Advertisement

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

, Volume 129, Issue 5, pp 617–624 | Cite as

Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with Miller-Galante II prosthesis: mid-term clinical and radiographic results

  • Esa KoskinenEmail author
  • Pekka Paavolainen
  • Antti Eskelinen
  • Arsi Harilainen
  • Jerker Sandelin
  • Pekka Ylinen
  • Kaj Tallroth
  • Ville Remes
Orthopaedic Surgery

Abstract

Aim

The purpose of our study was to evaluate retrospectively the mid-term results of the Miller-Galante II (Zimmer, Warsaw, USA) unicondylar knee arthoplasty (UKA).

Method

The study included 46 patients with medial UKAs. Mean follow-up time was 7.0 years (range 2.7–13.1 years).

Results

Survival rate of the prosthesis was 86.6% (95% CI 73.7–99.6) at 7 years. The mean clinical and functional Knee Society Scores had increased from 51 and 62 points preoperatively to 76 and 93 points (P < 0.001) postoperatively. Five of the 46 knees were revised because of excessive wear of the polyethylene liner, and three due to progression of the osteoarthritis in the lateral compartment of the knee.

Conclusion

Survival of this fixed-bearing UKA was not as good as previously reported and polyethylene wear seems to be a more common problem than previously assumed.

Keywords

Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty Miller-Galante II Medial Osteoarthritis Prosthesis 

Notes

Conflict of interest statement

No competing interests declared.

References

  1. 1.
    Ackroyd CE (2003) Medial compartment arthroplasty of the knee. Review article. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:937–942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Argenson J-NA, Chevrol-Benkeddache Y (2002) A modern unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with cement. A three to ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:2235–2239PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ashraf T, Newman JH, Evans R, Ackroyd CE (2002) Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 84:1126–1130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bartley RE, Tullberg SD, Robb WJIII, Sweeney HJ (1994) Polyethylene wear in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 299:18–24PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bengtson S, Knutson K (1991) The infected knee arthroplasty. A six-year follow-up of 357 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 62:301–311PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Berger RA, Nedeff DD, Barden RM, Sheinkop MM, Jacobs JJ, Rosenberg AG, Galante JO (1999) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clinical experience at 6- to 10-year followup. Clin Orthop 367:50–60PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Berger RA, Meneghini RM, Sheinkop MB, Della Valle CJ, Jacobs JJ, Rosenberg AG, Galante JO (2004) The progression of patellofemoral arthrosis after medial unicompartmental replacement: results at 11 to 15 years. Clin Orthop 428:92–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Callahan CM, Drake BG, Heck DA (1994) Patient outcomes following tricompartmental total knee replacement: a meta-analysis. JAMA 271:1349–1357PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Carlsson LV, Albrektsson BEJ, Regner LR (2006) Minimally invasive surgery vs conventional exposure using the Miller-Galante unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthoplasty 21:151–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Christensen NO (1991) Unicompartmental prosthesis for gonarthrosis. A nine-year series of 575 knees from a Swedish hospital. Clin Orthop 273:165–169PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Collier MB, Engh CA, Engh GA (2004) Shelf age of the polyethylene tibial component and outcome of unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 6:763–769Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Collier MB, Eickmann TH, Sukezaki F, McAuley JP, Engh GA (2006) Patient, implant, and alignment factors associated with revision of medial compartment unicondylar arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 6(Suppl 2):108–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Davies AP, Vince AS, Shepstone L, Donell ST, Glasgow MM (2002) The radiologic prevalence of patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop 402:206–212PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Deschamps G, Lapeyre B (1987) Rupture of anterior cruciate ligament: a frequently unrecognized cause of failure of unicompartmemntal knee prosthesis. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 73:544–551PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Deshmukh RV, Scott RD (2001) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Long-term results. Clin Orthop 392:272–278PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ewald FC (1992) The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop 248:9–12Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gioe TJ, Killeen KK, Hoeffel DP, Bert JM, Comfort TK, Scheltema K, Mehle S, Grimm K (2003) Analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in a community-based implant registry. Clin Orthop 416:111–119PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hagstedt B, Norman O, Olsson TH, Tjornstrand B (1980) Technical accuracy in high tibial osteotomy for gonarthrosis. Acta Orthop Scand 51:963–970PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Harilainen A, Sandelin J, Ylinen P, Vahvanen V (1993) Revision of the PCA unicompartmental knee. 52 arthrosis knees followed for 2–5 years. Acta Orthop Scand 64:428–430PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Harilainen A, Ylinen P, Sandelin J, Vahvanen V (1994) Survival analysis and predictors of failure in unicompartmental knee replacement using a PCA prosthesis. The Knee 1:201–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Harwin SF, Stein AJ, Stern RE, Kulick RG (1993) Heterotopic ossification following primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 8:113–116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Heck DA, Marmor L, Gibson A, Rougraff BT (1993) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A multicenter investigation with long-term follow-up evaluation. Clin Orthop 286:154–159PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hernigou P, Deschamps G (2002) Patellar impingement following unicompartmental arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 84:1132–1137Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Insall J, Aglietti P (1980) A five to seven-year follow-up of unicompartmental arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 62:1329–1337Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1992) Rationale of the knee society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop 248:13–14Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Iorio R, Healy WL (2003) Current concepts review. Unicompartmental arthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 85:1351–1364Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Koskinen E, Paavolainen P, Eskelinen A, Pulkkinen P, Remes V (2007) Unicondylar knee replacement for primary osteoarthritis—a prospective follow-up study of 1819 patients from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 78:128–135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kozinn SC, Scott RD (1989) Current concepts review unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 71:145–150Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Laurin CA, Dussault R, Levesque HP (1979) The tangential X-ray investigation of the patelleofmoral joint: X-ray technique. Diagnostic criteria and their interpretation. Clin Orthop 144:16–26PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Laurencin CT, Zelicof SB, Scott RD, Ewald FC (1991) Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in the same patient. A comparative study. Clin Orthop 273:151–156PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lewold S, Robertsson O, Knutson K, Lidgren L (1998) Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Outcome in 1, 135 cases from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty study. Acta Orthop Scand 5:469–474Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lieberman JR, Dorey F, Shekelle P, Schumacher L, Kilgus DJ, Thomas BJ, Finerman GA (1997) Outcome after total hip arthroplasty. Comparison of a traditional disease-specific and a quality-of-life measurement of outcome. J Arthroplasty 12:639–645PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    McAlindon TE, Snow S, Cooper C, Dieppe PA (1992) Radiographic pattern of osteoarthritis of the knee joint in the community: the importance of the patello-femoral joint. Ann Rheum Dis 51:844–849PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    McConnell S, Kolopack P, Davis AM (2001) The western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC): A review of its utility and measurement properties. Arthritis Care Res 45:453–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    McGovern TF, Ammeen DJ, Collier JP, Currier BH, Engh GA (2002) Rapid polyethylene failure of unicondylar tibial components sterilized with gamma irradiation in air and implanted after a long shelf life. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 6:901–906Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O’Connor JJ (1998) The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. A ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg 6:983–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Naudie D, Guerin J, Parker DA, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH (2004) Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the Miller-Galante prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 86:1931–1935Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Pennington DW, Swienckowski JJ, Lutes WB, Drake GN (2003) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients sixty years of age or younger. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 85:1968–1973Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Psychoyios V, Crawford RW, O’Connor JJ, Murray DW (1998) Wear of congruent bearings in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A retrieval study of 16 specimens. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 6:976–982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Robertsson O, Borgquist L, Knutson K, Lewold S, Lidgren L (1999) Use of unicompartmental instead of tricompartmental prosthesis for unicompartmental arthrosis in the knee is a cost-effective alternative. Acta Orthop Scand 70:170–175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Robertsson O, Knutson K, Lewold S, Lidgren L (2001) The Swedish knee arthroplasty register 1975–1997. An update with special emphasis on 41, 223 knees operated in 1988–1997. Acta Orthop Scand 72:503–513PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Soininen J, Paavolainen P, Gronblad M, Kaapa E () Validation study of a Finnish version of the Western Ontario and McMasters University osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) with correlation to Harris Hip Score (HHS) in 30 patients with total hip arthroplasty (THA) and American Knee Society Score (AKSS) in 37 patients with total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Hip Int (submitted)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Soohoo NF, Sharifi H, Kominski G, Lieberman JR (2006) Cost-effectiveness analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty as an alternative to total knee arthroplasty for unicompartmental osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 88:1975–1982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Thornhill TS (1986) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 205:121–131PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Voss F, Sheinkop MB, Galante JO, Barden RM, Rosenberg AG (1995) Miller-Galante unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at 2- to 5-year follow-up evaluations. J Arthroplasty 10:764–771PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Esa Koskinen
    • 1
    • 4
    Email author
  • Pekka Paavolainen
    • 1
  • Antti Eskelinen
    • 2
  • Arsi Harilainen
    • 1
  • Jerker Sandelin
    • 1
  • Pekka Ylinen
    • 1
  • Kaj Tallroth
    • 1
  • Ville Remes
    • 3
  1. 1.ORTON Orthopedic Hospital, Invalid FoundationHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.Coxa Hospital for Joint ReplacementTampereFinland
  3. 3.Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Peijas HospitalHelsinki University Central HospitalHelsinkiFinland
  4. 4.PoriFinland

Personalised recommendations