Advertisement

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

, Volume 130, Issue 5, pp 605–611 | Cite as

Minimal invasive fixation of proximal humeral fractures with an intramedullary nail: good results in elderly patients

  • Nico SosefEmail author
  • Roderick van Leerdam
  • Pieter Ott
  • Sven Meylaerts
  • Steven Rhemrev
Orthopaedic Surgery

Abstract

Objective

To report on the results of a minimally invasive technique for the fixation of displaced proximal humeral fractures with a locked intramedullary nail.

Patients and methods

All consecutive patients treated with a T2™ intramedullary nail between 2004 and 2007 were evaluated. Thirty-three patients were included [mean age 78, m:f ratio (1:4)]. Fracture characteristics were classified according to AO and Neer (eighteen 2-part, eleven 3-part, five 4-part fractures).

Results

Functional outcome (Constant Score) was excellent in nine, satisfactory in eight and poor in three patients. Subjective outcome was satisfactory to good for patients with 2-part and 3-part fractures but poor for 4-part fractures. Major complications comprised four fixation failures, two cases of impingement and one deep infection.

Conclusions

Minimally invasive fixation of displaced 2-part and 3-part humeral fractures in an elderly population shows satisfactory to excellent results in 80% of patients.

Keywords

Humeral Proximal PHN Nail T2 Fracture 

Notes

Conflict of interest statement

There is no conflict of interest in this study.

Reference

  1. 1.
    Adedapo AO, Ikpeme JO (2001) The results of internal fixation of three- and four-part proximal humeral fractures with the Polarus nail. Injury 32:115–121CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bufquin T, Hersan A, Hubert L et al (2007) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly: a prospective review of 43 cases with a short-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:516–520CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 160–164Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Court-Brown GargA, McQueen MM (2001) The epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 72:365–371PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Diercks RL (2003) Proximale humerus fracturen: prothese of osteosynthese? Ned Tijdschr Trauma 6:158–164Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Edwards SL, Wilson NA, Zhang LQ et al (2006) Two-part surgical neck fractures of the proximal part of the humerus. A biomechanical evaluation of two fixation techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:2258–2264CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Frangen TM, Muller EJ, Dudda M et al (2007) Proximal humeral fractures in geriatric patients. Is the angle-stable plate osteosynthesis really a breakthrough? Acta Orthop Belg 73:571–579PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gaebler C, McQueen MM, Court-Brown C (2003) Minimally displaced proximal humeral fractures: epidemiology and outcome in 507 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 74:580–585PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gardner MJ, Weil Y, Barker JU et al (2007) The importance of medial support in locked plating of proximal humerus fractures. J Orthop Trauma 21(3):185–191CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gronhagen CM, Abbaszadegan H, Revay SA et al (2007) Medium-term results after primary hemiarthroplasty for comminute proximal humerus fractures: a study of 46 patients followed up for an average of 4.4 years. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16:766–773CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Handoll HHG, Gibson JNA, Madhok R (2003) Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD000434Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hente R, Kampshoff J, Kinner B et al (2004) Treatment of dislocated 3- and 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus with an angle-stabilizing fixation plate. Unfallchirurg 107:769–782CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hessler C, Schmucker U, Matthes G et al (2006) Results after treatment of instable fractures of the proximal humerus using a fixed-angle plate. Unfallchirurg 109:864–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hodgson SA, Mawson SJ, Saxton JM et al (2007) Rehabilitation of two-part fractures of the neck of the humerus (two-year follow-up). J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16:143–145CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Katolik LI, Romeo AA, Cole BJ et al (2005) Normalization of the Constant score. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 14:279–285CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Koval KJ, Gallagher MA, Marsicano JG et al (1997) Functional outcome after minimally displaced fractures of the proximal part of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:203–207PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    L’Insalata JC, Warren RF, Cohen SB et al (1997) A self-administered questionnaire for assessment of symptoms and function of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:738–748CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Neer CS (2006) Displaced proximal humeral fractures: part I. Classification and evaluation, 1970. Clin Orthop Relat Res 442:77–82CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nho SJ, Brophy RH, Barker JU et al (2007) Management of proximal humeral fractures based on current literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(Suppl 3):44–58CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pavlopoulos DA, Badras LS, Georgiou CS et al (2007) Hemiarthroplasty for three- and four- part displaced fractures of the proximal humerus in patients over 65 years of age. Acta Orthop Belg 73:306–314PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Plecko M, Kraus A (2005) Internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures using the locking proximal humerus plate. Oper Orthop Traumatol 17:25–50CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Popescu A et al (2009) Internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures using the T2-proximal humeral nail. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129(9):1239–1244CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rajasekhar C, Ray PS, Bhamra MS (2001) Fixation of proximal humeral fractures with the Polarus nail. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 10:7–10CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rasmussen S, Hvass I, Dalsgaard J et al (1992) Displaced proximal humeral fractures: results of conservative treatment. Injury 23:41–43CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sosef N, Stobbe I, Hogervorst M et al (2007) The Polarus intramedullary nail for proximal humeral fractures: outcome in 28 patients followed for 1 year. Acta Orthop 78:436–441CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Stedtfeld HW, Mittlmeier T (2007) Fixation of proximal humeral fractures with an intramedullary nail: tips and tricks. Eur J Trauma Emergency Surg 33:367–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vallier HA (2007) Treatment of proximal humerus fractures. J Orthop Trauma 21:469–476CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wijgman AJ, Roolker W, Patt TW et al (2002) Open reduction and internal fixation of three and four-part fractures of the proximal part of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A:1919–1925PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Young TB, Wallace WA (1985) Conservative treatment of fractures and fracture-dislocations of the upper end of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 67:373–377PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zyto K (1998) Non-operative treatment of comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly patients. Injury 29:349–352CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nico Sosef
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • Roderick van Leerdam
    • 1
  • Pieter Ott
    • 2
  • Sven Meylaerts
    • 1
  • Steven Rhemrev
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryMedical Center HaaglandenThe HagueThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyMedical Center HaaglandenThe HagueThe Netherlands
  3. 3.The HagueThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations