Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

, Volume 133, Issue 11, pp 1509–1516 | Cite as

Modified direct anterior approach in minimally invasive hip hemiarthroplasty in a geriatric population: a feasibility study and description of the technique

  • A. C. Unger
  • A. P. Schulz
  • A. Paech
  • Ch. Jürgens
  • F. G. Renken
Trauma Surgery

Abstract

Introduction

The direct anterior approach (DAA) is generally accepted method for minimal invasive arthroplasty of the hip. As good results for total hip arthroplasty are already published, there is a lack of evidence for the implantation of bipolar hip hemiarthroplasty (BHH) in elderly patients with osteoporosis after femoral neck fracture.

Materials and methods

For hip arthroplasty using a direct anterior approach (DAA) in elderly patients with femoral neck fractures, a number of modifications of the original technique are being described. The modified DAA considers in particular the co-morbidity and the bone quality of the geriatric patient population. A consecutive series of 16 hemiarthroplasties using this technique is presented. In all 16 cases, the BHH was implanted in modified DAA technique. Mobility measured by 4-item Barthel Index, pain via visual analogue scale (VAS), duration of surgery, external length of incision and blood loss were evaluated.

Results

There was no major operative complication during the procedures. The pain level decreased from 7 (preoperatively) to 0 at postoperative day 40. The Barthel Index increased from 5 at first postoperative day to 40 at day 40. Early postoperative mobilisation is efficiently accelerated. Mean operating time was 71 min; the medium skin incision length was 8 cm. The mean haemoglobin level decreased from 118 g/dl preoperatively to 101 g/dl at first postoperative day.

Conclusion

The described modifications of the DAA help to implant a BHH gently in elderly patients with increasing risk of complications like iatrogenic fractures, wound or prosthesis infections and haematoma. This will hopefully lead to a faster rehabilitation and lower mortality rate for patients with femoral neck fractures in the future.

Keywords

Bipolar hip hemiarthroplasty Femoral neck fracture Minimal invasive Direct anterior approach Rehabilitation Geriatric 

References

  1. 1.
    Frerichmann U, Raschke MJ, Stockle U, Wohrmann S, Lohmann R (2007) Proximal femoral fractures in the elderly. Data from health insurance providers on more than 23 million insured persons–part 2. Unfallchirurg 110(7):610–616. doi:10.1007/s00113-007-1258-y PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Richmond J, Aharonoff GB, Zuckerman JD, Koval KJ (2003) Mortality risk after hip fracture. J Orthop Trauma 17(1):53–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lohmann R, Frerichmann U, Stockle U, Riegel T, Raschke MJ (2007) Proximal femoral fractures in the elderly. Analysis of data from health insurance providers on more than 23 million insured persons–part 1. Unfallchirurg 110(7):603–609. doi:10.1007/s00113-007-1257-z PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clayer MT, Bauze RJ (1989) Morbidity and mortality following fractures of the femoral neck and trochanteric region: analysis of risk factors. J Trauma 29(12):1673–1678PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Magaziner J, Lydick E, Hawkes W, Fox KM, Zimmerman SI, Epstein RS, Hebel JR (1997) Excess mortality attributable to hip fracture in white women aged 70 years and older. Am J Public Health 87(10):1630–1636PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pientka L (2004) Hip fractures (osteoporosis) and geriatric rehabilitation. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 47(6):547–553. doi:10.1007/s00103-004-0839-y PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Su H, Aharonoff GB, Hiebert R, Zuckerman JD, Koval KJ (2003) In-hospital mortality after femoral neck fracture: do internal fixation and hemiarthroplasty differ? Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 32(3):151–155Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rachbauer F (2005) Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty via direct anterior approach. Orthopade 34(11):1103–1104. doi:10.1007/s00132-005-0854-1 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Berger R (2004) Direct anterior approach. In: Hozak WJKM, Nogler M et al (eds) Minimally invase total joint arthroplasty. Springer, Berlin, pp 108–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Di Monaco M, Di Monaco R, Manca M, Cavanna A (2002) Functional recovery and length of stay after recurrent hip fracture. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 81(2):86–89PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Diamond TH, Thornley SW, Sekel R, Smerdely P (1997) Hip fracture in elderly men: prognostic factors and outcomes. Med J Aust 167(8):412–415PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Figved W, Opland V, Frihagen F, Jervidalo T, Madsen JE, Nordsletten L (2009) Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(9):2426–2435. doi:10.1007/s11999-008-0672-y PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Simanski C, Bouillon B, Lefering R, Zumsande N, Tiling T (2002) What prognostic factors correlate with activities of daily living (Barthel Index) 1 year after para-articular hip fracture? A prospective observational study. Unfallchirurg 105(2):99–107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Van Balen R, Essink-Bot ML, Steyerberg E, Cools H, Habbema DF (2003) Quality of life after hip fracture: a comparison of four health status measures in 208 patients. Disabil Rehabil 25(10):507–519. doi:10.1080/0963828031000090443 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hobart JC, Thompson AJ (2001) The five item Barthel index. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 71(2):225–230PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    DiGioia AM 3rd, Plakseychuk AY, Levison TJ, Jaramaz B (2003) Mini-incision technique for total hip arthroplasty with navigation. J Arthroplasty 18(2):123–128. doi:10.1054/arth.2003.50025 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wenz JF, Gurkan I, Jibodh SR (2002) Mini-incision total hip arthroplasty: a comparative assessment of perioperative outcomes. Orthopedics 25(10):1031–1043PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bertin KC, Rottinger H (2004) Anterolateral mini-incision hip replacement surgery: a modified Watson–Jones approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 429:248–255 00003086-200412000-00038PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Berry DJ, Berger RA, Callaghan JJ, Dorr LD, Duwelius PJ, Hartzband MA, Lieberman JR, Mears DC (2003) Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Development, early results, and a critical analysis. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Orthopaedic Association, Charleston, South Carolina, USA, June 14, 2003. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(11):2235–2246PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Light TR, Keggi KJ (1980) Anterior approach to hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 152:255–260PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kennon RE, Keggi MJ, Keggi KJ (2006) The minimally invasive anterior approach to hip arthroplasty. Orthopade 35(7):731–737. doi:10.1007/s00132-006-0965-3 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rittmeister M, Peters A (2005) A posterior mini-incision for total hip arthroplasty—results of 76 consecutive cases. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 143(4):403–411. doi:10.1055/s-2005-836831 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Higuchi F, Gotoh M, Yamaguchi N, Suzuki R, Kunou Y, Ooishi K, Nagata K (2003) Minimally invasive uncemented total hip arthroplasty through an anterolateral approach with a shorter skin incision. J Orthop Sci 8(6):812–817. doi:10.1007/s00776-003-0715-x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Berger RA (2003) Total hip arthroplasty using the minimally invasive two-incision approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 417:232–241. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000096828.67494.95 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sculco TP (2004) Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: in the affirmative. J Arthroplasty 19(4 Suppl 1):78–80 pii: S0883540304001391PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Berger RA, Jacobs JJ, Meneghini RM, Della Valle C, Paprosky W, Rosenberg AG (2004) Rapid rehabilitation and recovery with minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 429:239–247 pii:00003086-200412000-00037PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Murphy SB, Tannast M (2006) Conventional vs minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. A prospective study of rehabilitation and complications. Orthopade 35(7):761–764. doi:10.1007/s00132-006-0969-z PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rachbauer F, Krismer M (2008) Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty via direct anterior approach. Oper Orthop Traumatol 20(3):239–251. doi:10.1007/s00064-008-1306-y PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Garcia-Alvarez F, Al-Ghanem R, Garcia-Alvarez I, Lopez-Baisson A, Bernal M (2010) Risk factors for postoperative infections in patients with hip fracture treated by means of Thompson arthroplasty. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 50(1):51–55. doi:10.1016/j.archger.2009.01.009 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Koulouvaris P, Sculco P, Finerty E, Sculco T, Sharrock NE (2009) Relationship between perioperative urinary tract infection and deep infection after joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(7):1859–1867. doi:10.1007/s11999-008-0614-8 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    David TS, Vrahas MS (2000) Perioperative lower urinary tract infections and deep sepsis in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 8(1):66–74PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kamel HK (2005) The frequency and factors linked to a urinary tract infection coding in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. J Am Med Dir Assoc 6(5):316–320. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2005.04.005 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Cheng T, Feng JG, Liu T, Zhang XL (2009) Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. Int Orthop 33(6):1473–1481. doi:10.1007/s00264-009-0743-z PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mahmood A, Zafar MS, Majid I, Maffulli N, Thompson J (2007) Minimally invasive hip arthroplasty: a quantitative review of the literature. Br Med Bull 84:37–48. doi:10.1093/bmb/ldm029 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Jerosch J, Theising C, Fadel ME (2006) Antero-lateral minimal invasive (ALMI) approach for total hip arthroplasty technique and early results. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 126(3):164–173. doi:10.1007/s00402-006-0113-x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sculco TP, Jordan LC (2004) The mini-incision approach to total hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 53:141–147PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sculco TP, Jordan LC, Walter WL (2004) Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: the Hospital for Special Surgery experience. Orthop Clin North Am 35(2):137–142. doi:10.1016/S0030-5898(03)00116-0 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Dorr LD (2004) The mini-incision hip: building a ship in a bottle. Orthopedics 27(2):192PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hutchings L, Fox R, Chesser T (2011) Proximal femoral fractures in the elderly: how are we measuring outcome? Injury 42(11):1205–1213PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. C. Unger
    • 1
  • A. P. Schulz
    • 1
    • 2
  • A. Paech
    • 1
  • Ch. Jürgens
    • 1
    • 2
  • F. G. Renken
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Trauma and OrthopaedicsUniversity Hospital Schleswig–HolsteinLübeckGermany
  2. 2.Department of Trauma and OrthopaedicsBG-Trauma Hospital HamburgHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations