Advertisement

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

, Volume 123, Issue 9, pp 460–465 | Cite as

Harvesting hamstring tendons for ACL reconstruction influences postoperative hamstring muscle performance

  • Nobuo Adachi
  • Mitsuo Ochi
  • Yuji Uchio
  • Yasuo Sakai
  • Masakazu Kuriwaka
  • Atsushi Fujihara
Original Article

Abstract

Introduction

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using hamstring tendons has recently received attention because of less donor site morbidity. It has been reported that harvesting hamstring tendons has little effect on postoperative hamstring muscle performance based on the peak torque value of the hamstring strength. However, recent studies have clarified some adverse effects of harvesting hamstring tendons. There is still argument about the influences of harvesting hamstring tendons on postoperative hamstring muscle performance. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the postoperative hamstring muscle performance measured by various parameters after harvesting hamstring tendons for ACL reconstruction.

Patients and methods

We evaluated the postoperative hamstring muscle performance after harvesting hamstring tendons in 58 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction. We assessed peak torque value, total work, and peak torque angle in the isokinetic hamstring strength test and active knee flexion angle. We classified the patients into three groups according to the type of hamstring used for ACL reconstruction: 1) the autologous semitendinosus tendon (ST); 2) the autologous ST and the gracilis tendon, which were harvested from the ipsilateral knees; and 3) allogeneic fascia lata.

Results

This study clearly demonstrated that the peak torque value and total work in the patients in each group compared to preoperative normal knees were not statistically different; however, the more hamstring tendons were harvested, the more loss of active knee flexion angle was observed and the more the peak torque angle was shifted to a shallow angle, suggesting that the hamstring strength might be weaker at the deep flexion angle.

Conclusion

Physicians should recognize that the ACL reconstruction using autologous hamstring tendons is not appropriate for sportsmen or women who are required to flex their knees deeply or powerfully in their performance.

Keywords

Anterior cruciate ligament Semitendinosus tendon Gracilis tendon Muscle strength Rehabilitation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This experiment complies with the current laws of this country.

References

  1. 1.
    Butler DL, Noyes FR, Grood ES (1980) Ligamentous restraints to anterior-posterior drawer in the human knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 62:259–270PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carter TR, Edinger S (1999) Isokinetic evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: hamstring versus patella tendon. Arthroscopy 15:169–172PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cho KO (1975) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament by semitendinosus tenodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 57:608–612Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clancy WG, Nelson DA, Reider B, Narechania R (1982) ACL reconstruction using one third of the patellar ligament, augmented by extra-articular tendon transfers. J Bone Joint Surg Am 64:352–359PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fowler PJ, Regan WD (1987) The patient with symptomatic chronic anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency: results of minimal arthroscopic surgery and rehabilitation. Am J Sports Med 15:321–325PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fukubayashi T, Ikeda K, Niitsu M (1994) Changes in muscle volume after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using semitendinosus and gracilis tendons (in Japanese). Hiza (The Knee) 20:124–128Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Graf B, Uhr F (1990) Complications of intra-articular anterior cruciate reconstruction. Clin Sports Med 7:835–848Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Howe JG, Johnson RJ, Kaplan MJ, Fleming B, Jarvinen M (1991) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadriceps patellar tendon graft. Part I. Long-term follow up. Am J Sports Med 19:447–457PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Karlson JA, Steiner ME, Brown C, Johnston J (1994) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using gracilis and semitendinosus tendons. Comparison of through-the-condyle and over-the-top graft placements. Am J Sports Med 22:659–666PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lipscomb AB, Johnston RK, Snyder RB, Brothers JC (1979) Secondary reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament in athletes by using the semitendinosus tendon. Am J Sports Med 7:81–84PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lipscomb AB, Johnston RK, Snyder RB, Warburton MJ, Gilbert PP (1982) Evaluation of hamstring strength following use of semitendinosus and gracilis tendons to reconstruct the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 10:340–342PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Markolf KL, Mensch JS, Amstuts HC (1976) Stiffness and laxity of the knee: the contribution of the supporting structures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58:583–593PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nakajima R, Maruyama Y, Shitoto K, Yamauchi Y, Nakajima H (1996) Hamstring muscle strength after ACL reconstruction with the semitendinosus and gracilis muscles (in Japanese). Rinsho Sports Igaku (J Clinical Sports Med) 13:681–686Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Noyes FR, Mooar PA, Mathews DS, Butler DL (1983) The symptomatic anterior cruciate-deficient knee. Part I. The long-term functional disability in athletically active individuals. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65:154–162PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    O'Brien SJ, Warren RF, Pavlov H, PanarielloR, Wickiewicz TL (1991) Reconstruction of the chronically insufficient ACL with the central third of the patellar ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:278–286PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ohkoshi Y, Inoue C, Yamane S, Hashimoto T, Ishida R (1998) Changes in muscle strength properties caused by harvesting of autogenous semitendinosus tendon for reconstruction of contralateral anterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopy 14:580–584PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rosenberg TD, Franklin JL, Baldwin GN, Nelson KA (1992) Extensor mechanism function after patella tendon graft harvest for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 20:519–526PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sachs RA, Daniel DM, Stone ML, Garfein RF (1989) Patellofemoral problems after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 17:760–765PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Takai S, Woo SL, Livesay GA, Adams DJ, Fu FH (1993) Determination of the in situ loads on the human anterior cruciate ligament. J Orthop Res 11:686–695PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yasuda K, Tsujino J, Ohkoshi Y, Tanabe Y, Kaneda K (1995) Graft site morbidity with autogenous semitendinosus and gracilis tendons. Am J Sports Med 23:706–714PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nobuo Adachi
    • 1
  • Mitsuo Ochi
    • 1
  • Yuji Uchio
    • 2
  • Yasuo Sakai
    • 2
  • Masakazu Kuriwaka
    • 2
  • Atsushi Fujihara
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical SciencesHiroshima UniversityHiroshimaJapan
  2. 2.Department of OrthopaedicsShimane Medical UniversityIzumoJapan
  3. 3.Department of Physical TherapyShimane Medical UniversityIzumoJapan

Personalised recommendations