Advertisement

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

, Volume 134, Issue 7, pp 913–918 | Cite as

Safety screw fixation technique in a case of coracoid base fracture with acromioclavicular dislocation and coracoid base cross-sectional size data from a computed axial tomography study

  • Yoshiteru Kawasaki
  • Tetsuya Hirano
  • Katsutoshi Miyatake
  • Koji Fujii
  • Yoshitsugu Takeda
Orthopaedic Surgery

Abstract

Coracoid base fracture accompanied by acromioclavicular joint dislocation with intact coracoclavicular ligaments is a rare injury. Generally, an open reduction with screw fixation is the first treatment choice, as it protects the important structures around the coracoid process. This report presents a new technique of screw fixation for coracoid base fracture and provides anatomic information on cross-sectional size of the coracoid base obtained by computed tomography (CT). An axial image of the coracoid base was visualized over the neck of the scapula, and a guidewire was inserted into this circle under fluoroscopic guidance. The wire was inserted easily into the neck of scapula across the coracoid base fracture with imaging in only 1 plane. In addition, 25 measurements of the coracoid base were made in 25 subjects on axial CT images. Average length of the long and short axes at the thinnest part of the coracoid base was 13.9 ± 2.0 mm (range 10.6–17.0) and 10.5 ± 2.2 mm (6.6–15.1), respectively. This new screw fixation technique and measurement data on the coracoid base may be beneficial for safety screw fixation of coracoid base fracture.

Keywords

Acromioclavicular joint dislocation Fracture of the coracoid base Screw fixation 

Notes

Conflict of interest

None of the authors have any conflicts of interest or disclosures in relation this report.

References

  1. 1.
    Lasda NA, Murray DG (1978) Fracture separation of the coracoids process associated with acromioclavicular dislocation: conservative treatment—a case report and review of the literature. Clin Orthop Relat Res 134:222–224PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carr AJ, Broughton NS (1989) Acromioclavicular dislocation associated with fracture of the coracoid process. J Trauma 29:125–126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wilber MC, Evans EB (1977) Fractures of the scapula. An analysis of forty cases and a review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 59:358–362Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Montgomery SP, Loyd RD (1977) Avulsion fracture of the coracoids epiphysis with acromioclavicular separation. Report of two cases in adolescents and review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 59:963–965Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Martín-Herrero T, Rodríguez-Merchán C, Munuera-Martínez L (1990) Fractures of the coracoid process: presentation of seven cases and review of the literature. J Trauma 30(12):1597–1599PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bhatia DN, Dasgupta B, Rao N (2013) Orthogonal radiographic technique for radiographic visualization of coracoid process fractures and pericoracoid fracture extensions. J Orthop Trauma. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182604688 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bernard TN Jr, Brunet ME, Haddad RJ Jr (1983) Fractured coracoids process in acromioclavicular dislocations. Report of four cases and review of the literature. Clin Orthop Relat Res 175:227–232PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eyres KS, Brooks A, Stanley D (1995) Fractures of the coracoid process. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77(3):425–428PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chitre AR, Divecha HM, Hakimi M, Marynissen HA (2012) Traumatic isolated coracoid fractures in the adolescent. Case Rep Orthop. doi: 10.1155/2012/371627 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Güleç A, Kütahya H, Göncü RG, Toker S (2014) Isolated fracture of the coracoid process. Case Rep Orthop. doi: 10.1155/2014/482130 Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ogawa K, Yoshida A, Takahashi M, Ui M (1997) Fractures of the coracoid process. Bone Joint Surg Br 79(1):17–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ogawa K, Matsumura N, Ikegami H (2012) Coracoid fractures: therapeutic strategy and surgical outcomes. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 72(2):E20–E26PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Duan X, Zhang H, Zhang H, Wang Z (2010) Treatment of coracoid process fractures associated with acromioclavicular dislocation using clavicular hook plate and coracoid screws. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19:e22–e25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kim KC, Rhee KJ, Shin HD, Kim DK, Shin HS (2009) Displaced fracture of the coracoid process associated with acromioclavicular dislocation: a two-bird-one-stone solution. J Trauma 67(2):403–405PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bhatia DN (2012) Orthogonal biplanar fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous fixation of a coracoid base fracture associated with acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 16:56–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bhatia DN, de Beer JF, du Toit DF (2007) Coracoid process anatomy: implications in radiographic imaging and surgery. Clin Anat 20(7):774–784PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    von Schroeder HP, Kuiper SD, Botte MJ (2001) Osseous anatomy of the scapula. Clin Orthop Relat Res 383:131–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Eschler A, Gradl G, Gierer P, Mittlmeier T, Beck M (2012) Hook plate fixation for acromioclavicular joint separations restores coracoclavicular distance more accurately than PDS augmentation, however presents with a high rate of acromial osteolysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132:33–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yoshiteru Kawasaki
    • 1
  • Tetsuya Hirano
    • 1
  • Katsutoshi Miyatake
    • 1
  • Koji Fujii
    • 1
  • Yoshitsugu Takeda
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of OrthopedicsTokushima Red Cross HospitalKomatsushimaJapan

Personalised recommendations