Advertisement

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

, Volume 134, Issue 7, pp 963–969 | Cite as

A comparison of the anteromedial and transtibial drilling technique in ACL reconstruction after a short-term follow-up

  • İbrahim Azboy
  • Abdullah Demirtaş
  • Mehmet Gem
  • Seymuz Kıran
  • Celil Alemdar
  • Mehmet Bulut
Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine

Abstract

Introduction

The purpose of this study was to compare clinical and radiological outcomes of patients who underwent single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with anteromedial portal (AMP) and transtibial (TT) techniques.

Materials and methods

Arthroscopic single-bundle ACL reconstruction was performed using AMP technique in 34 patients and TT technique in 30 patients. The patients were evaluated retrospectively. Aperture fixation was used for femoral fixation, and absorbable screws and U staples were used for tibial fixation of the graft. Pivot shift test, Lachman test, Lysholm, Tegner, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC-2000) scoring systems were used in the clinical and functional evaluation of patients before and after the surgery. Time to return sports and activity level were assessed. In the radiological evaluation of non-anatomic bone tunnel placement, the criteria developed by lllingworth et al. were used. The mean duration of follow-up was 20.4 and 24.6 months in the AMP and TT groups, respectively.

Results

There was a significant difference between the AMP group (86.7 %) and the TT (14.7 %) group in terms of anatomical placement of the femoral tunnels and grafts (p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of the Pivot shift test, Lachman test, Lysholm, Tegner, and IKDC scores, and activity level (p > 0.05). The patients in the AMP group returned to sports 1.5 months earlier on average (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

It was shown that AMP technique was superior to the TT technique in providing anatomical placement of the graft and in recovery time to return sports; however, there was no difference between groups in early periods in terms of the clinical and functional outcomes.

Keywords

Anatomical reconstruction Anterior cruciate ligament Anteromedial portal Transtibial technique Single bundle 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Authors thanks to Dr. Ebubekir Şenates for his contribution to this study.

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Musahl V, Plakseychuk A, Van Scyoc A, Sasaki T, Debski RE, McMahon PJ, Fu FH (2005) Varying femoral tunnels between the anatomical footprint and isometric positions: effect on kinematics of the anterior cruciate ligament-recostructed knee. Am J Sports Med 33:712–718PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Streich NA, Reichenbacher S, Barié A, Buchner M, Schmitt H (2013) Long-term outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with an autologous four-strand semitendinosus tendon autograft. Int Orthop 37:279–284PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kopf S, Forsythe B, Wong AK, Tashman S, Irrgang JJ, Fu FH (2012) Transtibial ACL reconstruction technique fails to position drill tunnels anatomically in vivo 3D CT study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(11):2200–2207PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Inderhaug E, Strand T, Fischer-Bredenbeck C, Solheim E (2013) Long-term results after reconstruction of the ACL with hamstrings autograft and transtibial femoral drilling. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(9):2004–2010PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Papannagari R, Gill PJ, Defrate LE, Moses JM, Petruska AJ, Li G (2006) In vivo kinematics of the knee after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a clinical and functional evaluation. Am J Sports Med 34:2006–2012PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang H, Fleischli JE, Zheng NN (2013) Transtibial versus anteromedial portal technique in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: outcomes of knee joint kinematics during walking. Am J Sports Med 41:1847–1856PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Marchant BG, Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD, Fleckenstein C (2010) Prevalence of nonanatomical graft placement in a series of failed anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Am J Sports Med 38:1987–1996PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Crawford SN, Waterman BR, Lubowitz JH (2013) Long term failure of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 29:1566–1571PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Abebe ES, Moorman CT 3rd, Dziedzic TS, Spritzer CE, Cothran RL, Taylor DC et al (2009) Femoral tunnel placement during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an in vivo imaging analysis comparing transtibial and 2-incision tibial tunnelindependent techniques. Am J Sports Med 37(10):1904–1911Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Noh JH, Roh YH, Yang BG, Yi SR, Lee SY (2013) Femoral tunnel position on conventional magnetic resonance imaging after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in young men: transtibial technique versus anteromedial portal technique. Arthroscopy 29:882–890PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kopf S, Forsythe B, Wong AK, Tashman S, Anderst W, Irrgang JJ, Fu FH (2010) Nonanatomic tunnel position in traditional transtibial single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction evaluated by three-dimensional computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:1427–1431PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bedi A, Maak T, Musahl V, Citak M, O’Loughlin PF, Choi D, Pearle AD (2011) Effect of tibial tunnel position on stability of the knee after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: is the tibial tunnel position most important? Am J Sports Med 39:366–373PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Steiner ME, Battaglia TC, Heming JF, Rand JD, Festa A, Baria M (2009) Independent drilling outperforms conventional transtibial drilling in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 37:1912–1919PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Takahashi M, Doi M, Abe M, Suzuki D, Nagano A (2006) Anatomical study of the femoral and tibial insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of human anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 34:787–792PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Franceschi F, Papalia R, Rizzello G, Del Buono A, Maffulli N, Denaro V (2013) Anteromedial portal versus transtibial drilling techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: any clinical relevance? A retrospective comparative study. Arthroscopy 29(8):1330–1337PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kim MK, Lee BC, Park JH (2011) Anatomic single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by the two anteromedial portal method: the comparison of transportal and transtibial techniques. Knee Surg Relat Res 23:213–219PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Morgan CD, Kalman VR, Grawl DM (1995) Definitive landmarks for reproducible tibial tunnel placement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 11:275–288PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cohen SB, Fu FH (2007) Three-portal technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: use of a central medial portal. Arthroscopy 23(3):325 (e1–5)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hefti F, Muller W, Jakob RP, Staubli HU (1993) Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1:226–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 198:43–49PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hefti F, Müller W (1993) Current state of evaluation of knee ligament lesions. The new IKDC knee evaluation form. Orthopade 22(6):351–362PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fitzgerald GK, Axe MJ, Snyder-Mackler L (2000) A decision-making scheme for returning patients to highlevel activity with nonoperative treatment after anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 8(2):76–82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Noyes FR, Barber SD, Mangine RE (1991) Abnormal lower limb symmetry determined by function hop tests after anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Am J Sports Med 19(5):513–518PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    lllingworth KD, Hensler D, Working ZM, Macalena JA, Tashman S, Fu FH (2011) A simple evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament femoral tunnel position: the inclination angle and femoral tunnel angle. Am J Sports Med 39:2611–2618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Alentron-Geli E, Samitier G, Alvarez P, Cugat R (2010) Anteromedial portal versus transtibial drilling techniques in ACL reconstruction: a blinded cross-sectional study at two-to five-year follow-up. Int Orthop 34:747–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Koutras G, Papadopoulos P, Terzidis IP, Gigis I, Pappas E (2013) Short term functional and clinical outcomes after ACL reconstruction with hamstring autograft: transtibial versus anteromedial portal technique. Knee Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:1904–1909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Johnson DL, Swenson TM, Irrgang JJ, Fu FH, Harner CD (1996) Revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery: experience from Pittsburgh. Clin Orthop Relat Res 325:100–109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fuu FH, Bennett CH, Ma CB, Menetrey J, Lattermann C (2000) Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part II operative procedures and clinical correlations. Am J Sports Med 28:124–130Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhang C, Xu H, Li X, Wang Y, Zhang Q, Zhu Q (2013) Oblique femoral tunnel or oblique graft? A modified anteromedial portal technique to obtain vertical femoral tunnel and oblique graft in anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 23:731–735PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Silva A, Sampaio R, Pinto E (2012) ACL reconstruction: comparison between transtibial and anteromedial portal techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:896–903PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Otani M, Nozaki M, Kobayashi M, Goto H, Tawada K, Waguri-Nagaya Y et al (2012) Comparative risk of common peroneal nerve injury in far anteromedial portal drilling and transtibial drilling in anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:896–903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Riboh JC, Hasselblad V, Godin JA, Mather RC 3rd (2013) Transtibial versus independent drilling techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Am J Sports Med 41(11):2693–2702PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Duffee A, Magnussen RA, Pedroza AD, Flanigan DC, Kaeding CC, MOON Group (2013) Transtibial ACL femoral tunnel preparation increases odds of repeat ipsilateral knee surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 20(95):2035–2042CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • İbrahim Azboy
    • 1
  • Abdullah Demirtaş
    • 1
  • Mehmet Gem
    • 1
  • Seymuz Kıran
    • 1
  • Celil Alemdar
    • 1
  • Mehmet Bulut
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedics and TraumatologyDicle University Medical FacultyDiyarbakırTurkey

Personalised recommendations