Advertisement

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

, Volume 134, Issue 7, pp 985–990 | Cite as

Fatty degeneration and atrophy of the rotator cuff muscles after arthroscopic repair: does it improve, halt or deteriorate?

  • Gokmen Deniz
  • Ozkan Kose
  • Ali Tugay
  • Ferhat Guler
  • Adil Turan
Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the changes in fatty degeneration and atrophy of rotator cuff muscles after arthroscopic repair. We further assessed the factors affecting the functional outcomes and integrity of the rotator cuff.

Materials and methods

One hundred and two prospectively followed patients who underwent single-row arthroscopic repair for full-thickness rotator cuff tears between 2008 and 2010 in our institution were included. All patients underwent shoulder MRI examination before the arthroscopic repair and at the final follow-up at least 2 years after the surgical repair. Supraspinatus muscle atrophy was measured and evaluated according to the Thomazeau classification. The fatty degeneration of the cuff muscles was graded according to the Goutallier classification. Functional outcomes were assessed with the Constant shoulder score. The changes in fatty degeneration and atrophy were analyzed during the treatment period. Correlation coefficients (Pearson r) and stepwise, multiple linear regression were used to determine the relationship between the outcome variables (final Constant score and integrity of the cuff), and the predictor variables, age, sex, follow-up duration, initial muscle atrophy, final muscle atrophy, initial fatty degeneration and final fatty degeneration.

Results

Of the 102 patients reviewed, 87 patients responded and concluded the final clinical follow-up and MRI examination (85.2 % follow-up rate). There were 67 females and 20 males with a mean age of 62.5 ± 8.3 years (range 40–80 years). Mean follow-up period was 30.1 ± 5.8 months (range 24–43 months). At the final follow-up, the mean Constant shoulder score was 94.2 ± 8.2 (range 70–100), and 66 (75.9 %) patients rated as excellent, 14 (16.1 %) as good, and 7 (8.0 %) as fair. No patient had poor results. There was re-rupture in 26 (29.9 %) patients on final MRI examination. No patient had improvement in muscle atrophy and fatty degeneration. The atrophic changes between intact tendon and re-rupture cases were statistically similar (p = 0.300). The deterioration of fatty degeneration was significantly higher in the re-rupture group (p = 0.0001). The Constant shoulder score was significantly lower in patients with re-rupture (97.4 ± 5.0 versus 86.6 ± 9.3, p = 0.001).Multiple stepwise regression analysis showed that the Constant score was dependent on the final integrity of the tendon and the size of the tear (R 2 0.420, p 0.001). The final integrity of the tendon was dependent on the age of the patient, initial and final fatty degeneration of the cuff muscles and the size of the tear (R 2 0.669, p 0.001).

Conclusion

Initial muscle atrophy and fatty degeneration did not improve even after a successful rotator cuff repair where the tendon anatomic integrity was maintained for at least 2 years. It may continue to deteriorate, and the best possibility was preservation of the preoperative status. On the other hand, in cases of re-rupture, fatty degeneration and atrophy continued to worsen significantly. The factors affecting tendon integrity were found to be the age of the patient, the size of the tear and the severity of preoperative fatty degeneration in the rotator cuff.

