Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the German version of the Western Ontario shoulder instability index
- 342 Downloads
The Western Ontario shoulder instability index (WOSI) is a disease-specific quality of life measurement tool with 21 items for patients with shoulder instability. Here, we report on translation and validation of the German version of the WOSI according to international guidelines.
Patients and methods
A total of 86 patients in three groups were included in this study. In group I, 24 patients underwent surgical stabilization of the shoulder. Preoperatively and at 12 months post-operatively the WOSI, Rowe score, UCLA, Constant score, and the SF-36 were evaluated. In group II, 25 patients were evaluated 2.6 ± 1.2 years after sustaining a primary traumatic shoulder dislocation. Group III consisted of 37 healthy men and women with normal, healthy shoulders. Evaluation of Pearson’s correlation coefficient between WOSI and Rowe score, UCLA, SF-36 and Constant score and for test–retest reliability was made. Moreover, Cronbach’s alpha and floor, and ceiling effects were analyzed.
Internal consistency was high (Cronbach’s alpha 0.92).Test–retest reliability (Pearson correlation coefficient) was excellent (r = 0.92). The construct validity showed a significant correlation between the WOSI and the scores investigated. There were no floor or ceiling effects for the German WOSI score.
The German translation of the WOSI is a valid and reliable tool, applicable to outcome studies on patients with shoulder instability.
KeywordsShoulder instability Quality of life Score WOSI Translation Validation
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflict of interest. We certify that no party having a direct interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on us or on any organization with which we are associated.
- 30.Secherst L, Fay TL, Zaidi SM (1972) Problems of translation in cross-cultural research. J Cross Cult Psychol 3:41–56Google Scholar
- 31.Portney LG, Watkins MP (2000) Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
- 32.Nunnally JC, Bernstein ICH (1994) Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill, New York CityGoogle Scholar
- 35.Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res (214):160–164Google Scholar
- 36.Amstutz HC, Sew Hoy AL, Clarke IC (1981) UCLA anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (155):7–20Google Scholar
- 41.Richards RR, An KE, Bigliani LU, Friedman RJ, Gartsman GM, Gristina AG (1994) A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 3:347–352Google Scholar