Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

, Volume 130, Issue 10, pp 1251–1256 | Cite as

The threat of misdiagnosis of primary osteosarcoma over the age of 60: a series of seven cases and review of the literature

  • Patrick Sadoghi
  • Andreas Leithner
  • Heimo Clar
  • Mathias Glehr
  • Christine Wibmer
  • Koppany Bodo
  • Franz Quehenberger
  • Reinhard Windhager
Orthopaedic Surgery

Abstract

Background

Osteosarcoma is the most common, non-haematopoietic, primary malignant bone tumour with an incidence of 0.3–0.5 per 100,000. There is some discrepancy in literature concerning the peaks of incidence of osteosarcoma. Some describe only one peak which arises in adolescence, whilst others report a bimodal age distribution with a second peak over the age of 60. In this retrospective study, we evaluated osteosarcoma patients over age 60 treated at our department and reviewed previous studies from the literature.

Patients and methods

Sixty-four patients (40 male, 24 female) with a mean age of 29 years (from 7 to 82) were treated for primary osteosarcomas. At the time of diagnosis, seven patients (two male and five female) were over 60 years of age with a mean follow-up of 46 months after definite diagnosis.

Results

Three out of seven osteosarcomas were primarily radiologically or histologically misdiagnosed, but only one was mistreated with intramedullary nailing at a trauma centre. At last follow-up, two patients had died from the disease, three were alive with disease, and two had no evidence of osteosarcoma.

Conclusions

We did not find an increased incidence of primary osteosarcoma in the elderly; yet, older patients had a higher rate of misdiagnosis due to untypical radiological findings in combination with longer times from the onset of first symptoms to definite diagnosis. In cases of pathological fracture, it is essential to assess whether it is caused by mechanical stress or a primary or secondary tumour before leading into mistreatment, especially in older patients.

