Percutaneous cerclage wiring followed by intramedullary nailing for subtrochanteric femoral fractures: a technical note with clinical results
Although intramedullary nailing is an ideal treatment for subtrochanteric femoral fractures, it is technically challenging in fractures extending into the nail entry area and/or involving the lesser trochanter. Although the application of circumferential wire may facilitate reduction in these situations, its use remains controversial due to possible blood supply disturbances to underlying bone. In the present study, we evaluated complex subtrochanteric fractures treated by percutaneous cerclage wiring followed by intramedullary (IM) nailing for anatomical fracture reduction and union.
Twelve patients (mean age 48.3 years) with an unstable subtrochanteric fracture were prospectively treated. Indications of percutaneous cerclage wiring followed by IM nailing were a fracture extending proximally into the nail entry area deemed difficult to treat by anatomical reconstruction by IM nailing or a fracture with long oblique or spiral component. One or two cerclage wires were percutaneously applied for the temporary reduction of main fragments, and then, a cephalo-medullary or a reconstruction nail was fixed. We assessed radiologic results (union time, alignment), functional results, and complications.
All 12 cases healed, without a bone graft, at an average of 19.1 weeks after surgery (range 16–24). In 11 cases, acceptable alignment was achieved (mean, valgus 0.3° extension 0.6°) with minimal leg-length discrepancy; the other exhibited 1 cm of shortening. All patients were able to return to pre-injury activity levels, and median Merle d’Aubigne score was 16.9 (15–18). No infection or implant-related complication was encountered to latest follow-up (minimum 12 months postoperatively).
Temporary reduction by percutaneous wiring offers a means of satisfactory nailing in difficult subtrochanteric femoral fractures, and affords anatomical reconstruction and favorable bony union.
KeywordsSubtrochanteric femoral fractures Percutaneous wiring Intramedullary nailing
Conflict of interest
All authors have certified that they have no commercial associations (e.g., consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with this article.
- 4.Ban I, Birkelund L, Palm H, Brix M, Troelsen A (2012) Circumferential wires as a supplement to intramedullary nailing in unstable trochanteric hip fractures: 4 reoperations in 60 patients followed for 1 year. Acta Orthop 83:240–243. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.665329 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Starr AJ, Hay MT, Reinert CM, Borer DS, Christensen KC (2006) Cephalomedullary nails in the treatment of high-energy proximal femur fractures in young patients: a prospective, randomized comparison of trochanteric versus piriformis fossa entry portal. J Orthop Trauma 20:240–246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Oh CW, Kim JJ, Byun YS, Oh JK, Kim JW, Kim SY, Park BC, Lee HJ (2009) Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of subtrochanteric femur fractures with a locking plate: a prospective series of 20 fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129:1659–1665. doi: 10.1007/s00402-009-0815-y PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Wieser K, Babst R (2010) Fixation failure of the LCP proximal femoral plate 4.5/5.0 in patients with missing posteromedial support in unstable per-, inter-, and subtrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130:1281–1287. doi: 10.1007/s00402-010-1074-7 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Müller T, Topp T, Kühne CA, Gebhart G, Ruchholtz S, Zettl R (2011) The benefit of wire cerclage stabilisation of the medial hinge in intramedullary nailing for the treatment of subtrochanteric femoral fractures: a biomechanical study. Int Orthop 35:1237–1243. doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-1204-4 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar