Advertisement

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

, Volume 125, Issue 10, pp 713–720 | Cite as

Dynamic function of the fibula. Gait analysis evaluation of three different parts of the shank after fibulectomy: proximal, middle and distal

  • Murat Bozkurt
  • Güneş Yavuzer
  • Ergin Tönük
  • Behzat Kentel
Case Report

Abstract

The purpose of this case study was to investigate the dynamic features of fibular movement to gait pattern by analyzing the gait of individuals with three different parts of the fibula resected. Gait analyses revealed that proximal fibula resection impaired knee stability, whereas distal fibula resection disturbed ankle kinematics significantly. Except a mild secondary quadriceps weakness, middle fibula resection did not cause a significant biomechanical disturbance on gait.

Keywords

Fibular rotation Gait analysis Fibulectomy 

References

  1. 1.
    Ahl T, Dalen N, Lundberg A, Selvik G (1987) Mobility of the ankle mortise. Acta Orthop Scand 58:401–402PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson AF, Green NE (1991) Residual functional deficit after partial fibulectomy for bone graft. Clin Orthop 267:137–140PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Apkarian J, Naumann S, Cairns B (1989) A three-dimensional kinematic and dynamic model of the lower limb. J Biomech 22:143–155CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Babhulkar SS, Panda KC, Babhulkar S (1957) Ankle instability of the donor site following removal of vascularized fibula bone graft. J Bone Joint Surg 77-B:258–261Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barnett CH, Napier JR (1952) The axis of the rotation at the ankle joint in man. Its influence upon the form of the talus and the mobility of the fibula. J Anat 86:1PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bozkurt M, Yilmaz E, Atlihan D, Tekdemir I, Havitcioglu H, Gunal I (2003) Proximal tibiofibular joint—an anatomic study. Clin Orthop 403:136–140Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Close JR (1956) Some applications of the functional anatomy of the ankle joint. J Bone Joint Surg 38-A:761–781PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Curtis MJ, Michelson JD, Urquhart MW, Byank RP, Jinnah RH (1992) Tibiotalar contact and fibular malunion in ankle fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 63(3):326–329PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goh JC, Mech AM, Lee EH, Ang EJ, Bayon P, Pho RW (1992) Biomechanical study on the load-bearing characteristics of the fibula and the effects of fibular resection. Clin Orthop 279:223–228PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gore DR, Gardner GM, Sepic SB, Mollinger LA, Murray MP (1987) Function following partial fibulectomy. Clin Orthop 220:206–210PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kärrholm J, Hansson LI, Selvik G (1985) Mobility of the lateral malleolus. Acta Orthop Scand 56:479–483PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lambert KL (1971) The weight bearing function of the fibula. A strain gauge study. J Bone Joint Surg 53-A:507–513Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee EH, Goh JCH, Helm R, Pho RWH (1990) Donor site morbidity following resection of the fibula. J Bone Joint Surg 72-B:129–131Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lundberg A (1989) Kinematics of the ankle and foot—in vivo roentgen stereophotogrammetry. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 223:1–24Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Makin M (1965) Tibio-fibular relationships in paralysed limbs. J Bone Joint Surg 47B:500Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ogden JA (1974) The anatomy and function of the proximal tibiofibular joint. Clin Orthop 101:188–191Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pacelli LL, Gillard J, McLoughlin SW, Buehler MJ (2003) A biomechanical analysis of donor-site ankle instability following free fibular graft harvest. J Bone Joint Surg 85-A:597–603PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Perry J (1992) Gait analysis: normal and pathological function. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Scranton PE, McMaster JH, Kelly E (1976) Dynamic fibular function—a new concept. Clin Orthop 118:76–81PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shpitzer T, Neligan P, Boyd B, Gullane P, Gur E, Freeman J (1997) Leg morbidity and function following fibular free flap harvest. Ann Plast Surg 38:461–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Spivack B (1995) Evaluation and management of gait disorders. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Thompson C (1957) Congenital absence of the fibula. J Bone Joint Surg 39-A:1229PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Thordarson DB, Motamed S, Hedman T, Ebramzadeh E, Bakshian S (1997) The effect of fibular malreduction on contact pressures in an ankle fracture malunion model. J Bone Joint Surg 79-A:1809–1815Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wang Q, Whittle M, Cunnigham J, Mimeche C, Kenwright J (1996) Fibula and its ligaments in load transmission and ankle joint stability. Clin Orthop 330:261–270CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Weinert CR, McMaster JH, Ferguson RJ (1973) Dynamic function of the human fibula. Am J Anat 138:145–149CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Woodburne R (1957) Essentials of human anatomy. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Murat Bozkurt
    • 1
    • 4
  • Güneş Yavuzer
    • 2
  • Ergin Tönük
    • 3
  • Behzat Kentel
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology and A.B. Demet HospitalEmergency Aid and Traumatology HospitalAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationAnkara University Medical SchoolAnkaraTurkey
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringMiddle East Technical UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  4. 4.Tirebolu SokakYukariayrancı, AnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations