Multiple drilling compared with standard core decompression for avascular necrosis of the femoral head in sickle cell disease patients
- 647 Downloads
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is the most common cause of avascular necrosis of femoral head (ANFH) in childhood. Advances in medical treatment led to improved life expectancy of such patients. SCD-related ANFH frequently progress to total collapse of the femoral head necessitating hip replacement. However, SCD patient are at more risk of intra- and post-operative complications and suboptimal outcome of total hip arthroplasty. Hence, it is imperative to preserve the femoral head as long as possible.
Patients and methods
Between September 1992 and June 2007, 94 core decompression procedures were done to SCD patients who had modified Ficat stage I, IIA and IIB ANFH. Sixty one patients underwent a classical 8-mm drilling and 33 patients underwent 3.2-mm diameter MD technique. Patients were followed up for minimum of 2 years and were evaluated for clinical and Harris Hip Score improvement and for radiological progression.
All 19 hips that had Ficat stage I had significant reduction of pain and improvement of Harris Hip Score. No patient has required further surgery. Among the 39 hips with Ficat IIA at time of procedure, 80 % of hips which underwent CD and 78 % of MD cases had significant reduction of pain and improvement of HHS. Those patients showed no radiographic progression of the disease. The remaining, 20 % CD and 22 % MD eventually progressed radiologically to grade III or grade IV and had HHS less than 75 at last visit. In the 36 cases with Ficat IIB, 52 % CD and 52.8 % MC had significant reduction of pain and improvement of HHS. The rest showed no improvement in pain and function, and progressed to stage IV; 11 of them underwent THA and one patient refused surgery.
While multiple drilling is safer and less invasive than single coring in SCD, there is no statistically significant difference in outcome or complication rate between both procedures done for ANFH in patients with SCD.
KeywordsCore decompression Multiple drilling Avascular necrosis Sickle cell disease
I would like to thank Dr. Adel Yusuf (Biostatician) who helped me a lot in statistical analysis of the results.
- 2.Hernigou P, Galacteros F, Bachir D, Goutallier D (1991) Deformities of the hip in adults who have sickle-cell disease and had avascular necrosis in childhood. A natural history of fifty-two patients. J Bone Jt Surg Am 73(1):81–92Google Scholar
- 3.Cheng EY, Thongtrangan I, Laorr A, Saleh KJ (2004) Spontaneous resolution of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Jt Surg Am 86-A(12):2594–2599Google Scholar
- 9.Clarke HJ, Jinnah RH, Brooker AF, Michaelson JD (1989) Total replacement of the hip for avascular necrosis in sickle cell disease. J Bone Jt Surg Br 71(3):465–470Google Scholar
- 13.Mont MA, Ragland PS, Etienne G (2004) Core decompression of the femoral head for osteonecrosis using percutaneous multiple small-diameter drilling. Clin Orthop Relat Res (429):131–138Google Scholar
- 15.Smith SW, Fehring TK, Griffin WL, Beaver WB (1995) Core decompression of the osteonecrotic femoral head. J Bone Jt Surg Am 77(5):674–680Google Scholar
- 18.Mont MA, Carbone JJ, Fairbank AC (1996) Core decompression versus nonoperative management for osteonecrosis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res (324):169–178Google Scholar
- 19.Stulberg BN, Davis AW, Bauer TW, Levine M, Easley K (1991) Osteonecrosis of the femoral head. A prospective randomized treatment protocol. Clin Orthop Relat Res (268):140–151Google Scholar
- 20.Floerkemeier T, Lutz A, Nackenhorst U, Thorey F, Waizy H, Windhagen H, von Lewinski G (2011) Core decompression and osteonecrosis intervention rod in osteonecrosis of the femoral head: clinical outcome and finite element analysis. Int Orthop 35(10):1461–1466. doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-1138-x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Shimizu K, Moriya H, Akita T, Sakamoto M, Suguro T (1994) Prediction of collapse with magnetic resonance imaging of avascular necrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Jt Surg Am 76(2):215–223Google Scholar
- 23.Steinberg ME, Bands RE, Parry S, Hoffman E, Chan T, Hartman KM (1999) Does lesion size affect the outcome in avascular necrosis? Clin Orthop Relat Res (367):262–271Google Scholar