Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

, Volume 129, Issue 6, pp 719–727 | Cite as

The final straw: a qualitative study to explore patient decisions to undergo total hip arthroplasty

  • Sonia Dosanjh
  • Joel M. Matta
  • Mohit Bhandari
  • for the Anterior THA Research Collaborative (ATHAC)
Orthopaedic Surgery

Abstract

Background

Research focusing on the complex factors leading to patients decisions to replace their arthritic hip has been limited in favor of quantitative studies focusing on surgery outcomes. The purpose of this study was twofold: (1) to further explore patients experiences and their decision-making processes to undergo total hip arthroplasty and (2) to examine the factors that influenced patients decisions about the type of surgical procedure (approach, implants).

Methods

In 2005, 18 patients who were either scheduled for an upcoming total hip arthroplasty or had completed total hip arthroplasty participated in semi-structured interviews (N = 9) or a focus group (N = 9) regarding their decision to undergo hip arthroplasty. The canons and procedures of the grounded theory approach to qualitative research guided the coding and content analysis of the data derived from the focus group and semi-structured interviews.

Results

Three main categories or core concepts that emerged from the interviews and focus group were labeled (1) limitations, (2) psychological distress, and (3) perceptions about hip arthroplasty. These three categories yielded a total of ten subcategories. The participants in our study had lived with a hip arthritis to a point beyond which all decided to have hip replacement surgery (“the final straw”). Decisions to undergo surgery were based upon an increasing severity of limitations affecting their basic quality of daily living, relationships and psychological well-being. Participants acknowledged that their choice of surgeon, type of procedure and implants were largely based on their desire to choose a technique that minimized disruption to their muscles and led to a quick recovery. Having decided on the type of surgery, participants used colleagues, family, and the internet to identify the most qualified surgeons in their area.

Conclusion

Our study sheds further light on the complex process of patients “final straw” towards a total hip arthroplasty. Surgeons should be aware of patients personal processes in order to optimize their surgical experiences and outcomes. Future research should aim to resolve optimal approaches to arthroplasty in light of patients preferences for muscle-sparing and “minimally invasive” approaches.

Keywords

Qualitative study Total hip replacement Arthroplasty Perceptions Quality of life 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to those 18 participants who provided considerable insight to our interviews and focus group.

References

  1. 1.
    Lawrence RC, Helmick CG, Arnett FC, Deyo RA, Felson DT, Giannini EH, Heyse SP, Hirsch R, Hochberg MC, Hunder GG, Liang MH, Pillemer SR, Steen VD, Wolfe F (1998) Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and selected musculoskeletal disorders in the United States. Arthritis Rheum 41:778–799PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chang RW, Pellisier JM, Hazen GB (1996) A cost-effectiveness analysis of total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the hip. JAMA 275:858–865PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Roder C, Staub LP, Eggli S, Dietrich D, Busato A, Muller U (2007) Influence of preoperative functional status on outcome after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:11–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rooks DS, Huang J, Bierbaum BE, Bolus SA, Rubano J, Connolly CE, Alpert S, Iversen MD, Katz JN (2006) Effect of preoperative exercise on measures of functional status in men and women undergoing total hip and knee arthroplasty. Arthritis Rheum 55:700–708PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clark JP, Hudak PL, Hawker GA, Coyte PC, Mahomed NN, Kreder HJ, Wright JG (2004) The moving target: a qualitative study of elderly patients decision-making regarding total joint replacement surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:1366–1374PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hawker GA, Guan J, Croxford R, Coyte PC et al (2006) A prospective population-based study of the predictors of undergoing total joint arthroplasty. Arthritis Rheum 54:3212–3220PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hawker G, Wright JG, Bradley G, Coyte P (2004) Perceptions of, and willingness to consider, total joint arthroplasty in a population-based cohort of individuals with disabling hip and knee arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 51:635–641PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hirvonen J, Blom M, Tuominen U, Seitsalo S, Lehto M, Paavolainen P, Hietaniemi K, Rissanen P, Sintonen H (2006) Health-related quality of life in patients waiting for major joint replacement. A comparison between patients and population controls. Health Qual Life Outcomes 4:3PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fujita K, Makimoto K, Hotokebuchi T (2006) Qualitative study of osteoarthritis patients experience before and after total hip arthroplasty in Japan. Nurs Health Sci 8:81–87PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Marcinkowski K, Wong VG, Dignam D (2005) Getting back to the future: a grounded theory study of the patient perspective of total knee joint arthroplasty. Orthop Nurs 24:202–209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Corbin J, Strauss A (1990) Grounded theory research: procedures, canons and evaluative criteria. Qual Sociol 13:115–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Glasser B, Strauss A (1967) The discovery of grounded theory. Aldine, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Strauss A, Corbin J (1990) Basics of qualitative research. Sage Publications, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dahm DL, Jacofsky D, Lewallen DG (2004) Surgeons rarely discuss sexual activity with patients after THA: a survey of members of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428:237–240PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nordentoft T, Schou J, Carstensen J (2000) Changes in sexual behavior after orthopedic replacement of hip or knee in elderly males—a prospective study. Int J Impot Res 12:143–146PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stern SH, Fuchs MD, Ganz SB, Classi P, Sculco TP, Salvati EA (1991) Sexual function after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 69:228–235Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wiklund I, Romanus B (1991) A comparison of quality of life before and after arthroplasty in patients who had arthrosis of the hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:765–769PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dorr LD, Thomas D, Long WT, Polatin PB, Sirianni LE (2007) Psychologic reasons for patients preferring minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 458:94–100PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sonia Dosanjh
    • 1
  • Joel M. Matta
    • 1
  • Mohit Bhandari
    • 2
    • 3
  • for the Anterior THA Research Collaborative (ATHAC)
  1. 1.Hip and Pelvis Institutes, St. John’s HospitalSanta MonicaUSA
  2. 2.Division of Orthopaedic SurgeryMcMaster UniversityHamiltonUSA
  3. 3.Division of Orthopaedic SurgeryHamilton General HospitalHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations