Advertisement

Anatomical structures at risk with the proud retrograde femoral nail

  • Hans Clement
  • Nima HeidariEmail author
  • Dennis Kosuge
  • Wolfgang Grechenig
  • Norbert P. Tesch
  • Annelie M. Weinberg
Trauma Surgery

Abstract

Background

Post-operative knee pain is common following retrograde nailing, with its etiology often multifactorial although a well-established cause is nail protrusion from the intercondylar notch. The aim of this study was to assess the structures at risk if the nail is left proud of the femoral articular surface.

Methods

A retrograde femoral nail (Synthes Distal Femoral Nail®) was inserted into the distal femur of 15 cadaveric lower limbs using the standard technique. The nail was left 10 mm proud of the articular surface and locked in this position. The knee was then put through a full range of movement while recording the intra-articular structures that came into contact with the distal end of the nail as well as the position of the knee when this occurred. This was repeated with the nail 5 mm proud.

Results

With the nail 10 mm proud, it impinged on the anterior horn of the medial meniscus in 14 cases and the anterior horn of the medial meniscus as well as the tibial insertion of the ACL in one case at 15° of flexion. At 70° of flexion the nail came into contact with the distal margin of the patellar articular surface in the midline in all 15 cases.

With the nail 5 mm proud, it impinged on the anterior horn of the medial meniscus in seven cases and the tibial insertion of the ACL as well as the anterior horn of the medial meniscus in eight cases as the knee was brought into full extension. In flexion the distal margin of the patellar articular surface in the midline came into contact with the nail at 70° of flexion in all 15 cases.

Conclusion

Correct positioning of a retrograde femoral nail is of paramount importance to avoid further iatrogenic injury to intra-articular structures.

Keywords

Retrograde femoral nailing Protruding retrograde femoral nail Complications of femoral nailing 

References

  1. 1.
    Acharya KN, Rao MR (2006) Retrograde nailing for distal third femoral shaft fractures: a prospective study. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 14(3):253–258Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aglietti P, Insall JN, Walker PS, Trent P (1975) A new patella prosthesis. Design and application. Clin Orthop Relat Res 107:175–187Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Atkinson PJ, Haut RC (1995) Subfracture insult to the human cadaver patellofemoral joint produces occult injury. J Orthop Res 13(6):936–944PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Born CT, King PJ, Rehman S, Khoury L, Delong WG Jr (2006) Arthroscopically-assisted removal of retrograde intramedullary femoral nails. J Orthop Trauma 20(3):212–215PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dickson KF, Galland MW, Barrack RL, Neitzschman HR, Harris MB, Myers L, Vrahas MS (2002) Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee after ipsilateral femur fracture. J Orthop Trauma 16(8):567–571PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grass R, Biewener A, Rammelt S, Zwipp H (2002) Retrograde locking nail osteosynthesis of distal femoral fractures with the distal femoral nail (DFN). Unfallchirurg 105(4):298–314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Green S (1988) Distal intramedullary fixation of supracondylar fractures of the femur. Tech Orthop 3:71–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gregory P, DiCicco J, Karpik K, DiPasquale T, Herscovici D, Sanders R (1996) Ipsilateral fractures of the femur and tibia: treatment with retrograde femoral nailing and unreamed tibial nailing. J Orthop Trauma 10(5):309–316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Herscovici D Jr, Ricci WM, McAndrews P, DiPasquale T, Sanders R (2000) Treatment of femoral shaft fracture using unreamed interlocked nails. J Orthop Trauma 14(1):10–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Herscovici D Jr. (1996), Whiteman KW. Retrograde nailing of the femur using an intercondylar approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 332:98–104Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Moed BR, Watson JT (1995) Retrograde intramedullary nailing, without reaming, of fractures of the femoral shaft in multiply injured patients. J Bone Jt Surg Am 77(10):1520–1527Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Moed BR, Watson JT, Cramer KE, Karges DE, Teefey JS (1998) Unreamed retrograde intramedullary nailing of fractures of the femoral shaft. J Orthop Trauma 12(5):334–342PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Morgan E, Ostrum RF, DiCicco J, McElroy J, Poka A (1999) Effects of retrograde femoral intramedullary nailing on the patellofemoral articulation. J Orthop Trauma 13(1):13–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Murray P, Bergin P, Labropoulos P, Gunther S (2008) Retrograde femoral nailing and knee function. Orthopedics 31(10):e1–e8Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ostrum RF (2000) Treatment of floating knee injuries through a single percutaneous approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 375:43–50Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ostrum RF, Agarwal A, Lakatos R, Poka A (2000) Prospective comparison of retrograde and antegrade femoral intramedullary nailing. J Orthop Trauma 14(7):496–501PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ostrum RF, Storm S, White K (2009) The epiphyseal scar as a radiographic landmark for retrograde femoral nail insertion. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 38(9):442–444Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Papadokostakis G, Papakostidis C, Dimitriou R, Giannoudis PV (2005) The role and efficacy of retrograding nailing for the treatment of diaphyseal and distal femoral fractures: a systematic review of the literature. Injury 36(7):813–822PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ricci WM, Bellabarba C, Evanoff B, Herscovici D, DiPasquale T, Sanders R (2001) Retrograde versus antegrade nailing of femoral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma 15(3):161–169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sanders R, Koval KJ, DiPasquale T, Helfet DL, Frankle M (1993) Retrograde reamed femoral nailing. J Orthop Trauma 7(4):293–302PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Seifert J, Stengel D, Matthes G, Hinz P, Ekkernkamp A, Ostermann PA (2003) Retrograde fixation of distal femoral fractures: results using a new nail system. J Orthop Trauma 17(7):488–495PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Thiel W (1992) The preservation of the whole corpse with natural color. Ann Anat 174(3):185–195PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tornetta P III, Tiburzi D (2000) Antegrade or retrograde reamed femoral nailing. A prospective, randomised trial. J Bone Jt Surg Br 82(5):652–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans Clement
    • 1
  • Nima Heidari
    • 2
  • Dennis Kosuge
    • 3
  • Wolfgang Grechenig
    • 1
  • Norbert P. Tesch
    • 4
  • Annelie M. Weinberg
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of TraumatologyMedical University of GrazGrazAustria
  2. 2.Department of Paediatric and Adolescent SurgeryMedical University of GrazGrazAustria
  3. 3.Department of Trauma & Orthopaedic SurgeryThe Princess Alexandra HospitalHarlow, EssexUnited Kingdom
  4. 4.Institute of AnatomyMedical University of GrazGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations