Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

, Volume 125, Issue 6, pp 369–375

Results of vancomycin-impregnated cancellous bone grafting for infected tibial nonunion

Original Article

Abstract

Introduction

Bone grafting plays a critical role in promoting bone healing in infected nonunion, although recurrent infection is of concern. Cancellous bone grafting as an antibiotic delivery system has been reported as an effective method to combat infections. In this study, we report the clinical results of vancomycin-impregnated cancellous bone grafting for the treatment of infected tibial nonunion.

Materials and methods

Between January 1996 and March 2001, 18 patients with infected tibial nonunion treated with vancomycin-impregnated cancellous bone grafting were available for follow-up. According to the Cierny-Mader classification, all patients belonged to type IVA and IVB osteomyelitis. Adequate debridement, stabilization with external fixation, and staged vancomycin-impregnated cancellous bone grafting were used in all patients. Regular clinical and radiographic follow-ups were conducted.

Results

Infection control was obtained in all 18 patients with a 100% infection arrest rate. Bone union was achieved in 13 of 18 patients at an average of 5.8 months. Bone union was obtained subsequently in the remaining five patients after closed nailing in four, and plating and bone grafting in one patient. Radiographs showed good consolidation and hypertrophy of grafted bone at an average follow-up of 48 months.

Conclusion

We conclude that vancomycin-impregnated cancellous bone grafting is a safe method for the treatment of infected tibial nonunion.

Keywords

Vancomycin Bone grafting Infected nonunion Osteomyelitis Tibial fracture 

References

  1. 1.
    Brighton CT, Friedenberg ZB, Zemsky LM, Pollis RP (1975) Direct-current stimulation of nonunion and congenital pseudoarthrosis. Exploration of its clinical application. J Bone Joint Surg Am 57:368–377PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chan YS, Ueng WN, Wang CJ, Lee SS, Chao EK, Shih CH (1998) Management of small infected tibial defects with antibiotic-impregnated autogenic cancellous bone grafting. J Trauma 45:758–764PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chan YS, Ueng WN, Wang CJ, Lee SS, Chen CY, Shih CH (2000) Antibiotic-impregnated autogenic cancellous bone grafting is an effective and safe method for the management of small infected tibial defects: a comparison study. J Trauma 48:246–255PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cierny IIIG, Mader JT, Pennick JJ (1985) A clinical staging for adult osteomyelitis. Contemp Orthop 105:17–37Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Green SA (1991) Osteomyelitis. The Ilizarov perspective. Orthop Clin North Am 25:515–521Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Green SA, Jackson JM, Wall DM, Marinow H, Ishkanian J (1992) Management of segmental defect by the Ilizarov intercalary bone transport method. Clin Orthop 28:136–142Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hou SM, Liu TK (1992) Reconstruction of skeletal defects in the femur with two-strut free vascularized fibular grafts. J Trauma 33:840–845PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Klemm K (1988) Gentamicin-PMMA chain (Septopal chains) for the local antibiotic treatment of chronic osteomyelitis. Reconstr Surg Traumat 20:11–35PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Klemm K (1993) Antibiotic bead chains. Clin Orthop 295:63–76PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lavelle DG (2003) Delayed union and nonunion of fractures. In: Canale ST (ed) Campbell’s operative orthopaedics, 10th edn, vol 3. Mosby, St Louis, pp 3125–3127Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lindsey RW, Probe R, Miclau T, Alexander JW, Perren SM (1993) The effects of antibiotic-impregnated autogenic cancellous bone graft on bone healing. Clin Orthop 291:303–312PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    McLaren AC, Miniaci A (1986) In vivo study to determine the efficacy of cancellous bone graft as a delivery vehicle for antibiotics. Trans Soc Biomat 12:1–2Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Minami A, Kaneda K, Itoga H (1992) Treatment of infected segmental defect of long bone with vascularized bone transfer. J Reconstr Microsurg 8:75–82PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Patzakis MJ, Mazur K, Wilkins J, Sherman R, Holtom P (1993) Septopal beads and autogenous bone grafting for bone deficits in patients with chronic osteomyelitis. Clin Orthop 295:112–118PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Patzakis MJ, Scilaris TA, Chon J, Holtom P, Sherman R (1995) Results of bone grafting for infected tibial nonunion. Clin Orthop 315:192–198PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Petri WH (1984) Osteogenic activity of antibiotic-supplemented bone allografts in the guinea pig. Oral Maxillofac Surg 42:631–636Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Petty W, Spanier S, Shuster JJ, Silverthorne C (1985) The influence of skeletal implants on incidence of infection. Experiments in a canine model. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67:1236–1244Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ueng WN, Shih CH (1992) Management of infected tibial plate osteomyelitis using a staging system for infected fracture. J Formosan Med Assoc 91:531–537PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ueng WN, Shih CH (1994) Semiopen cancellous bone grafting. Clin Orthop 306:175–182.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Witsø E, Persen L, Løseth K, Benum P, Bergh K (2000) Cancellous bone as an antibiotic carrier. Acta Orthop Scand 71:80–84CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryChang Gung Memorial Hospital Kaohsiung Medical CenterKaohsiung HsienTaiwan, R.O.C
  2. 2.Department of PharmacyChang Gung Memorial Hospital Kaohsiung Medical CenterKaohsiung HsienTaiwan, R.O.C

Personalised recommendations