Advertisement

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

, Volume 134, Issue 11, pp 1545–1550 | Cite as

Treatment of fracture sequelae of the proximal humerus: comparison of hemiarthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

  • Eduard Alentorn-Geli
  • Pau Guirro
  • Fernando Santana
  • Carles Torrens
Trauma Surgery

Abstract

Introduction

Fracture sequelae (FS) of the proximal humerus is a challenging scenario in shoulder surgery. Despite they have been traditionally treated with hemiarthroplasty (HA), the use of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has been recently introduced. However, there are no studies comparing the results of HA and RSA in FS. The purpose of this study was to compare the functional and quality of life-related outcomes, and complications in the treatment of proximal humeral FS between HA and RSA.

Materials and methods

A therapeutic prospective non-randomized comparative study was conducted. All consecutive patients with diagnosis of FS after non-operative treatment of proximal humeral fractures and no previous shoulder surgery were considered for this study. A total of 32 patients (24 females, 8 males) with a mean (SD) age at the time of surgery of 80.1 (4.9) years were finally included: 12 in the HA group, and 20 in the RSA group. FS were treated with shoulder arthroplasty by the implantation of either HA or RSA. Constant score (total and specific items), quality of life (assessed through SF-36), and complications requiring revision surgery were compared between groups.

Results

All parameters of the Constant score significantly improved in the postoperative compared to preoperative period when considering the entire sample. The RSA group demonstrated a higher improvement in total Constant score (p = 0.06) and Constant activity level (p = 0.02) compared to the HA group. The HA demonstrated a higher number of complications compared to the RSA (p = 0.05). There were no differences in SF-36 scores between both groups.

Conclusions

The shoulder arthroplasty is an effective treatment for FS with significant improvement in pain and function. The RSA may be a better option than HA for FS given the trend towards better total Constant score and a significantly lower number of complications requiring revision surgery.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic level II evidence.

Keywords

Fracture sequelae Proximal humerus Treatment Hemiarthroplasty Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty 

Notes

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Antuña SA, Sperling JW, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Cofield RH (2002) Shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral malunions: long-term results. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11:122–129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Antuña SA, Sperling JW, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Cofield RH (2002) Shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral nonunions. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11:114–121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boileau P, Chuinard C, Le Huec JC, Walch G, Trojani C (2006) Proximal humerus fracture sequelae. Impact of a new radiographic classification on arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 442:121–130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boileau P, Krishnan SG, Tinsi L, Walch G, Coste JS, Mole D (2002) Tuberosity malposition and migration: reasons for poor outcomes after hemiarthroplasty for displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11:401–412PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boileau P, Watkinson D, Hatzidakis AM, Hovorka I (2006) Neer Award 2005: the Grammont reverse shoulder prosthesis: results in cuff tear arthritis, fracture sequelae, and revision arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 15:527–540PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boyle MJ, Youn SM, Frampton CM, Ball CM (2013) Functional outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty compared with hemiarthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 22:32–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brorson S, Rasmussen JV, Olsen BS, Frich LH, Jensen SL, Hrobjartsson A (2013) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty in acute fractures of the proximal humerus: a systematic review. Int J Shoulder Surg 7:70–78PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cuff DJ, Pupello DR (2013) Comparison of hemiarthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in the elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:2050–2055PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dines DM, Klarren RF, Altchek DW, Moeckel B (1993) Posttraumatic changes of the proximal humerus: malunion, nonunion, and osteonecrosis. Treatment with modular hemiarthroplasty or total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2:11–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Duquin TR, Jacobson JA, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Sperling J, Cofield RH (2012) Unconstrained shoulder arthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral nonunions. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:1610–1617PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Favard L, Levigne C, Nerot C, Gerber C, De Wilde L, Mole D (2011) Reverse prostheses in arthropathies with cuff tear: are survivorship and function maintained over time? Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:2469–2475PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gadea F, Alami G, Pape G, Boileau P, Favard L (2012) Shoulder hemiarthroplasty: outcomes and long-term survival analysis according to etiology. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 98:659–665PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gallinet D, Clappaz P, Garbuio P, Tropet Y, Obert L (2009) Three or four parts complex proximal humerus fractures: hemiarthroplasty versus reverse prosthesis: a comparative study of 40 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 95:48–55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Katolik LI, Romeo AA, Cole BJ, Verma NN, Hayden JK, Bach BR (2005) Normalization of the Constant score. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 14:279–285PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kiliç M, Berth A, Blatter G, Fuhrmann U, Gebhardt K, Rott O, Zenz P, Irlenbusch U (2010) Anatomic and reverse shoulder prostheses in fracture sequelae of the humeral head. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 44:417–425PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kontakis GM, Tosounidis T, Galanakis I, Megas P (2008) Prosthetic replacement for proximal humeral fractures. Injury 39:1345–1358PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mansat P, Guity MR, Bellumore Y, Mansat M (2004) Shoulder arthroplasty for late sequeale of proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 13:305–312PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Marsh JL, Slongo TF, Agel J, Broderick JS, Creevey W, DeCoster TA, Prokuski L, Sirkin MS, Ziran B, Henley B, Audigé L (2007) Fracture and dislocation classification compendium—2007: orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee. J Orthop Trauma 21:S1–S133PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Martin TG, Iannotti JP (2008) Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for acute fractures and failed management after proximal humeral fractures. Orthop Clin North Am 39:451–457PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Martinez AA, Bejarano C, Carbonel I, Iglesias D, Gil-Alvaroba J, Herrera A (2012) The treatment of proximal humerus nonunions in older patients with the reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Injury 43:S3–S6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Martinez AA, Calvo A, Bejarano C, Carbonel I, Herrera A (2012) The use of the Lima reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of fracture sequelae of the proximal humerus. J Orthop Sci 17:141–147PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mata-Fink A, Meinke M, Jones C, Kim B, Bell JE (2013) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures in older adults: a systematic reivew. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 22:1737–1748PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Moineau G, McClelland WB, Trojani C, Rumian A, Walch G, Boileau P (2012) Prognostic factors and limitations of anatomic shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of posttraumatic cephalic collapse or necrosis (Type-1 proximal humeral fracture sequelae). J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:2186–2194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Namdari S, Horneff JG, Baldwin K (2013) Comparison of hemiarthroplasty and reverse arthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures. A systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:1701–1708PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Panagopoulos A, Tsoumpos P, Evangelou K, Georgiou C, Triantafillopoulos I (2013) Late prosthetic shoulder hemiarthroplasty after failed management of complex proximal humeral fractures. Adv Orthop 2013:403580. doi: 10.1155/2013/403580 PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Reuther F, Mühlhäusler B, Wahl D, Nijs S (2010) Functional outcome of shoulder hemiarthroplasty for fractures: a multicentre analysis. Injury 41:606–612PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Singer BR, McLauchlan GJ, Robinson CM, Christie J (1998) Epidemiology of fractures in 15,000 adults: the influence of age and gender. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:243–248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tepass A, Rolauffs B, Weise K, Bahrs SD, Dietz K, Bahrs C (2013) Complication rates and outcomes stratified by treatment modalities in proximal humeral fractures: a systematic literature review from 1970 to 2009. Patient Saf Surg 7:34PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Torrens C, Corrales M, Vilà G, Santana F, Cáceres E (2011) Functional and quality-of-life results of displaced and nondisplaced proximal humeral fractures treated conservatively. J Orthop Trauma 25:581–587PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Vallier HA (2007) Treatment of proximal humerus fractures. J Orthop Trauma 21:469–476PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wellmann M, Struck M, Pastor MF, Gettmann A, Windhagen H, Smith T (2013) Short and midterm results of reverse shoulder arthroplasty according to the preoperative etiology. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133:463–471PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Willis M, Min W, Brooks JP, Mulieri P, Walker M, Pupello D, Frankle M (2012) Proximal humeral malunion treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21:507–513PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eduard Alentorn-Geli
    • 1
  • Pau Guirro
    • 1
  • Fernando Santana
    • 1
  • Carles Torrens
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Parc de Salut Mar, Hospital del Mar & Hospital de l’EsperançaUniversitat Autonoma de Barcelona (UAB)BarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations