Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

, Volume 124, Issue 3, pp 161–165 | Cite as

Use of a synthetic bone void filler to augment screws in osteopenic ankle fracture fixation

  • Geir Stray Andreassen
  • Per Reidar HøinessEmail author
  • Inge Skraamm
  • Odd Granlund
  • Lars Engebretsen
Original Article



Sufficiently stable constructs may be difficult to obtain with ankle fractures in patients with severe osteopenic bone. Augmentation of the osteosynthesis with a new synthetic bone void filler may help to solve this problem, and it can improve the clinical outcome.

Materials and methods

A prospective, open-label study was performed in two surgical clinics in Norway. In 37 of 42 selected patients with Weber type B ankle fractures showing clinical and radiologic signs of osteopenic bone, at least one screw was found to be stripping during open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). All the stripped screws were augmented with the bone void filler, and tightness was assessed clinically afterwards. All patients were followed up for 2 years. Successful healing of the fracture after 3 months and absence of radiographic movement of the augmented screws were assessed relative to the plate and the bone. Safety was assessed by recording adverse events and abnormal haematology findings.


All 86 augmented screws were clinically tight after augmentation. After 3 months, all fractures healed, and 1 augmented and 1 non-augmented screw appeared to be radiographically loose. After 2 and 6 months, respectively, deep wound infections occurred in 2 patients (5%), necessitating antibiotic treatment, revision surgery and implant removal. After 2 years, all patients had resumed their normal daily activities, and none of the augmented screws showed signs of loosening.


Augmentation of bone screws with this new synthetic bone void filler was an effective means of gaining screw anchorage. Screw stabilisation with the new synthetic bone void filler proved to be safe and effective in the ORIF of ankle fractures in patients with osteopenic bone.


Ankle fracture Osteopenic bone Bone screw augmentation New bone cement 



We would like to thank Orthovita (Malvern, PA, USA), the manufacturer of Cortoss, for providing logistic and financial support for performing this study.


  1. 1.
    Ahl T, Dalèn N, Selvik G (1988) Mobilization after operation of ankle fractures: good results of early motion and weight bearing. Acta Orthop Scand 59:302–306PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ahuja S, Hunt C, Evans S, Davis PR (2002) Comparison of pull out strengths of pedicle screws using Cortoss and Palcos LV. Eur Spine J 11:S43Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bahr W (1992) Comparison of torque measurements between cortical screws and emergency replacement screws in the cadaver mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50:46–49PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bauer M, Bergström B, Hemborg A, Andegård J (1985) Malleolar fractures: nonoperative versus operative treatment: a controlled study. Clin Orthop 199:17–27PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bauer M, Bengnér U, Johnell O, Redlund-Johnell I (1987) Supination-eversion fractures of the ankle joint: changes in incidence over 30 years. Foot Ankle Int 8:26–28Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Beauchamp CG, Clay NR, Thexton PW (1983) Displaced ankle fractures in patients over 50 years of age. J Bone Joint Surg Br 65:329–332PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Belkoff SM, Mathis JM, Erbe EM, Fenton DC (2000) Biomechanical evaluation of a new bone cement for use in vertebroplasty. Spine 25:1061–1064CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dahl OE, Garvik LJ, Lyberg T (1994) Toxic effects of methylmethacrylate monomer on leukocytes and endothelial cells in vitro. Acta Orthop Scand 65:147–153PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Deramond H, Wright NT, Belkoff SM (1999) Temperature elevation caused by bone cement polymerization during vertebroplasty. Bone 25:17S-21SCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dogra AS (1999) Early mobilisation versus immobilisation of surgically treated ankle fractures: prospective randomised control trial. Injury 30:417–419CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Egol KA, Dolan R, Koval KJ (2000) Functional outcome of surgery for fractures of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82:246–249PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Enis JE, McCollough NC, Cooper JS (1974) Effects of methylmethacrylate in osteosynthesis. Clin Orthop 105:283–294PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Erbe EM, Pomrink GJ, Murphy JP (2000) A comparison of the mechanical properties of a new synthetic cortical bone void filler (Cortoss®/Orthovita) with those of polymethyl methacrylate [abstract]. Eur Spine J 9:288Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Erbe EM, Clineff TD, Gualtieri G (2001) Comparison of a new bisphenol-a-glycidyl dimethacrylate-based cortical bone void filler with polymethyl methacrylate. Eur Spine J 10:S147-S152CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fernandez GN (1988) Internal fixation of the oblique, osteoporotic fracture of the lateral malleolus. Injury 19:257–258PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Flynn JM, Rodriguez-del RF, Piza PA (2000) Closed ankle fractures in the diabetic patient. Foot Ankle Int 21:311–319PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Godsiff SP, Trakru S, Kefer G, Maniar RN, Flanagan JP, Tuite JD (1993) A comparative study of early motion and immediate plaster splintage after internal fixation of unstable fractures of the ankle. Injury 24:529–530PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Horowitz SM, Doty SB, Lane JM, Burstein AH (1993) Studies of the mechanism by which the mechanical failure of polymethylmethacrylate leads to bone resorption. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:802–813PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Høiness P, Stromsoe K (1999) Early complications of surgically managed ankle fractures related to the AO classification. A review of 118 ankle fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 119:276–279CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Høiness P, Stromsoe K (2000) The influence of the timing of surgery on soft tissue complications and hospital stay. A review of 84 closed ankle fractures. Ann Chir Gynaecol 89:6–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hviid K, Harager K, Schantz K (2000) Aftercare of malleolar fractures in Denmark. A questionnaire study. Ugeskr Laeger 162:2747–2750PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kannus P, Parkkari J, Niemi S, Palvanen M (1996) Epidemiology of osteoporotic ankle fractures in elderly persons in Finland [brief communications]. Ann Intern Med 125:975–978PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Karlsson J, Brandsson S, Moller M (2000) Ankle fractures. In: Management of fractures in severely osteoporotic bone. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 309–317Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kleeman BC, Takeuchi T, Gerhart TN, Hayes WC (1992) Holding power and reinforcement of cancellous screws in human bone. Clin Orthop 284:260–266PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lindsjö U (1985) Operative treatment of ankle fracture-dislocations: a follow-up study of 306/321 consecutive cases. Clin Orthop 199:28–38PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Litchfield JC (1987) The treatment of unstable fractures of the ankle in the elderly. Injury 18:128–132PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mermelstein LE, Chow LC, Friedman C, Crisco JJ (1996) The reinforcement of cancellous bone screws with calcium phosphate cement. J Orthop Trauma 10:15–20CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mizel MS, Temple HT, Michelson JD, Alvarez RG, Clanton TO, Frey CC, et al (1998) Thromboembolism after foot and ankle surgery: a multicenter study. Clin Orthop 348:180–185PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Moore DC, Frankenburg EP, Goulet JA, Goldstein SA (1997) Hip screw augmentation with an in situ-setting calcium phosphate cement: an in vitro biomechanical analysis. J Orthop Trauma 11:577–583CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nordsletten L, Madsen JE (2000) Determinants for consolidation or deficient fracture healing. In: Management of fractures in severely osteoporotic bone. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 101–110Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pfeifer BA, Krag MH, Johnson C (1994) Repair of failed transpedicle screw fixation: a biomechanical study comparing polymethylmethacrylate, milled bone, and matchstick bone reconstruction. Spine 19:350–353PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Polly DW Jr, Orchowski JR, Ellenbogen RG (1998) Revision pedicle screws: bigger, longer shims—what is best? Spine 12:1374–1379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rüedi TP, Murphy WM (2000) AO principles of fracture management. Thieme Medical Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Stürup J, Nimb L, Kramhoft M, Jensen JS (1994) Effects of polymerization heat and monomers from acrylic cement on canine bone. Acta Orthop Scand 65:20–23PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Szpalski M, Gunzburg R (2002) Prevention of hip lag screw cut-out in osteoporotic patients. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 60:84–88Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Szpalski M, Gunzburg R, Hayez J-P, Passuti N (2000) Renforcement de la fixation de vis à hanche avec un nouveau biomatériau composite (Cortoss®) dans les fractures pertrochantériennes. Rev Chir Orthop 88:2S62Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Trafton PG, Cole PE, DiGiovanni CW (1998) Malleolar fractures: Open reduction internal fixation. In: Wiss D (ed) Master techniques in orthopaedic surgery. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 485–504Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tropp H, Norlin R (1995) Ankle performance after ankle fracture: a randomized study of early mobilization. Foot Ankle Int 16:79–83PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wittenberg RH, Lee K-Y, Shea M, White AA, Hayes WC (1993) Effect of screw diameter, insertion technique, and bone cement augmentation of pedicular screw fixation strength. Clin Orthop 296:278–287PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wuisman PI, Van Dijk M, Staal H, Van Royen BJ (2000) Augmentation of (pedicle) screws with calcium apatite cement in patients with severe progressive osteoporotic spinal deformities: an innovative technique. Eur Spine J 9:528–533CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Yerby SA, Toh E, McLain RF (1998) Revision of failed pedicle screws using hydroxyapatite cement. A biomechanical analysis. Spine 23:1657–1661CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Geir Stray Andreassen
    • 1
  • Per Reidar Høiness
    • 1
    Email author
  • Inge Skraamm
    • 2
  • Odd Granlund
    • 2
  • Lars Engebretsen
    • 1
  1. 1.Orthopaedic CentreUllevaal University HospitalOsloNorway
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryCentral Hospital in AkershusNordbyhagenNorway

Personalised recommendations