The use of a structural free iliac crest autograft for the treatment of acetabular fractures
Bone and cartilage deficits in the posterior acetabular wall are severe complications resulting from the unsuccessful management or delayed treatment of acetabular fracture. This potentially disastrous condition cannot be treated reliably with the use of reconstruction plates and screws alone. Therefore, this technical report describes a modified anatomical reconstruction method that uses a structural iliac crest autograft and an acetabular tridimensional memory alloy fixation system (ATMFS) to treat late-stage deficits in the posterior wall of the acetabulum. This paper also describes a clinical study of 22 patients with an average of 6.3 years follow-up to evaluate the clinical outcomes of this method.
Twenty-two patients, who had an acetabular reconstruction between January 2000 and December 2011 that used a structured free iliac crest autograft to treat late-stage bone and cartilage deficits in the posterior acetabular wall were followed annually with clinical and radiographic evaluations. The average age of the patients was 36.4 years at the time of the procedure, and the average time of follow-up was 6.3 years.
None of the patients in this study lost reduction after surgery, and there were no cases of implant failure. Radiographic analysis using Matta’s X-ray evaluation criteria were excellent in eleven cases, good in eight, and fair on three. The Merle D’Aubigné and Postel clinical outcomes at the final follow-up were as follows: seven cases were excellent, ten cases were good, three cases were fair and two cases were poor.
The use of a modified iliac crest grafting and ATMFS fixation, as a biological method to reconstruct the acetabulum anatomically may offer better congruence of the joint surface and may ensure good hip joint stability during early postoperative exercise. The medium to long-term results of this method are encouraging.
KeywordsStructural free iliac crest Autograft Acetabular fracture Acetabular three-dimensional memory fixation system
Conflict of interest
The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their research for or preparation of this manuscript.
- 2.Moed BR, Carr SE, Gruson KI et al (2003) Computed tomographic assessment of fracture of posterior wall of the acetabulum after operative treatment. J Bone Jt Surg Am 85-A:512–522Google Scholar
- 3.Moed BR, Carr SE, Watson JT (2002) Results of operative treatment of fracture of the posterior wall of the acetabulum. J Bone Jt Surg Am 84-A:752–758Google Scholar
- 4.Matta JM (1996) Fractures of the acetabulum: accuracy of reduction and clinical results in patients managed operatively within 3 weeks after the injury. J Bone Jt Surg Am 78(11):1632–1645Google Scholar
- 8.Zhang CC, Xu SG, Wang JL et al (2002) Design and clinical applications of acetabular tridimensional memory alloy-fixation system. Chin J Orthop 22(2):709–713Google Scholar
- 9.Baumgartner MR (1999) Fractures of the posterior wall of the acetabulum. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 7:54–65Google Scholar
- 11.Zha GC, Sun JY, Chen L et al (2012) Late reconstruction of posterior acetabular wall fractures using iliac crest. J Trauma 72:1386–1392Google Scholar
- 12.Olson SA, Bay RK, Chapman MW et al (1995) Biomechanical consequences of fracture and repair of the posterior wall of the acetabulum. J Bone Jt Surg Am 77(8):1184–1192Google Scholar