Keywords

Osteosarcoma Elderly Diagnosis Treatment Latency period 

References

  1. 1.
    Raymond AK, Ayala AG, Knuutila S (2003) Conventional osteosarcoma. In: Fletcher DM, Krishan Unni K, Mertens F (eds) World Health Organization classification of tumours. Pathology and genetics of tumours of soft tissue and bone. IARCPress International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Oxford University Press, Lyon, pp 264–270Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Campanacci M, Enneking WF (1999) High grade osteosarcomas. In: Bone and soft tissue tumours. Second, completely revised edition by Piccin Nuova Libraria S.p.A.; Padova, Italy and by Springer, New York, pp 464–468Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stark A, Kreicbergs A, Nilsonne U, Silverswärd C (1990) The age of osteosarcoma patients is increasing. An epidemiological study of osteosarcoma in Sweden 1971 to 1984. J Bone Joint Surg Br 72:89–93PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Unni KK (1996) Dahlin’s bone tumours: general aspects and data on 11, 087 cases, 5th edn. Lippencott–Raven, Philadelphia, pp 143–183Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dorfmann HA, Czerniak C (1997) Bone tumors. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 128–252Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brooks S, Starkie CM, Clarke NMP (1985) Osteosarcoma after the fourth decade. A clinico-pathological review. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 104:100–105CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Damron TA, Ward WG, Steward MA (2007) Osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, and ewing’s sarcoma. National cancer data base report. Clin Orthop Relat Res 459:40–47CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grimer RJ, Cannon SR, Taminiau AM et al (2003) Osteosarcoma over the age of forty. Eur J Cancer 39:157–163CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Okada K, Hasegawa T, Nishida J et al (2004) Osteosarcomas after the age of 50: a clinicopathologic study of 64 cases—an experience in northern Japan. Ann Surg Oncol 11:998–1004CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bielack S, Kempf-Bielack B, Delling G et al (2002) Prognostic factors in high-grade osteosarcoma of the extremities or trunk: an analysis of 1,702 patients treated on neoadjuvant cooperative osteosarcoma study group protocols. J Clin Oncol 20:776–790CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Crews KR, Liu T, Rodriguez-Galindo C et al (2004) High-dose methotrexate pharmacokinetics and outcome of children and young adults with osteosarcoma. Cancer 100:1724–1733CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang YM, Sutow WW, Romsdahl MM, Perez C (1979) Age-related pharmacokinetics of high-dose methotrexate in patients with osteosarcoma. Cancer Treat Rep 63:405–410PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bacci G, Bertoni F, Longhi A et al (2003) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-grade central osteosarcoma of the extremity. Histologic response to preoperative chemotherapy correlates with histologic subtype of the tumour. Cancer 97:3068–3075CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jeon DG, Lee SY, Cho WH, Song WS, Park JH (2006) Primary osteosarcoma in patients older than 40 years of age. J Korean Med Sci 21:715–718CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Huvos AG (1979) Osteogenic Sarcoma. In: Huvos AG (ed) Bone tumours: diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis, 2nd edn. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, pp 85–92Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Coventry MB, Dahlin DC (1957) Osteogenic sarcoma; a critical analysis of 430 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 39-A:741–758PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dahlin DC, Coventry MB (1967) Osteogenic sarcoma. A study of six hundred cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 49:101–110PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lee SY, Cho WH, Song WS, Park JH (2006) Different radiological findings with the same pathologic diagnosis due to different age in primary osteosarcoma. Acta Radiol 47:841–844CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Goslings JC, Gouma DJ (2008) What is a surgical complication? World J Surg 32:952CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Huvos AG (1986) Osteogenic sarcoma of bones and soft tissues in older persons. A clinicopathologic analysis of 117 patients older than 60 years. Cancer 57:1442–1449CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Li J, Thompson TD, Miller JW et al (2008) Cancer incidence among children and adolescents in the United States, 2001–2003. Pediatrics 121:e1470–e1477CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Foster L, Dall GF, Reid R et al (2007) Twentieth-century survival from osteosarcoma in childhood. Trends from 1933 to 2004. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:1234–1238CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bacci G, Longhi A, Versari M et al (2006) Prognostic factors for osteosarcoma of the extremity treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: 15-year experience in 789 patients treated at a single institution. Cancer 106:1154–1161CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Siegel RD, Ryan LM, Antman KH (1989) Osteosarcoma in adults. One institution’s experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res 240:261–269PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Longhi A, Errani C, Gonzales-Arabio D, Ferrari C, Mercuri M (2008) Osteosarcoma in patients older than 65 years. J Clin Oncol 26(33):5368–5373CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Leithner A, Bodo K, Scheipl S et al (2004) Two cases of calcaneal osteosarcomas presenting as aneurysmal bone cysts. Foot Ankle Int 25:815–818PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Scully SP, Temple HT, O’Keefe RJ, Mankin JH, Gebhardt M (1996) The surgical treatment of patients with osteosarcoma who sustain a pathologic fracture. Clin Orthop Relat Res 324:227–232CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sass M, Melcher I, Schaser KD, Strophal G, Mittlmeier T (2006) Management problems in the diagnostic work-up and treatment of pathological fracture of the proximal femur. Clinical case report. Unfallchirurg 109:251–255CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kumta SM, Chow TC, Griffith J, Li CK, Kew J, Leung PC (1999) Classifying the location of osteosarcoma with reference to the epiphyseal plate helps determine the optimal skeletal resection in limb salvage procedures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 199:327–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jacofsky DJ, Haidukewych GJ (2004) Management of pathologic fractures of the proximal femur state of the art. J Orthop Trauma 18:459–469CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hinton RY, Smith GS (1993) The association of age, race, and sex with the location of proximal femoral fractures in the elderly. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:752–759PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Abudu A, Sferopoulos NK, Tillman RM et al (1996) The surgical treatment and outcome of pathological fractures in localised osteosarcoma. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78:694–698PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patrick Sadoghi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Andreas Leithner
    • 1
  • Heimo Clar
    • 1
  • Mathias Glehr
    • 1
  • Christine Wibmer
    • 1
  • Koppany Bodo
    • 3
  • Franz Quehenberger
    • 4
  • Reinhard Windhager
    • 1
  1. 1.University Clinic of Orthopaedic SurgeryMedical University of GrazGrazAustria
  2. 2.Department of OrthopaedicsLudwig-Maximilians-University, Campus GrosshadernMunichGermany
  3. 3.Institute of PathologyMedical University of GrazGrazAustria
  4. 4.Institute of Medical Statistics, Informatics and DocumentationMedical University of GrazGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations