon after unicompartimental and TK replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81(5):790–795CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jawhar A, Sohoni S, Shah V, Scharf HP (2014) Alteration of the patellar height following total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134(1):91–97CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Caton JH, Dejour D (2010) Tibial tubercle osteotomy in patello-femoral instability and in patellar height abnormality. Int Orthop 34(2):305–309PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tabutin J, Morin-Salvo N, Torga-Spak R, Cambas PM, Vogt F (2011) Tibial tubercule osteotomy during medial approach to difficult knee arthroplasties. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97(3):276–286CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Berg EE, Mason SL, Lucas MJ (1996) Patellar height ratios. A comparison of four measurement methods. Am J Sports Med 24(2):218–221CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Seil R, Muller B, Georg T, Kohn D, Rupp S (2000) Reliability and interobserver variability in radiological patellar height ratios. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 8(4):231–236CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Portner O, Pakzad H (2011) The evaluation of patellar height: a simple method. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(1):73–80CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kazemi SM, Daftari L, Eajazi A, Miniator MR, Okhovatpoor MA, Farhang R et al (2011) Pseudo-patella baja after TKA. Med Sci Monit 17(5):292–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Paulos LE, Wnorowski DC, Greenwald AE (1994) Infrapatellar contracture syndrome. Diagnosis, treatment, and long-term followup. Am J Sports Med 22(4):440–449CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Correia J, Sieder M, Kendoff D, Citak M, Gehrke T, Klauser W et al (2012) Secondary patellar resurfacing after primary bicondylar knee arthroplasty did not meet patients’ expectations. Open Orthop J 6:414–418PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Muñoz-Mahamud E, Popescu D, Nuñez E, Lozano LM, Nuñez M, Sastre S et al (2011) Secondary patellar resurfacing in the treatment of patellofemoral pain after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(9):1467–1472CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Davis K, Caldwell P, Wayne J, Jiranek WA (2000) Mechanical comparison of fixation techniques for the tibial osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 380:241–249CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Caldwell PE, Bohlen BA, Owen JR, Brown MM, Harris B, Wayne J (2004) Dynamic confirmation of the fixation techniques of the tibial tubercle osteotomy. Clin Orthop 424:173–179CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Van den Broek CM, van Hellemont GG, Jacob WCH, Wymenga AB (2006) Step-cut tibial tubercle osteotomy for access in revision total knee replacement. Knee 13:430–434CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Della Valle CJ, Berger RA, Rosenberg AG (2006) Surgical exposure in revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 446:59–68CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. A. Vives-Barquiel
    • 1
  • A. Torrents
    • 2
  • L. Lozano
    • 3
  • J. C. Martínez-Pastor
    • 3
  • F. Maculé
    • 3
  • J. M. Segur
    • 1
  • D. Popescu
    • 3
  1. 1.Resident Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery DepartmentHospital Clínic BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.IDIBAPSBarcelonaSpain
  3. 3.Knee UnitHospital Clínic BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations