Co-morbidities in elderly patients with hip fracture: recommendations of the ISFR-IOF hip fracture outcomes working group
Hip fractures are the second leading cause of hospitalization in the aged and by 2041, epidemiologists forecast an increase in economic cost to $2.4 billion. The hip patient population often presents with comorbidities causing these patients to receive less aggressive medical treatment and have a low quality of life. We believe that physical function is a patient-important outcome for many medical and surgical interventions. The functional co-morbidity index (FCI), unlike prior co-morbidity indices, was developed with physical function as an outcome instead of being designed for administrative purposes or to predict mortality. Our objective was to evaluate the perceptions of practitioners in hip fracture care about the impact of comorbidities on physical function as primary outcome.
We piloted and then distributed a self-administered survey to members of the International Society for Fracture Repair hip fracture outcomes working group. For each of the 18 diagnoses included in the FCI index, we asked in our survey whether the presence of the co-morbidity and whether the severity of the co-morbidity was perceived to impact physical function in patients following a hip fracture.
Seventeen out of 20 respondents completed the questionnaire. The presence and severity of arthritis was ‘strongly’ believed to predict physical function in those with hip fracture (69 and 85.7 %, respectively). Respondents ‘agreed’ (range 53–73 %) that 10/18 diagnoses would predict changes in physical function following hip fracture treatment. Whereas, 63 % of the practitioners‘strongly disagreed’ that diabetes types I and II would change physical function scores. Furthermore, dementia was listed as an additional diagnosis that would affect physical function.
The FCI may provide a useful instrument to predict functional outcome after hip fracture; however, the index may need to be modified for this specific population.
KeywordsCo-morbidity Hip fracture Elderly Survey Osteoporosis
- 1.Canadian Study of Health and Aging Working Group (1994) Canadian Study of Health and Aging: study methods and prevalence of dementia. CMAJ 150:899–913Google Scholar
- 4.Desai MM, Bogardus ST, Williams CS et al (2002) Development and validation of a risk-adjustment index for older patients: the high-risk diagnoses for the elderly scale. J Am Geriatr Soc 50:478–481Google Scholar
- 9.Goldhahn S, Hoang-Kim A, Nakamura N, Goldhahn J (2011) Outcome measures in multicenter studies in a practical guide to research: design, execution and publication. Lubowitz J, Karlsson J, Marx R, Poehling G, Bhandari M (eds) Publication by the international society of arthroscopy, knee surgery, and orthopaedic sports medicine (ISAKOS). Arthroscopy 27(4 Suppl):S83–S93Google Scholar
- 15.Hilligsmann M, Kanis JA, Compston J et al (2013) Health technology assessment in osteoporosis. Calcified Tissue Int 1–14. doi:10.1007/s00223-013-9724-8
- 16.Hoang-Kim A (2010) The first international society for fracture repair and international osteoporosis foundation “osteoporosis: from evidence to action” combined symposium & working groups. Adv Orthop 2(1):15–18Google Scholar
- 26.McNeill JM (1997) Americans with disabilities 1994–1995. Series P70-61, US Department of Commerce, Bureau of the CensusGoogle Scholar
- 37.Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosiniski M et al (1993) SF-36 health survey: manual and interpretation guide. Health Institute, BostonGoogle Scholar