Keywords

Rotator cuff Supraspinatus muscle Fatty degeneration Rotator cuff atrophy 

Notes

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Gramstad DG, Yamaguchi K (2011) Anatomy, pathogenesis, natural history, and nonsurgical treatment of rotator cuff disorders. In: Galatz LM (ed) OKU 3 Shoulder and elbow. AAOS, Rosemont, pp 149–159Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Matsen FA, Titelman RM, Lippitt SB, Wirth MA, Rockwood CA (2004) Rotator Cuff. In: Rockwood CA, Matsen FA, Writh MA, Lippitt SB (eds) The shoulder. Saunders, Pennsylvania, pp 795–878Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goutallier D, Postel JM, Bernageau J, Lavau L, Voisin MC (1994) Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures. Pre- and postoperative evaluation by CT scan. Clin Orthop Relat Res 304:78–83PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rubino LJ, Stills HF Jr, Sprott DC, Crosby LA (2007) Fatty infiltration of the torn rotator cuff worsens over time in a rabbit model. Arthroscopy 23(7):717–722PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim HM, Galatz LM, Lim C, Havlioglu N, Thomopoulos S (2012) The effect of tear size and nerve injury on rotator cuff muscle fatty degeneration in a rodent animal model. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21(7):847–858PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Laron D, Samagh SP, Liu X, Kim HT, Feeley BT (2012) Muscle degeneration in rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21(2):164–174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kang JR, Gupta R (2012) Mechanisms of fatty degeneration in massive rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21(2):175–180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fuchs B, Weishaupt D, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Gerber C (1999) Fatty degeneration of the muscles of the rotator cuff: assessment by computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 8(6):599–605PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thomazeau H, Boukobza E, Morcet N, Chaperon J, Langlais F (1997) Prediction of rotator cuff repair results by magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Orthop Relat Res 344:275–283PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goutallier D, Postel JM, Gleyze P, Leguilloux P, Van Driessche S (2003) Influence of cuff muscle fatty degeneration on anatomic and functional outcomes after simple suture of full-thickness tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 12(6):550–554PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gladstone JN, Bishop JY, Lo IK, Flatow EL (2007) Fatty infiltration and atrophy of the rotator cuff do not improve after rotator cuff repair and correlate with poor functional outcome. Am J Sports Med 35(5):719–728PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Harryman DT 2nd, Mack LA, Wang KY, Jackins SE, Richardson ML, Matsen FA 3rd (1991) Repairs of the rotator cuff. Correlation of functional results with integrity of the cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73(7):982–989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    DeOrio JK, Cofield RH (1984) Results of a second attempt at surgical repair of a failed initial rotator-cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66(4):563–567PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yamaguchi H, Suenaga N, Oizumi N, Hosokawa Y, Kanaya F (2012) Will preoperative atrophy and Fatty degeneration of the shoulder muscles improve after rotator cuff repair in patients with massive rotator cuff tears? Adv Orthop 2012:195876PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 214:160–164PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chung SW, Kim JY, Kim MH, Kim SH, Oh JH (2013) Arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears: outcome and analysis of factors associated with healing failure or poor postoperative function. Am J Sports Med 41(7):1674–1683PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Coleman SH, Fealy S, Ehteshami JR, MacGillivray JD, Altchek DW, Warren RF, Turner AS (2003) Chronic rotator cuff injury and repair model in sheep. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(12):2391–2402PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Liu X, Manzano G, Kim HT, Feeley BT (2011) A rat model of massive rotator cuff tears. J Orthop Res 29(4):588–595PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gupta R, Lee TQ (2007) Contributions of the different rabbit models to our understanding of rotator cuff pathology. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16(5 Suppl):S149–S157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gerber C, Schneeberger AG, Hoppeler H, Meyer DC (2007) Correlation of atrophy and fatty infiltration on strength and integrity of rotator cuff repairs: a study in thirteen patients. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16(6):691–696PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lee E, Choi JA, Oh JH, Ahn S, Hong SH, Chai JW, Kang HS (2013) Fatty degeneration of the rotator cuff muscles on pre- and postoperative CT arthrography (CTA): is the Goutallier grading system reliable? Skeletal Radiol 42(9):1259–1267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bartl C, Kouloumentas P, Holzapfel K, Eichhorn S, Wörtler K, Imhoff A, Salzmann GM (2012) Long-term outcome and structural integrity following open repair of massive rotator cuff tears. Int J Shoulder Surg. 6(1):1–8PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sugaya H, Maeda K, Matsuki K, Moriishi J (2007) Repair integrity and functional outcome after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair. A prospective outcome study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(5):953–960PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rebuzzi E, Coletti N, Schiavetti S, Giusto F (2005) Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in patients older than 60 years. Arthroscopy 21(1):48–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gokmen Deniz
    • 1
  • Ozkan Kose
    • 2
  • Ali Tugay
    • 3
  • Ferhat Guler
    • 2
  • Adil Turan
    • 2
  1. 1.Batman Medical Park Hospital, Orthopedics and Traumatology ClinicBatmanTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Orthopedics and TraumatologyAntalya Education and Research HospitalAntalyaTurkey
  3. 3.Batman Medical Park Hospital, Radiology ClinicBatmanTurkey

Personalised recommendations