Skill dependence of radiation exposure for the orthopaedic surgeon during interlocking nailing of long-bone shaft fractures: a clinical study
- 222 Downloads
The objective of this clinical trial was to determine whether there is a skill dependence for the total amount of radiation exposure to orthopaedic surgeons caused by fluoroscopy during intramedullary fracture fixation.
Materials and methods
Surgical teams were assigned to either the ‘Senior group’ or the ‘Junior group’ according to their professional qualification and clinical appointment. Twenty-two long-bone shaft fractures were stabilized with intramedullary nails. The radiation exposure was measured at different body locations including fingers, trunk and head by means of thermoluminescent LiF:Mg,Cu,P detectors. The total time of fluoroscopy was registered for each operation.
Mean time of fluoroscopy per operation was 4.43 min for the ‘Senior group’ and 6.95 min for the ‘Junior group’. The surgeons’ hands were exposed to markedly higher doses (range 0–2.88 mSv ‘Senior group’; 0–11.94 mSv ‘Junior group’) than their trunk and head (range 0–0.27 mSv ‘Senior group’; 0–0.38 mSv ‘Junior group’). After analysis of variance, differences between both groups proved to be statistically significant for all fingers measured (p≤0.02) and for the total time of fluoroscopy (p=0.019).
Generally, the hands are at higher risk than are the trunk and the head, and this finding is independent of surgical skills. However, an additional hazard is created for the less experienced surgeon by a highly varying and poorly predictable exposure of the hands and time needed for fluoroscopy. Thus, the use of radiation is more consistent and standardized with a skilled surgeon.
KeywordsRadiation Fluoroscopy Thermoluminescent dosimetry Intramedullary fracture fixation Clinical competence
We thank C. Ulrich for his practical assistance during the project. No financial support was received. The study complies with the current laws of the country in which it was performed.
- 1.American College of Radiology (1992) Proceedings of the ACR/FDA workshop on fluoroscopy—strategies for improvement in performance, radiation safety and control. American College of RadiologyGoogle Scholar
- 5.Fill UA, Regulla DF (1998) Advanced LiF technology for the assessment of patient exposure in diagnostic radiology. Radiat Prot Dosim 80:225–229Google Scholar
- 7.Frankenberg D, Kelnhofer K, Bär K, Frankenberg-Schwager M (2002) Enhanced neoplastic transformation by mammography X-rays relative to 200 kVP X-rays. Indication for a strong dependence on photon energy of the RBEM for various endpoints. Radiat Res 157:208–213Google Scholar
- 9.Giachino AA, Cheng M (1980) Irradiation of the surgeon during pinning of femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 62:227–229Google Scholar
- 16.Müller LP, Suffner J, Wenda K, Mohr W, Rudig L (1996) Die Röntgenstrahlenbelastung der Hände der Operateure bei Marknagelosteosynthesen. Unfallchirurg 22:253–259Google Scholar
- 17.Nahrstedt U (1995) The GSF secondary standard dosimetry laboratory for photon and beta radiation. GSF-report 9Google Scholar
- 18.Piesch E, Burgkhardt B (1993) Thermoluminescence and personal dosimetry: potentials and limits. In: Oberhofer M, Scharmann A (eds) Techniques and management of personnel thermoluminescence dosimetry services. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, pp 125–129Google Scholar
- 21.Zha Z, Wang S, Shen W, Zhu J, Cai G (1993) Preparation and charcteristics of LiF:Mg, Cu, P thermoluminescent material. Radiat Prot Dosim 47:111–118Google Scholar