Advertisement

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

, Volume 132, Issue 9, pp 1241–1250 | Cite as

Surgical treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the talus: a systematic review

  • Jörn ZwingmannEmail author
  • Norbert P. Südkamp
  • Hagen Schmal
  • Philipp Niemeyer
Orthopaedic Surgery

Abstract

Purpose

Osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) is an aseptic bone necrosis and represents pathology of high clinical relevance, which is frequently located on the talus. Various treatment strategies including non-surgical and surgical approaches have been described. An evidence-based treatment algorithm is still lacking. The present systematic review focuses on surgical treatment options and their stage-dependent outcome described for treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the talus with special regard to the best available evidence.

Methods

For this purpose, an OVID-based systematic literature search was performed including the following databases; MEDLINE, MEDLINE preprints, EMBASE, CINAHL, Life Science Citations, British National Library of Health and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials (CENTRAL). Literature search period was from January 1967 up to December 2009. After applying study specific inclusion criteria (minimum follow-up 12 months, patient evaluation by standardized scoring systems, etc.), a total of 54 studies with clinical follow-up of 1,105 patients was included. Methodology of these studies was systematically analyzed by the means of the Coleman Methodology Score. Outcome and success rate was evaluated in dependence of surgical treatment applied and in dependence of the stage of disease.

Results

All 54 studies included were classified as evidence level IV representing case series. The average Coleman Methodology Score was 63 (SD ± 17) points. The average follow-up of the 1,105 patients was 47 months (SD ± 17) with a mean age of 29 (SD ± 5.6) years. The proportion of excellent and good treatment results was stage-independent in total 75 %. According to the criteria of the score applied for patient’s evaluation in the individual study, the overall percentage of “good” and “excellent” clinical outcome in 869 patients was 79 %, and according the classification of Berndt and Harty, 82 % in stage I, 86 % in stage II, 83 % in stage III and 76 % in stage IV.

Conclusions

Although OCD of the talus represents a frequently observed orthopedic pathology, evidence concerning operative treatment of osteochondrosis dissecans of the talus is still elusive. With over 1,100 included patients in the present study, no strong recommendations based upon scientific evidence can be given.

Keywords

Osteochondritis dissecans Osteochondral defect Osteochondral lesion Talus Aseptic necrosis Treatment 

References

  1. 1.
    Green WT, Banks HH (1953) Osteochondritis dissecans in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 35-A (1):26–47 (passim)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pappas AM (1981) Osteochondrosis dissecans. Clin Orthop Relat Res 158:59–69PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Campbell CJ, Ranawat CS (1966) Osteochondritis dissecans: the question of etiology. J Trauma 6(2):201–221PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bruns JBP (1998) Osteochondrosis dissecans. Arthroskopie 11(1998):166–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bauer RS, Ochsner PE (1987) Nosology of osteochondrosis dissecans of the trochlea of the talus. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 125(2):194–200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Flick AB, Gould N (1985) Osteochondritis dissecans of the talus (transchondral fractures of the talus): review of the literature and new surgical approach for medial dome lesions. Foot Ankle 5(4):165–185PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Canale ST, Belding RH (1980) Osteochondral lesions of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 62(1):97–102PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Alexander AH, Lichtman DM (1980) Surgical treatment of transchondral talar-dome fractures (osteochondritis dissecans). Long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 62(4):646–652PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Berndt AL, Harty M (1959) Transchondral fractures (osteochondritis dissecans) of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 41-A:988–1020Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bruns J (1993) Osteochondrosis dissecans tali. Results of surgical therapy. Unfallchirurg 96(2):75–81PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Naumetz VA, Schweigel JF (1980) Osteocartilagenous lesions of the talar dome. J Trauma 20(11):924–927PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zollinger H, Dexel M (1981) Etiology of the osteochondrosis dissecans of the talus (author’s transl). Der Orthopade 10(1):92–94PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Noguchi K (1985) Biomechanical analysis for osteoarthritis of the ankle. Nippon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi 59(2):215–222PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rieck B, Paar O, Bernett P (1984) Intra-articular pressure measurement. A new method for the use of the pressure measuring film “Prescale”. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 122(6):841–842PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ramsey PL, Hamilton W (1976) Changes in tibiotalar area of contact caused by lateral talar shift. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58(3):356–357PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bauer R (1968) Osteochondrosis dissecans of the hip joint and its etiology. Arch Orthop Unfallchir 64(1):14–30PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hanzlik S, Mahabir RC, Baynosa RC, Khiabani KT (2009) Levels of evidence in research published in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume) over the last thirty years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(2):425–428PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Coleman BD, Khan KM, Maffulli N, Cook JL, Wark JD (2000) Studies of surgical outcome after patellar tendinopathy: clinical significance of methodological deficiencies and guidelines for future studies. Victorian Institute of Sport Tendon Study Group. Scand J Med Sci Sports 10(1):2–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jakobsen RB, Engebretsen L, Slauterbeck JR (2005) An analysis of the quality of cartilage repair studies. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(10):2232–2239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mithoefer K, McAdams T, Williams RJ, Kreuz PC, Mandelbaum BR (2009) Clinical efficacy of the microfracture technique for articular cartilage repair in the knee: an evidence-based systematic analysis. Am J Sports Med 37(10):2053–2063PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS, Sanders M (1994) Clinical rating systems for the ankle–hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int 15(7):349–353PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hangody L, Kish G, Karpati Z, Szerb I, Eberhardt R (1997) Treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the talus: use of the mosaicplasty technique—a preliminary report. Foot Ankle Int 18(10):628–634PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ogilvie-Harris DJ, Mahomed N, Demaziere A (1993) Anterior impingement of the ankle treated by arthroscopic removal of bony spurs. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75(3):437–440PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lahm A, Erggelet C, Steinwachs M, Reichelt A (2000) Arthroscopic management of osteochondral lesions of the talus: results of drilling and usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging before and after treatment. Arthroscopy 16(3):299–304PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Finsen V, Saetermo R, Kibsgaard L, Farran K, Engebretsen L, Bolz KD, Benum P (1989) Early postoperative weight-bearing and muscle activity in patients who have a fracture of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71(1):23–27PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hunsaker FG, Cioffi DA, Amadio PC, Wright JG, Caughlin B (2002) The American academy of orthopaedic surgeons outcomes instruments: normative values from the general population. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A (2):208–215Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Martin DF, Baker CL, Curl WW, Andrews JR, Robie DB, Haas AF (1989) Operative ankle arthroscopy. Long-term followup. AM J Sports Med 17 (1):16–23 (discussion 23)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Williams GN, Gangel TJ, Arciero RA, Uhorchak JM, Taylor DC (1999) Comparison of the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation method and two shoulder rating scales. Outcomes measures after shoulder surgery. Am J Sports Med 27(2):214–221PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Loomer R, Fisher C, Lloyd-Smith R, Sisler J, Cooney T (1993) Osteochondral lesions of the talus. Am J Sports Med 21(1):13–19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kolker D, Murray M, Wilson M (2004) Osteochondral defects of the talus treated with autologous bone grafting. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86(4):521–526PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Thermann H, Becher C (2004) Microfracture technique for treatment of osteochondral and degenerative chondral lesions of the talus. 2-year results of a prospective study. Unfallchirurg 107(1):27–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Koulalis D, Schultz W, Heyden M (2002) Autologous chondrocyte transplantation for osteochondritis dissecans of the talus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 395:186–192PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hangody L, Kish G, Modis L, Szerb I, Gaspar L, Dioszegi Z, Kendik Z (2001) Mosaicplasty for the treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the talus: two to seven year results in 36 patients. Foot Ankle Int 22(7):552–558PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Giannini S, Buda R, Vannini F, Di Caprio F, Grigolo B (2008) Arthroscopic autologous chondrocyte implantation in osteochondral lesions of the talus: surgical technique and results. Am J Sports Med 36(5):873–880PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Giannini S, Battaglia M, Buda R, Cavallo M, Ruffilli A, Vannini F (2009) Surgical treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus by open-field autologous chondrocyte implantation: a 10-year follow-up clinical and magnetic resonance imaging T2-mapping evaluation. Am J Sports Med 37(Suppl 1):112S–118SPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Haasper C, Zelle BA, Knobloch K, Jagodzinski M, Citak M, Lotz J, Krettek C, Zeichen J (2008) No mid-term difference in mosaicplasty in previously treated versus previously untreated patients with osteochondral lesions of the talus. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128(5):499–504PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kumai T, Takakura Y, Kitada C, Tanaka Y, Hayashi K (2002) Fixation of osteochondral lesions of the talus using cortical bone pegs. J Bone Joint Surg British 84(3):369–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Fritz J, Janssen P, Gaissmaier C, Schewe B, Weise K (2008) Articular cartilage defects in the knee–basics, therapies and results. Injury 39(Suppl 1):S50–S57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Nakamura N, Miyama T, Engebretsen L, Yoshikawa H, Shino K (2009) Cell-based therapy in articular cartilage lesions of the knee. Arthroscopy 25(5):531–552PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Vasiliadis HS, Wasiak J, Salanti G (2010) Autologous chondrocyte implantation for the treatment of cartilage lesions of the knee: a systematic review of randomized studies. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(12):1645–1655PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bentley G, Biant LC, Carrington RW, Akmal M, Goldberg A, Williams AM, Skinner JA, Pringle J (2003) A prospective, randomised comparison of autologous chondrocyte implantation versus mosaicplasty for osteochondral defects in the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85(2):223–230PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Gudas R, Kalesinskas RJ, Kimtys V, Stankevicius E, Toliusis V, Bernotavicius G, Smailys A (2005) A prospective randomized clinical study of mosaic osteochondral autologous transplantation versus microfracture for the treatment of osteochondral defects in the knee joint in young athletes. Arthroscopy 21(9):1066–1075PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Loveday D, Clifton R, Robinson A (2010) Interventions for treating osteochondral defects of the talus in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8:CD008104. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008104.pub2
  44. 44.
    Niemeyer P, Salzmann G, Schmal H, Mayr H, Sudkamp NP (2011) Autologous chondrocyte implantation for the treatment of chondral and osteochondral defects of the talus: a meta-analysis of available evidence. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol ArthroscGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Zengerink M, Struijs PA, Tol JL, van Dijk CN (2010) Treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(2):238–246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kreuz PC, Lahm A, Haag M, Kostler W, Konrad G, Zwingmann J, Hauschild O, Niemeyer P, Steinwachs M (2008) Tibial wedge osteotomy for osteochondral transplantation in talar lesions. Int J Sports Med 29(7):584–589PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Seil R, Rupp S, Pape D, Dienst M, Kohn D (2001) Approach to open treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus. Der Orthopade 30(1):47–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jörn Zwingmann
    • 1
    Email author
  • Norbert P. Südkamp
    • 1
  • Hagen Schmal
    • 1
  • Philipp Niemeyer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopedic Surgery and TraumatologyFreiburg University HospitalFreiburgGermany

Personalised recommendations