Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

, Volume 130, Issue 6, pp 765–774

Indications and contraindications for vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty

  • Marc Röllinghoff
  • Kourosh Zarghooni
  • Klaus Schlüter-Brust
  • Rolf Sobottke
  • Ulf Schlegel
  • Peer Eysel
  • Karl-Stefan Delank
Osteoporotic Fracture Management



Vertebral fractures (VF) are a leading cause of morbidity in the elderly. In the past decade, minimally invasive bone augmentation techniques for VF, such as percutaneous vertebroplasty (VP) and kyphoplasty (KP) have become more widespread. According to the literature, both techniques provide significant pain relief. However, KP is more expensive and technically more demanding than VP. The current study surveyed German surgeons who practice percutaneous augmentation to evaluate and compare decisions regarding the implementation of these techniques. Is there a difference in the indications and contraindications of VP and KP compared with the interdisciplinary consensus paper on VP and KP of the German medical association in the treatment of VF?


A multiple choice questionnaire was designed with questions regarding diagnostic procedures, clinical and radiologic (AO classification) indications, as well as contraindications for both VP and KP. A panel of five experts refined the initial questionnaire. The final version was then sent to 580 clinics registered to practice KP in Germany. The statistical analysis was done by two authors, who collected the questionnaire data and Wilcoxon’s signed ranks test was performed for non-parametric variables with SPSS.


327 of 580 questionnaires (56.4%) were completed and returned. 151 (46.2%) of participants were performing both procedures, and 176 (53.8%) performed KP only. Median duration from onset of acute pain to intervention was 3 weeks. For most participants (95.4%), consistent back pain at the fracture level with a visual analog scale score over 5 was the main clinical indication for VP and KP. A1 and A3.1 fractures from osteoporosis and metastasis were considered indications for KP. Osteoporotic A1.1 fractures were an indication for VP. Traumatic A3.2 fractures were not an indication for either procedure. Major contraindications to both procedures were active infection (94.7%), cement allergy (86.8%), and coagulation disorders (80.3%).


Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty both have roles in the treatment of vertebral fractures. However, we could see differences in the indications for the two percutaneous techniques. Participants of this study found more indications for KP versus VP in cases of painful A1.2 and A3.1 fractures due to osteoporosis, metastasis, and trauma. About half of the respondents reported that VP is indicated for osteoporotic and pathologic A1.1 fractures. This study offers only limited conclusions. Open questionnaires and prospective data from all clinicians performing these procedures should be analyzed to offer more specific information.


Vertebroplasty Kyphoplasty Radiology Indication Spine fracture Contraindication Osteoporosis 


