Advertisement

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

, Volume 134, Issue 11, pp 1579–1585 | Cite as

Suspensory fixation versus novel transverse crosspin for femoral fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

  • Sinan Zehir
  • Regayip Zehir
Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine

Abstract

Background and aim

There is still no gold standard technique for graft fixation during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. We compared the functional outcomes of patients receiving either ToggleLoc with ZipLoop technology or Translig transverse crosspin device for femoral graft fixation.

Materials and methods

A total of 118 patients were randomly allocated into two groups to receive either Translig® transverse crosspin (Translig group 1: n = 51, mean age 28.34 ± 7.83 years, age 18–40 years) or ToggleLoc with ZipLoop technology (ToggleLoc group: n = 67, mean age 26.85 ± 8.76, age 16-41 years) for femoral graft fixation. Early and 1-year assessment was made with Lysholm knee scale, International Knee Documentation Committee Scoring, Tegner Activity Level Scale, KT-1000 arthrometer and pivot shift test.

Results

Preoperative vs. postoperative functional parameters showed significant improvement in both groups. Two groups were similar in terms of Lysholm knee scale, IKDC and Tegner activity scores (p > 0.05). The KT-1000 arthrometer revealed slightly less anterior sliding in Translig group than that in ToggleLoc group (p > 0.05). ToggleLoc technique allowed a radiographically more horizontal placement of the graft than Translig technique.

Conclusion

Two distinct techniques used in this study are likely to be suitable for femoral graft fixation during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the femoral tunnel being created via anteromedial approach.

Keywords

Anterior cruciate ligament Transverse crosspin Anteromedial portal 

Notes

Conflict of interest

None declared.

References

  1. 1.
    Moses B, Orchard J, Orchard J (2012) Systematic review: annual incidence of ACL injury and surgery in various populations. Res Sports Med 20(3–4):157–179PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Spindler KP, Parker RD, Andrish JT, Kaeding CC, Wright RW, Marx RG et al (2013) Prognosis and predictors of ACL reconstructions using the MOON cohort: a model for comparative effectiveness studies. J Orthop Res 31:2–9PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mohtadi NG, Chan DS, Dainty KN, Whelan DB (2011) Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (9):CD005960Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Firat A, Catma F, Tunc B, Hacihafizoglu C, Altay M, Bozkurt M et al (2014) The attic of the femoral tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of outcomes of two suspensory femoral fixation systems. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:1097–1105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rylander L, Brunelli J, Taylor M, Baldini T, Ellis B, Hawkins M et al (2014) A biomechanical comparison of anterior cruciate ligament suspensory fixation devices in a porcine cadaver model. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 29:230–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eguchi A, Ochi M, Adachi N, Deie M, Nakamae A, Usman MA (2014) Mechanical properties of suspensory fixation devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of the fixed-length loop device versus the adjustable-length loop device. Knee. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2014.02.009
  7. 7.
    Gifstad T, Drogset JO, Grøntvedt T, Hortemo GS (2013) Femoral fixation of hamstring tendon grafts in ACL reconstructions: the 2-year follow-up results of a prospective randomized controlled study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc (Epub ahead of print)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Firat A, Catma F, Tunc B, Hacihafizoglu C, Altay M, Bozkurt M, Kapicioglu MI (2014) The attic of the femoral tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of outcomes of two suspensory femoral fixation systems. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:1097–1105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nebelung S, Deitmer G, Gebing R, Reichwein F, Nebelung W (2012) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using biodegradable transfemoral fixation at 5-year follow-up: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging evaluation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:2279–2286PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kruse LM, Gray B, Wright RW (2012) Rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94(19):1737–1748PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee JJ, Otarodifard K, Jun BJ, McGarry MH, Hatch GF 3rd, Lee TQ (2011) Is supplementary fixation necessary in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions? Am J Sports Med 39:360–365PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Colvin A, Sharma C, Parides M, Glashow J (2011) What is the best femoral fixation of hamstring autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:1075–1081PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Petre BM, Smith SD, Jansson KS, de Meijer PP, Hackett TR, LaPrade RF et al (2013) Femoral cortical suspension devices for soft tissue anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparative biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med 41(2):416–422PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Conner CS, Perez BA, Morris RP, Buckner JW, Buford WL Jr, Ivey FM (2010) Three femoral fixation devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of fixation on the lateral cortex versus the anterior cortex. Arthroscopy 26:796–807PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Silva A, Sampaio R, Fernandes R, Pinto E (2014) Is there a role for adult non-cultivated bone marrow stem cells in ACL reconstruction? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:66–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dorozhkin SV (2011) Biocomposites and hybrid biomaterials based on calcium orthophosphates. Biomatter 1(1):3–56. doi: 10.4161/biom.1.1.16782 PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Asik M, Sen C, Tuncay I, Erdil M, Avci C, Taser OF (2007) The mid- to long-term results of the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendons using Transfix technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:965–972PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nebelung S, Deitmer G, Gebing R, Reichwein F, Nebelung W (2012) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using biodegradable transfemoral fixation at 5-year follow-up: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging evaluation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:2279–2286PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Choi NH, Son KM, Yoo SY, Victoroff BN (2012) Femoral tunnel widening after hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bioabsorbable transfix. Am J Sports Med 40:383–387PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sawyer GA, Anderson BC, Paller D, Heard WM, Fadale PD (2013) Effect of interference screw fixation on ACL graft tensile strength. J Knee Surg 26:155–159PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Barrow AE, Pilia M, Guda T, Kadrmas WR, Burns TC (2014) Femoral suspension devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: do adjustable loops lengthen? Am J Sports Med 42:343–349PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Orthopedic and Traumatology ClinicHitit University Research and Training HospitalMerkezTurkey
  2. 2.Carsamba State HospitalSamsunTurkey

Personalised recommendations