Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

, Volume 126, Issue 2, pp 105–110 | Cite as

Stabilisation of periprosthetic fractures with angular stable internal fixation: a report of 13 cases

  • M. J. Kääb
  • U. Stöckle
  • M. Schütz
  • J. Stefansky
  • C. Perka
  • N. P. Haas
Case Report


Introduction: Periprosthetic fractures of the femur present a challenging surgical problem. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the outcome of periprosthetic fractures stabilised with an angular stable, less invasive stabilisation system (LISS). Patients and methods: Thirteen patients (ten total hip-, two total knee-, one total hip- and knee-arthroplasty) with periprosthetic fractures were treated with the LISS internal fixator (in ten cases minimal invasive). Six patients had previous operations due to periprosthetic fractures. The average follow-up period was 20 months, follow-up rate 85%. Results: All fractures showed radiographic fracture healing without implant loosening. Except one patient, all patients had returned to their pre-operative activity level. No early post-operative complications were seen. There was one implant failure after 4 months and two cases of malunion. Conclusion: The cases showed the internal fixator to be effective for the stabilisation of periprosthetic fractures, even in cases of poor bone quality with good functional outcomes. The internal fixator, with the option of minimal invasive application, is the preferred method of osteosynthesis in periprosthetic fractures.


Periprosthetic fracture Internal fixator LISS Minimally invasive fracture stabilisation 


  1. 1.
    Adolphson P, Jonsson U, Kalen R (1987) Fractures of the ipsilateral femur after total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 106:353–357PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Althausen PL, Lee MA, Finemeier CG, Meehan JP, Rodrigo JJ (2003) Operative stabilization of supracondylar femur fractures above total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of four treatment methods. J Arthroplasty 18:834–839PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beals RK, Tower SS (1996) Periprosthetic fractures of the femur. An analysis of 93 fractures. Clin Orthop 327:238–246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen F, Mont MA, Bachner RS (1994) Management of ipsilateral supracondylar femur fractures following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 9:521–526PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chrockarell JR, Berry DJ, Lewallen DG (1999) Nonunion after periprosthetic femoral fracture associated with total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:1073–1079Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dennis DA (2001) Periprosthetic fractures following total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 50:379–389PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Duncan CP, Masri BA (1995) Fractures of the femur after hip replacement. Instr Course Lect 44:293–304PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Figgie MP, Goldberg VM, Figgie HE III, Sobel M (1990) The results of treatment of supracondylar fracture above total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 5:267–276PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Frigg R, Appenzeller A, Christensen R, Frenk A, Gilbert S, Schavan R (2001) The development of the distal femur less invasive stabilization system (LISS). Injury 32(Suppl 3):24–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Henry SL (1995) Management of supracondylar fractures proximal to total knee arthroplasty with the GSH supracondylar nail. Contemp Orthop 31:231–238PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hockertz T, Gruner A, Reilmann H (1999) Die Versorgung von periprothetischen Femurfrakturen bei liegender Kniegelenkprothese mit dem LIS-System. Unfallchirurg 102:811–814PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jacobs RR, Rahn BA, Perren SM (1981) Effects of plates on cortical bone perfusion. J Trauma 21:91–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Johansson JE, McBroom R, Barrington TW, Hunter GA (1981) Fracture of the ipsilateral femur in patients with total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 63:1435–1442PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kolb W, Guhlmann H, Friedel R, Nestmann H (2003) Das LISS-System als neues minimal-invasives winkelstabiles winkelstabiles Verfahren zur Versorgung periprothetischer Femurfrakturen. Zentralbl Chir 128:53–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kregor PJ, Stannard J, Zlowodzki M, Cole PA, Alonso J (2001) Distal femoral fracture fixation utilizing the less invasive stabilization system (LISS): the technique and early results. Injury 32(Suppl 3):32–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lewallen DG, Berry DJ (1998) Periprosthetic fracture of the femur after total hip arthroplasty: treatment and results to date. Instr Course Lect 47:243–249PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    MacDonald SJ, Paprosky WG, Jablonsky WS, Magnus RG (2001) Periprosthetic femoral fractures treated with a long-stem cementless component. J Arthroplasty 16:379–383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Merkel KD, Johnson EW Jr (1986) Supracondylar fracture of the femur after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68:29–43PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Moed BR, Kellam JF, Foster RJ, Tile M, Hansen ST Jr (1986) Immediate internal fixation of open fractures of the diaphysis of the forearm. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68:1008–1017PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mont MA, Maar DC (1994) Fractures of the ipsilateral femur after hip arthroplasty. A statistical analysis of outcome based on 487 patients. J Arthroplasty 9:511–519PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Park MS, LeeYK, Yang KH, Shin SJ (2003) Management of periprosthetic femoral fractures. J Arthroplasty 18:903–906PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Perren SM (1991) The concept of biological plating using the limited contact-dynamic compression plate (LC-DCP). Injury 22(Suppl 1):1–41 (AO/ASIF Scientific Supplement)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rand JA (1994) Supracondylar fracture of the femur associated with polyethylene wear after total knee arthroplasty. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg.Am 76:1389–1393PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ricci WM, Bellabarba C, Evanoff B, Herscovici D, Di Pasquale T, Sanders R (2001) Retrograde versus antegrade nailing of femoral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma 15:161–169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM (1988) Anterior femoral notching and ipsilateral supracondylar femur fracture in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 3:185–187PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rorabeck CH, Angliss RD, Lewis PL (1998) Fractures of the femur, tibia, and patella after total knee arthroplasty: decision making and principles of management. Instr Course Lect 47:449–458PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rorabeck CH, Taylor JW (1999) Periprosthetic fractures of the femur complicating total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 30:265–277PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schemitsch EH, Kowalski MJ, Swiontkowski MF, Senft D (1994) Cortical bone blood flow in reamed and unreamed locked intramedullary nailing: a fractured tibia model in sheep. J Orthop Trauma 8:373–382PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schütz M, Müller M, Krettek C, Höntzsch D, Regazzoni P, Ganz R, Haas N (2001) Minimally invasive fracture stabilization of distal femoral fractures with LISS: a prospective multicenter study. Results of a clinical study with special emphasis on difficult cases. Injury 32(Suppl 3):48–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Short WH, Hootnick DR, Murray DG (1981) Ipsilateral supracondylar femur fractures following knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 158:111–116PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Siegmeth A, Menth-Chiari W, Wozasek G, Vecsei V (1998) Die periprothetische Femurschaftfraktur. Indikationen und Ergebnisse bei 51 Patienten. Unfallchirurg 101:901–906PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wick M, Muller EJ, Muller EJ, Kutscha-Lissberg F, Hopf F, Muhr G (2004) Die operative Versorgung suprakondylärer Femurfrakturen bei liegender Knieendoprothese—less invasive stabilisation system (LISS) oder retrograder Marknagel? Probleme in der Anwendung minimal-invasiver Verfahren. Unfallchirurg 107:181–188PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. J. Kääb
    • 1
  • U. Stöckle
    • 1
  • M. Schütz
    • 1
  • J. Stefansky
    • 1
  • C. Perka
    • 1
  • N. P. Haas
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Musculosceletal SurgeryCharité Universitätsmedizin Berlin BerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations