Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

, Volume 130, Issue 5, pp 693–698 | Cite as

The use of weightbearing radiographs to assess the stability of supination-external rotation fractures of the ankle

  • Martin Weber
  • Helge Burmeister
  • Gerhard Flueckiger
  • Fabian G. Krause
Orthopaedic Outcome Assessment



Isolated lateral malleolar fractures usually result from a supination-external rotation (SER) injury and may include a deltoid ligament rupture. The necessity of operative treatment is based on the recognition of a relevant medial soft-tissue disruption. Currently used tests to assess ankle stability include manual stress radiographs and gravity stress radiographs, but seem to overestimate the need for fracture fixation.


We investigated the use of weightbearing radiographs to distinguish stable and unstable isolated lateral malleolar fractures induced by the SER mechanism in 57 patients. Patients with stable fractures (SER type II according to the Lauge-Hansen classification) were treated non-operatively with varying external support. Forty-seven patients were evaluated by questionnaire and AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score. Follow-up was 18–120 months (mean 62).


Fifty-one of fifty-seven (90%) patients were found to have stable fractures (SER type II) and were treated non-operatively. The AOFAS score was 96.1 points on average (range 85–100) at latest follow-up. Four patients reported minor complaints. A “moderate” correlation of risk factors (i.e. smoking) to delayed bone healing was found while the correlation of varying external support (i.e. bandage, cast) to the AOFAS score and delayed bone healing was “poor”.


The use of weightbearing radiographs is an easy, pain-free, safe and reliable method to exclude the need for operative treatment, with excellent clinical outcome in the majority of the patients seen at latest follow-up. The delay of 3–10 days until the decision about surgical treatment is well accepted by the patients.


Ankle Fracture Stability assessment Radiographs Non-operative treatment 


  1. 1.
    Lauge-Hansen N, Ankelbrud I (1942) Genetisk diagnose og reposition (Fractures of the ankle, I: genetic diagnose and treatment). Dissertation. Munskgaard, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Müller ME, Allgöwer M, Schneider R, Willenegger H (1991) Manual of internal fixation. Techniques recommended by the AO-ASIF group, 3rd edn. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bauer M, Jonsson K, Nilsson B (1985) Thirty-year follow-up of ankle fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 56:103–106PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yde J, Kristensen KD (1980) Ankle fractures. Supination-eversion fractures stage II. Primary and late results of operative and non-operative treatment. Acta Orthop Scand 51(4):695–702PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Egol KA, Amirtharajah M, Tejwani NC, Capla EL, Koval KJ (2004) Ankle stress test for predicting the need for surgical fixation of isolated fibular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86(11):2393–2398PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McConnell T, Creevy W, Tornetta P 3rd (2004) Stress examination of supination external rotation-type fibular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86(10):2171–2178PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gill JB, Risko T, Raducan V, Grimes JS, Schutt RC Jr (2007) Comparison of manual and gravity stress radiographs for the evaluation of supination-external rotation fibular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(5):994–999CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Michelson JD, Varner KE, Checcone M (2001) Diagnosing deltoid injury in ankle fractures: the gravity stress view. Clin Orthop Rel Res 387:178–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schock HJ, Pinzur M, Manion L, Stover M (2007) The use of gravity or manual-stress radiographs in the assessment of supination-external rotation fractures of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(8):1055–1059CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Easley M, Trnka H, Schon L, Myerson M (2000) Isolated subtalar arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82(5):613–624PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS, Sanders M (1994) Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int 15:349–353PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chan YH (2003) Correlational analysis (Biostatistics 104). Singap Med J 44:614–619Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yde J, Kristensen KD (1980) Ankle fractures: supination-eversion fractures of stage IV. Primary and late results of operative and non-operative treatment. Acta Orthop Scand 51(6):981–990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Egol KA, Tejwani NC, Walsh MG, Capla EL, Koval KJ (2006) Predictors of short-term functional outcome following ankle fracture surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(5):974–979CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Park SS, Kubiak EN, Egol KA, Kummer F, Koval KJ (2006) Stress radiographs after ankle fracture: the effect of ankle position and deltoid ligament status on medial clear space measurements. J Orthop Trauma 20(1):11–18CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kristensen KD, Hansen T (1985) Closed treatment of ankle fractures: stage II supination-eversion fractures followed for 20 years. Acta Orthop Scand 56:107–109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Michelson JD, Magid D, McHale K (2007) Clinical utility of a stability based ankle fracture classification system. J Orthop Trauma 21:307–315CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gougoulias N, Khanna A, Sakellariou A, Maffulli N (2009) Supination-external rotation ankle fractures stability a key issue. Clin Orthop Relat Res (epub ahead of print)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Finnan R, Funk L, Pinzur MS, Rabin S, Lomasney L, Jukenelis D (2005) Health related quality of life in patients with supination-external rotation stage IV ankle fractures. Foot Ankle Int 26(12):1038–1041PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Weber
    • 1
  • Helge Burmeister
    • 2
  • Gerhard Flueckiger
    • 3
  • Fabian G. Krause
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryUniversity of Bern, InselspitalBernSwitzerland
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryKantonsspitalSchwyzSwitzerland
  3. 3.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryZieglerspitalBerneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations