Urinary incontinence and poor functional status in fragility fracture patients: an underrecognized and underappreciated association
- 541 Downloads
Urinary incontinence (UI) affects some 20 % of community-dwelling older people and 30–60 % of people in institutional care. UI is known as an independent predictor of falls, and likely impacts fracture rates. The aim of the study was to measure the prevalence of UI in a typical fragility fracture population, to evaluate the relationship of UI with functional disability in the post-acute setting.
Our study is a retrospective cross-sectional study of patients admitted to rehabilitation setting after inpatient hospital management for a fragility fracture. We included all consecutively admitted fragility fracture patients aged over 65. All patients underwent standard clinical examination and Geriatric Assessment. We assessed UI using a two-stage process with a six-item UI screening questionnaire followed by an interview.
1,857 (80.7 % female) patients were available for analysis, mean age was 81.7 years. UI was identified in 59.2 % of all fragility fracture patients, and was more prevalent in females. Patients suffering from UI differed significantly in almost all measured functional and cognitive tests, with increased dependency/lower ADL scores, increased rates of immobility, and higher rates of cognitive dysfunction and depression.
This study confirms the high prevalence of UI in older fragility fracture patients, and the association between UI and functional impairments. The diagnostic work-up and treatment of patients should be focused on the special needs of these older patients. More efforts are needed to increase awareness about prevalence and consequences of UI among older fragility fracture patients.
KeywordsFragility fracture Urinary incontinence Disability Older Geriatric assessment
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest.
- 3.Marks R (2011) Physical activity and hip fracture disability: a review. J Aging Res 741918Google Scholar
- 17.Ouslander JG, Johnson TM (1999) Inconetinence. In: Hazzard WR, Blass JP, Ettinger WH et al (eds). Principles of geriatric medicine and gerontology, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 1595–1613Google Scholar
- 25.Khandelwal C, Kistler C (2013) Diagnosis of Urinary Incontinence. Ann Fam Physician 87(8):543–550Google Scholar
- 26.Pils K, Umek W (2014). Harninkontinenz der älteren Frau, Leitfaden für Abklärung und Therapie,Urinary incontinence, Guideline for diagnosis and treatment, Facultas, ISBN 978-3-7089-1141-0, S 10Google Scholar
- 27.Abrams P, Andersson KE, Birder L, Brubaker L, Cardozo L, Chapple C, Cottenden A, Davila W, de Ridder D, Dmochowski R, Drake M, Dubeau C, Fry C, Hanno P, Smith JH, Herschorn S, Hosker G, Kelleher C, Koelbl H, Khoury S, Madoff R, Milsom I, Moore K, Newman D, Nitti V, Norton C, Nygaard I, Payne C, Smith A, Staskin D, Tekgul S, Thuroff J, Tubaro A, Vodusek D, Wein A, Wyndaele JJ, Members of Committees, Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence (2010) Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence Recommendations of the International Scientific Committee: evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and fecal incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 29(1):213–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.Guigoz Y, Garry JP (1994) Mini nutritional assessment: A practical assessment tool for grading the nutritional state of elderly patients. Facts Res Gerontol. pp 15–59Google Scholar