Advertisement

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

, Volume 132, Issue 7, pp 985–992 | Cite as

The Humerusblock NG: a new concept for stabilization of proximal humeral fractures and its biomechanical evaluation

  • Alexander Brunner
  • Herbert Resch
  • Reto Babst
  • Susanne Kathrein
  • Johann Fierlbeck
  • Alfred Niederberger
  • Werner Schmölz
Trauma Surgery

Abstract

Background

The Humerusblock NG represents a new semi-rigid angular stable fixation device for minimally invasive stabilization of proximal humeral fractures. This study evaluates the function and stability of the Humerusblock NG and its biomechanical properties on the basis of two different fracture models under cyclic loading.

Methods

Six fresh frozen human humeri were tested in a dynamic shoulder joint abduction motion test bench, simulating abduction between 15° and 45°. A stable wedge fracture with intact medial hinge and an unstable fracture with 5-mm gap were loaded for 500 cycles. Radiological measurement of implant migration was performed.

Results

The stable fracture model showed a slow constant fracture settling. The unstable fracture model showed initial fracture settling with closure of the medial fracture gap during the first 20 cycles. Thereafter, a slow constant settling of the fracture was measured comparable to the stable fracture model. Maximum varus tilt was 3.17° for the stable and 3.68° for the unstable fracture pattern. Radiological analysis showed no change in the tip apex distance and a significant settling of the implants fixation pins in the unstable fracture model. None of the specimen failed during the testing.

Conclusion

The Humerusblock NG allows for angular stable dynamic fixation of two-part proximal humeral fractures. It enables closure of the fracture gap and maintains fracture compression during loading, a concept already established in the stabilization of femoral neck fractures (dynamic hip screw). Clinical trials will be necessary to evaluate the value of this device in daily practice.

Level of evidence

Basic science study.

Keywords

Proximal humerus Fracture Percutaneous Minimally invasive Semi-rigid Fixation 

Notes

Conflict of interest

The biomechanical lab of the University of Innsbruck received institutional funds from Synthes GmbH, Austria as reimbursement for material and personal costs for conducting the experiments. The authors or their immediate family did not receive any personal funding or benefits.

References

  1. 1.
    Court-Brown CM, Caesar B (2006) Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury 37(8):691–697PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Court-Brown CM, Garg A, McQueen MM (2001) The epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 72(4):365–371PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baron JA, Karagas M, Barrett J, Kniffin W, Malenka D, Mayor M, Keller RB (1996) Basic epidemiology of fractures of the upper and lower limb among Americans over 65 years of age. Epidemiology 7(6):612–618PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brunner F, Sommer C, Bahrs C, Heuwinkel R, Hafner C, Rillmann P, Kohut G, Ekelund A, Muller M, Audige L, Babst R (2009) Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures using a proximal humeral locked plate: a prospective multicenter analysis. J Orthop Trauma 23(3):163–172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hirschmann MT, Quarz V, Audige L, Ludin D, Messmer P, Regazzoni P, Gross T (2007) Internal fixation of unstable proximal humerus fractures with an anatomically preshaped interlocking plate: a clinical and radiologic evaluation. J Trauma 63(6):1314–1323PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Moonot P, Ashwood N, Hamlet M (2007) Early results for treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus using the PHILOS plate system. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(9):1206–1209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sosef N, Stobbe I, Hogervorst M, Mommers L, Verbruggen J, van der Elst M, Rhemrev S (2007) The Polarus intramedullary nail for proximal humeral fractures: outcome in 28 patients followed for 1 year. Acta Orthop 78(3):436–441PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhu Y, Lu Y, Wang M, Jiang C (2010) Treatment of proximal humeral fracture with a proximal humeral nail. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19(2):297–302PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Edwards SL, Wilson NA, Zhang LQ, Flores S, Merk BR (2006) Two-part surgical neck fractures of the proximal part of the humerus. A biomechanical evaluation of two fixation techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(10):2258–2264. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00757 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Foruria AM, Carrascal MT, Revilla C, Munuera L, Sanchez-Sotelo J (2010) Proximal humerus fracture rotational stability after fixation using a locking plate or a fixed-angle locked nail: the role of implant stiffness. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 25(4):307–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fuchtmeier B, May R, Hente R, Maghsudi M, Volk M, Hammer J, Nerlich M, Prantl L (2007) Proximal humerus fractures: a comparative biomechanical analysis of intra and extramedullary implants. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127(6):441–447PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Miller DL, Goswami T (2007) A review of locking compression plate biomechanics and their advantages as internal fixators in fracture healing. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 22(10):1049–1062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Seide K, Triebe J, Faschingbauer M, Schulz AP, Puschel K, Mehrtens G, Jurgens C (2007) Locked versus unlocked plate osteosynthesis of the proximal humerus: a biomechanical study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 22(2):176–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Siffri PC, Peindl RD, Coley ER, Norton J, Connor PM, Kellam JF (2006) Biomechanical analysis of blade plate versus locking plate fixation for a proximal humerus fracture: comparison using cadaveric and synthetic humeri. J Orthop Trauma 20(8):547–554PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Walsh S, Reindl R, Harvey E, Berry G, Beckman L, Steffen T (2006) Biomechanical comparison of a unique locking plate versus a standard plate for internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures in a cadaveric model. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 21(10):1027–1031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Charalambous CP, Siddique I, Valluripalli K, Kovacevic M, Panose P, Srinivasan M, Marynissen H (2007) Proximal humeral internal locking system (PHILOS) for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127(3):205–210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Robinson CM, Bell KM, Court-Brown CM, McQueen MM (1992) Locked nailing of humeral shaft fractures. Experience in Edinburgh over a two-year period. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74(4):558–562PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Maldonado ZM, Seebeck J, Heller MO, Brandt D, Hepp P, Lill H, Duda GN (2003) Straining of the intact and fractured proximal humerus under physiological-like loading. J Biomech 36(12):1865–1873PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gardner MJ, Nork SE, Huber P, Krieg JC (2010) Less rigid stable fracture fixation in osteoporotic bone using locked plates with near cortical slots. Injury 41(6):652–656PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hessmann MH, Sternstein W, Mehler D, Korner J, Hofmann A, Rommens PM (2004) Are angle-fixed implants with elastic properties advantageous for the internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures? Biomed Tech (Berl) 49(12):345–350. doi: 10.1515/BMT.2004.064 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Brunner A, Weller K, Thormann S, Jockel JA, Babst R (2010) Closed reduction and minimally invasive percutaneous fixation of proximal humerus fractures using the Humerusblock. J Orthop Trauma 24(7):407–413PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jöckel JA, Brunner A, Thormann S, Babst R (2010) Elastic stabilisation of proximal humeral fractures with a new percutaneous angular stable fixation device (ButtonFix(R)): a preliminary report. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130(11):1397–1403PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Resch H, Hubner C, Schwaiger R (2001) Minimally invasive reduction and osteosynthesis of articular fractures of the humeral head. Injury 32(Suppl 1):SA25–SA32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bogner R, Hubner C, Matis N, Auffarth A, Lederer S, Resch H (2008) Minimally-invasive treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90(12):1602–1607PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Krappinger D, Roth T, Gschwentner M, Suckert A, Blauth M, Hengg C, Kralinger F (2012) Preoperative assessment of the cancellous bone mineral density of the proximal humerus using CT data. Skeletal Radiol 41(3):299–304PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Poppen NK, Walker PS (1978) Forces at the glenohumeral joint in abduction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 135:165–170PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ringelberg JA (1985) EMG and force production of some human shoulder muscles during isometric abduction. J Biomech 18(12):939–947PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chen CY, Chao EK, Tu YK, Ueng SW, Shih CH (1998) Closed management and percutaneous fixation of unstable proximal humerus fractures. J Trauma 45(6):1039–1045PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Park MC, Murthi AM, Roth NS, Blaine TA, Levine WN, Bigliani LU (2003) Two-part and three-part fractures of the proximal humerus treated with suture fixation. J Orthop Trauma 17(5):319–325PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wanner GA, Wanner-Schmid E, Romero J, Hersche O, von Smekal A, Trentz O, Ertel W (2003) Internal fixation of displaced proximal humeral fractures with two one-third tubular plates. J Trauma 54(3):536–544PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zettl R, Muller T, Topp T, Lewan U, Kruger A, Kuhne C, Ruchholtz S (2011) Monoaxial versus polyaxial locking systems: a biomechanical analysis of different locking systems for the fixation of proximal humeral fractures. Int Orthop 35(8):1245–1250PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bae JH, Oh JK, Chon CS, Oh CW, Hwang JH, Yoon YC (2011) The biomechanical performance of locking plate fixation with intramedullary fibular strut graft augmentation in the treatment of unstable fractures of the proximal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(7):937–941PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bottlang M, Doornink J, Byrd GD, Fitzpatrick DC, Madey SM (2009) A nonlocking end screw can decrease fracture risk caused by locked plating in the osteoporotic diaphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(3):620–627PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Curtis R, Goldhahn J, Schwyn R, Regazzoni P, Suhm N (2005) Fixation principles in metaphyseal bone—a patent based review. Osteoporos Int 16(Suppl 2):S54–S64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Micic ID, Kim KC, Shin DJ, Shin SJ, Kim PT, Park IH, Jeon IH (2009) Analysis of early failure of the locking compression plate in osteoporotic proximal humerus fractures. J Orthop Sci 14(5):596–601. doi: 10.1007/s00776-009-1382-3 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bergmann G, Graichen F, Bender A, Rohlmann A, Halder A, Beier A, Westerhoff P (2010) In vivo gleno-humeral joint loads during forward flexion and abduction. J Biomech 44(8):1543–1552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Terrier A, Reist A, Merlini F, Farron A (2008) Simulated joint and muscle forces in reversed and anatomic shoulder prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90(6):751–756. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B6.19708 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Osterhoff G, Baumgartner D, Favre P, Wanner GA, Gerber H, Simmen HP, Werner CM (2011) Medial support by fibula bone graft in angular stable plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures: an in vitro study with synthetic bone. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20(5):740–746. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.10.040 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Noordeen MH, Lavy CB, Shergill NS, Tuite JD, Jackson AM (1995) Cyclical micromovement and fracture healing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77(4):645–648PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexander Brunner
    • 1
  • Herbert Resch
    • 3
  • Reto Babst
    • 2
  • Susanne Kathrein
    • 1
  • Johann Fierlbeck
    • 4
  • Alfred Niederberger
    • 4
  • Werner Schmölz
    • 1
  1. 1.Department for Trauma Surgery and Sports MedicineMedical University InnsbruckInnsbruckAustria
  2. 2.Department of Trauma SurgeryCantonal Hospital LucerneLucerneSwitzerland
  3. 3.Department of Traumatology and Sports InjuriesUniversity Hospital SalzburgSalzburgAustria
  4. 4.Synthes Innovation WorkshopSalzburgAustria

Personalised recommendations