  1. 1.
    Bierschneider M, Sabo D, Meeder PJ (2005) Interdisziplinäres Konsensuspapier zur Vertebroplastie/Kyphoplastie. Fortschr Röntgenstr 177:1590–1592Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Black DM, Cummings SR, Karpf DB, Cauley JA, Thompson DE, Nevitt MC, Bauer DC, Genant HK, Haskell WL, Marcus R, Ott SM, Torner JC, Quandt SA, Reiss TF, Ensrud KE (1996) Randomised trial of effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with existing vertebral fractures. Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group. Lancet 348:1535–1541CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Borgström F, Zethraeus N, Johnell O, Lidgren L, Ponzer S, Sevensson O, Abdon P, Ornstein E, Lunsjö K, Thorngren KG, Sernbo I, Rehnberg C, Jönsson B (2006) Costs and quality of life associated with osteoporosis-related fractures in Sweden. Osteoporos Int 17(5):637–650. doi:10.1007/s00198-005-0015-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bouza C, López T, Magro A, Navalpotro L, Amate JM (2006) Efficacy and safety of balloon kyphoplasty in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures: a systematic review. Eur Spine J 15(7):1050–1067. doi:10.1007/s00586-005-0048-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bouza C, López-Cuadrado T, Cediel P, Saz-Parkinson Z, Amate JM (2009) Balloon kyphoplasty in malignant spinal fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Palliat Care 8:12. doi:10.1186/1471-684X-8-12 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chiras J, Depriester C, Weill A, Sola-Martinez MT, Deramond H (1997) Percutaneous vertebral surgery. Technics and indications. J Neuroradiol 24(1):45–59PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cooper C, Atkinson EJ, O’Fallon WM, Melton LJ 3d (1992) Incidence of clinically diagnosed vertebral fractures: a population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota, 1985–1989. J Bone Minor Res 7:221–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cotten A, Dewatre F, Cortet B, Assaker R, Leblond D, Duquesnoy B, Chastanet P, Clarisse J (1996) Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteolytic metastases and myeloma: effects of the percentage of lesion filling and leakage of methyl methacrylate at clinical follow up. Radiology 200(2):525–530PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fourney, Schomer DF, Nader R, Chlan-Fourney J, Suki D, Ahrar K, Rhines LD, Goskaslan ZL (2003) Percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty of painful vertebral body fractures patients. J Neurosurg 98(1 Suppl):21–30PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Galibert P, Deramond H, Rosat P, Le Gras D (1987) Note preminaire sur le traitement des angiomes vertebraux par vertebroplastie acrylique percutanee. Neurochirurgie 33(2):166–168PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gangi A, Dietemann JL, Schultz A, Caffarati G, Roy C (1997) Value of percutaneous injection of acrylic cement using a pressure regulator. J Radiol 78(5):393–394PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gangi A, Guth S, Imbert JP, Marin H, Dietemann JL (2003) Percutaneous vertebroplasty: indications, technique, and results. Radiographics 23(e2):e10CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gangi A, Sabharwal T, Irani FG, Buy X, Morales JP, Adam A (2006) Standards of Practice Committee of the Society of Interventional Radiology Quality assurance guidelines for percutaneous vertebroplasty. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 29(2):173–178. doi:10.1007/s00270-005-0146-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Grafin SR, Yuan HA, Reiley MA (2001) New technologies in spine: kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for the treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26(14):1511–1515Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hulme PA, Krebs J, Ferguson SJ, Berlemann U (2006) Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: a systematic review of 69 clinical studies. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31(17):1983–2001Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jang JS, Lee SH, Jung SK (2002) Pulmonary embolism of polymethylmethacrylate after percutaneous vertebroplasty: a case report of three cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27(19):416–418Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kado DM, Browner WS, Palermo L, Nevitt MC, Genant HK, Cummings SR (1999) Vertebral fractures and mortality in older women: a prospective study. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Arch Intern Med 159(11):1215–1220CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kasperk C, Nöldge G, Grafe I, Meeder P, Huber F, Nawroth P (2008) Indications and results of kypho- and vertebroplasty. Internist (Berl.) 49(10):1206, 1208–1210, 1212–1218. doi:10.1007/s00108-008-2116-x
  19. 19.
    Maestretti G, Cremer C, Otten P, Jakob RP (2007) Prospective study of standalone balloon kyphoplasty with calcium phosphate cement augmentation in traumatic fractures. Eur Spine J 16(5):601–610. doi:10.1007/s00586-006-0258-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Magerl F, Aebi M, Gertzbein SD, Harms J, Nazarian S (1994) A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries. Eur Spine J 3(4):184–201. doi:10.1007/s00586-006-0258-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nevitt MC, Thompson DE, Black DM, Rubin SR, Ensrud K, Yates AJ, Cummings SR (2000) Effect of alendronate on limited-activity days and bed-disability days caused by back pain in postmenopausal women with existing vertebral fractures. Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group. Arch Intern Med 160(1):77–85CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nöldge G, DaFonseca K, Grafe I, Libicher M, Hillmeier J, Meeder PJ, Kauffmann GW, Kasperk C (2006) Balloon kyphoplasty in the treatment of back pain. Radiologe 46(6):506–512. doi:10.1007/s00117-006-1384-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pflugmacher R, Agarwal A, Kandziora F, K-Klostermann C (2009) Balloon kyphoplasty combined with posterior instrumentation for the treatment of burst fractures of the spine-1-year results. J Orthop Trauma 23(2):126–131. doi:10.1097/BOT.0b013e318193dad5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Riggs BL, Melton LJ 3rd (1995) The worldwide problem of osteoporosis: insights afforded by epidemiology. Bone 17(5 Suppl):505S–511SCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Röllinghoff M, Sobottke R, Koy T, Delank KS, Eysel P (2008) Minimally invasive surgery of the lumbar spine 2. Z Orthop Unfall 146(3):395–408. doi:10.1055/s-2008-1038546 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Röllinghoff M, Siewe J, Zarghooni K, Sobottke R, Alparslan Y, Eysel P, Delank KS (2009) Effectiveness, security and height restoration on fresh compression fractures-a comparative prospective study of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. Minim Invas Neurosurg 52(5-6):233–237. doi:10.1055/s-0029-1243631 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schmidt R, Richter M, Puhl W, Cakir B (2005) Vertebroplasty-basic science, indications and technique. Zentralbl Chir 130(5):476–484. doi:10.1055/s-2005-836875 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schnabel M, Weber M, Vassiliou T, Mann D, Kirschner M, Gotzen L, Kaluza G (2004) Diagnosis and therapy of acute complaints after “whiplash injury” in Germany. Results of a representative survey at surgical and trauma departments in Germany. Unfallchirurg 4:300–306. doi:10.1007/s00113-004-0740-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schofer MD, Illian CH, Illian JB, Kortmann HR (2008) Balloon kyphoplasty for recent vertebral fractures in the elderly. Orthopaede 37(5):462–469. doi:10.1007/s00132-008-1220-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Silverman SL (1992) The clinical consequences of vertebral compression fracture. Bone 13(Suppl 2):27–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Silverman SL, Piziak VK, Chen P et al (2005) Relationship of health related quality of life to prevalent and new or worsening back pain in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. J Rheumatol 32:2405–2409PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Stallmeyer MJ, Zoarski GH, Obuchowski AM (2003) Optimising patient selection in percutaneous vertebroplasty. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 14(6):683–696Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Trumm CG, Jakobs TF, Zech CJ, Weber C, Reiser MF, Hoffmann RT (2006) Vertebroplasty in the treatment of back pain. Radiologe 46(6):495–505. doi:10.1007/s00117-006-1382-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yeom JS, Kim WJ, Choy WS, Lee CK, Chang BS, Kang JW (2003) Leakage of cement in percutaneous transpedicular vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic compression fractures. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 85(1):83–89. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.85B1.13026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marc Röllinghoff
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kourosh Zarghooni
    • 1
  • Klaus Schlüter-Brust
    • 1
  • Rolf Sobottke
    • 1
  • Ulf Schlegel
    • 1
  • Peer Eysel
    • 1
  • Karl-Stefan Delank
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma SurgeryUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryUniversity of CologneKölnGermany

Personalised recommendations