Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

, Volume 135, Issue 11, pp 1567–1570 | Cite as

Gender differences in the accuracy of joint line tenderness for arthroscopically confirmed meniscal tears

  • Barak Haviv
  • Shlomo Bronak
  • Yona Kosashvili
  • Rafael Thein
Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine



The reliability of joint line tenderness was previously investigated among other clinical tests for the diagnosis of meniscal pathology with variable results. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the accuracy of joint line tenderness as a clinical diagnosing test for arthroscopically confirmed meniscal tears between males and females.

Materials and methods

For the purpose of preoperative joint line tenderness accuracy calculations, this study included male and female groups of patients who have had knee arthroscopy following preoperative diagnosis of meniscal tear. Overall, 195 patients were included in the study, 134 males and 61 females. The mean age was 43.4 (13–76) years.


In the male group, the diagnosis of meniscal tear by joint line tenderness was correct in 84 (62.7 %) of 134 knees for the medial side and in 115 (85.8 %) for the lateral side. In the female group, the diagnosis was correct in 35 (57.4 %) of 61 knees for the medial side and in 57 (93.4 %) for the lateral side. In order to refine the accuracy of medial joint line tenderness, the data were recalculated for patients with medial meniscal tears and no chondral lesion or cruciate ligament tears; however, the accuracy remained low.


The physical finding of joint line tenderness of the knee as a test for lateral meniscal tear was found reliable in both males and females. For medial meniscal tears, the test had low reliability and thus less useful if used alone, in both genders.


Joint line tenderness Knee Meniscus Accuracy 


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no financial relationships.


  1. 1.
    Galli M, Ciriello V, Menghi A, Aulisa AG, Rabini A, Marzetti E (2013) Joint line tenderness and McMurray tests for the detection of meniscal lesions: what is their real diagnostic value? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 94(6):1126–1131CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Malanga GA, Andrus S, Nadler SF, McLean J (2003) Physical examination of the knee: a review of the original test description and scientific validity of common orthopedic tests. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84(4):592–603CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Scholten RJ, Deville WL, Opstelten W, Bijl D, van der Plas CG, Bouter LM (2001) The accuracy of physical diagnostic tests for assessing meniscal lesions of the knee: a meta-analysis. J FamPract 50:938–944Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fowler PJ, Lubliner JA (1989) The predictive value of five clinical signs in the evaluation of meniscal pathology. Arthroscopy 5:184–186CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Akseki D, Ozcan O, Boya H, Pinar H (2004) A new weight-bearing meniscal test and a comparison with McMurray’s test and joint line tenderness. Arthroscopy 20(9):951–958CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Karachalios T, Hantes M, Zibis AH, Zachos V, Karantanas AH, Malizos KN (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of a new clinical test (the Thessaly test) for early detection of meniscal tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(5):955–962CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eren OT (2003) The accuracy of joint line tenderness by physical examination in the diagnosis of meniscal tears. Arthroscopy 19:850–854CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brittberg M, Winalski CS (2003) Evaluation of cartilage injuries and repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85(Suppl 2):58–69PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Oberlander MA, Shalvoy RM, Hughston JC (1993) The accuracy of the clinical knee examination documented by arthroscopy. A prospective study. Am J Sports Med 21:773–778CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barak Haviv
    • 1
    • 2
  • Shlomo Bronak
    • 1
  • Yona Kosashvili
    • 2
    • 3
  • Rafael Thein
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Arthroscopy and Sports Injuries UnitHasharon Hospital, Rabin Medical CenterPetach-TikvaIsrael
  2. 2.Orthopedic Department, Sackler Faculty of MedicineTel-Aviv UniversityTel-AvivIsrael
  3. 3.Orthopedic DepartmentBeilinson Hospital, Rabin Medical CenterPetach-TikvaIsrael

Personalised recommendations