Indications and contraindications for vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty
- First Online:
- 675 Downloads
Vertebral fractures (VF) are a leading cause of morbidity in the elderly. In the past decade, minimally invasive bone augmentation techniques for VF, such as percutaneous vertebroplasty (VP) and kyphoplasty (KP) have become more widespread. According to the literature, both techniques provide significant pain relief. However, KP is more expensive and technically more demanding than VP. The current study surveyed German surgeons who practice percutaneous augmentation to evaluate and compare decisions regarding the implementation of these techniques. Is there a difference in the indications and contraindications of VP and KP compared with the interdisciplinary consensus paper on VP and KP of the German medical association in the treatment of VF?
A multiple choice questionnaire was designed with questions regarding diagnostic procedures, clinical and radiologic (AO classification) indications, as well as contraindications for both VP and KP. A panel of five experts refined the initial questionnaire. The final version was then sent to 580 clinics registered to practice KP in Germany. The statistical analysis was done by two authors, who collected the questionnaire data and Wilcoxon’s signed ranks test was performed for non-parametric variables with SPSS.
327 of 580 questionnaires (56.4%) were completed and returned. 151 (46.2%) of participants were performing both procedures, and 176 (53.8%) performed KP only. Median duration from onset of acute pain to intervention was 3 weeks. For most participants (95.4%), consistent back pain at the fracture level with a visual analog scale score over 5 was the main clinical indication for VP and KP. A1 and A3.1 fractures from osteoporosis and metastasis were considered indications for KP. Osteoporotic A1.1 fractures were an indication for VP. Traumatic A3.2 fractures were not an indication for either procedure. Major contraindications to both procedures were active infection (94.7%), cement allergy (86.8%), and coagulation disorders (80.3%).
Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty both have roles in the treatment of vertebral fractures. However, we could see differences in the indications for the two percutaneous techniques. Participants of this study found more indications for KP versus VP in cases of painful A1.2 and A3.1 fractures due to osteoporosis, metastasis, and trauma. About half of the respondents reported that VP is indicated for osteoporotic and pathologic A1.1 fractures. This study offers only limited conclusions. Open questionnaires and prospective data from all clinicians performing these procedures should be analyzed to offer more specific information.
KeywordsVertebroplasty Kyphoplasty Radiology Indication Spine fracture Contraindication Osteoporosis
- 1.Bierschneider M, Sabo D, Meeder PJ (2005) Interdisziplinäres Konsensuspapier zur Vertebroplastie/Kyphoplastie. Fortschr Röntgenstr 177:1590–1592Google Scholar
- 2.Black DM, Cummings SR, Karpf DB, Cauley JA, Thompson DE, Nevitt MC, Bauer DC, Genant HK, Haskell WL, Marcus R, Ott SM, Torner JC, Quandt SA, Reiss TF, Ensrud KE (1996) Randomised trial of effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with existing vertebral fractures. Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group. Lancet 348:1535–1541CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 3.Borgström F, Zethraeus N, Johnell O, Lidgren L, Ponzer S, Sevensson O, Abdon P, Ornstein E, Lunsjö K, Thorngren KG, Sernbo I, Rehnberg C, Jönsson B (2006) Costs and quality of life associated with osteoporosis-related fractures in Sweden. Osteoporos Int 17(5):637–650. doi:10.1007/s00198-005-0015-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 8.Cotten A, Dewatre F, Cortet B, Assaker R, Leblond D, Duquesnoy B, Chastanet P, Clarisse J (1996) Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteolytic metastases and myeloma: effects of the percentage of lesion filling and leakage of methyl methacrylate at clinical follow up. Radiology 200(2):525–530PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Gangi A, Sabharwal T, Irani FG, Buy X, Morales JP, Adam A (2006) Standards of Practice Committee of the Society of Interventional Radiology Quality assurance guidelines for percutaneous vertebroplasty. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 29(2):173–178. doi:10.1007/s00270-005-0146-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Grafin SR, Yuan HA, Reiley MA (2001) New technologies in spine: kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for the treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26(14):1511–1515Google Scholar
- 15.Hulme PA, Krebs J, Ferguson SJ, Berlemann U (2006) Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: a systematic review of 69 clinical studies. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31(17):1983–2001Google Scholar
- 16.Jang JS, Lee SH, Jung SK (2002) Pulmonary embolism of polymethylmethacrylate after percutaneous vertebroplasty: a case report of three cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27(19):416–418Google Scholar
- 18.Kasperk C, Nöldge G, Grafe I, Meeder P, Huber F, Nawroth P (2008) Indications and results of kypho- and vertebroplasty. Internist (Berl.) 49(10):1206, 1208–1210, 1212–1218. doi:10.1007/s00108-008-2116-x
- 21.Nevitt MC, Thompson DE, Black DM, Rubin SR, Ensrud K, Yates AJ, Cummings SR (2000) Effect of alendronate on limited-activity days and bed-disability days caused by back pain in postmenopausal women with existing vertebral fractures. Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group. Arch Intern Med 160(1):77–85CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 26.Röllinghoff M, Siewe J, Zarghooni K, Sobottke R, Alparslan Y, Eysel P, Delank KS (2009) Effectiveness, security and height restoration on fresh compression fractures-a comparative prospective study of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. Minim Invas Neurosurg 52(5-6):233–237. doi:10.1055/s-0029-1243631 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Schnabel M, Weber M, Vassiliou T, Mann D, Kirschner M, Gotzen L, Kaluza G (2004) Diagnosis and therapy of acute complaints after “whiplash injury” in Germany. Results of a representative survey at surgical and trauma departments in Germany. Unfallchirurg 4:300–306. doi:10.1007/s00113-004-0740-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Stallmeyer MJ, Zoarski GH, Obuchowski AM (2003) Optimising patient selection in percutaneous vertebroplasty. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 14(6):683–696Google Scholar