Advertisement

Acta Neuropathologica

, Volume 136, Issue 6, pp 973–974 | Cite as

The aftermath of boxing revisited: identifying chronic traumatic encephalopathy pathology in the original Corsellis boxer series

  • Marc H. Goldfinger
  • Helen Ling
  • Bension S. Tilley
  • Alan K. L. Liu
  • Karen Davey
  • Janice L. Holton
  • Tamas Revesz
  • Steve M. GentlemanEmail author
Open Access
Correspondence

In 1973, Corsellis and colleagues presented their findings of neuropathological changes in retired boxers in their seminal paper entitled ‘The Aftermath of Boxing’ [2]. The neuropathological changes associated with boxing, such as ventricular dilatation, cavum septum pellucidum and neurofibrillary tangle pathology highlighted by the authors would go on to set the groundwork for our understanding of chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) [2, 3, 4, 9, 10]. In 2016, under the guidance of NINDS/NIBIB, a consensus was reached amongst neuropathologists with expertise in neurodegenerative brain pathologies on the preliminary neuropathological diagnostic criteria for CTE, with a pathognomonic lesion of hyperphosphorylated tau in both neurons and astrocytes around small blood vessels at the base of cortical sulci [8]. Here, we sought to audit the neuropathological diagnosis of the boxers in the Corsellis series using the proposed preliminary criteria for CTE. Employing modern immunohistochemical techniques to tissue sections available from 14 of the original 15 cases, we screened for the deposition of hyperphosphorylated tau. The archival brain tissue from the Corsellis collection has been in fixative since the early 70s and sampled by many researchers over the past 45 years. This has limited the scope of our study and may affect our results in that we did not have access to all recommended regions outlined in the consensus criteria [8]. We therefore sampled multiple sites within the frontal and temporal cortices and systematically examined serial sections from these regions. The available brain regions and immunohistochemical staining applied are summarised in the supplementary tables. Antigen retrieval was performed to optimise staining in tissue fixed for prolonged periods.

Our findings indicate that seven of the 14 cases (mean age 69) fulfilled current CTE diagnostic criteria (Fig. 1). One of the seven CTE cases was found to have concomitant Alzheimer’s pathology, whilst the remaining six had CTE as the sole diagnosis. In the remaining cases, mixed pathologies were observed (see supplementary information for details). The presence of ARTAG pathology was identified in ten cases, including all seven CTE cases. Two cases were found to have no neuropathology (mean age 74.5) and two cases were found to have only ARTAG pathology (mean age 64). Further information on demographics, clinical data and boxing history of these subjects can be found in the supplementary data. It is important to note that we were unable to verify any boxing history for the two cases with no neuropathological abnormality.
Fig. 1

Tau (AT8) immunohistochemistry. a Pathognomonic tau lesions of CTE in case 7, a 62-year-old male, in the frontal cortex, with sulcal depth neuronal and astrocytic inclusions with a higher magnification (b) of the perivascular tau in the base of the affected sulcus. c CA4 region of the hippocampus in case 7, showing neurofibrillary tangles and proximal dendritic swellings, an example of tau supportive features. d A higher magnification of tau pathology in the dentate gyrus and CA4 of the hippocampus in case 7, another example of supportive tau features

The presence of additional tau pathologies is an interesting finding. A recent meta-analysis of 32 studies by Li and colleagues [6] demonstrated that repetitive head impact (RHI) significantly increases the relative risk of developing dementia and AD; however, recent publications indicate that TBI may not increase the risk of AD [12]. To further complicate the issue, TBI has also been shown to increase the risk for the onset other proteinopathies such as Lewy Body dementia [1], whilst the presence of multiple proteinopathies in individuals has been associated with advanced age [11]. ARTAG is a newly recognised histological entity with tau accumulation restricted to the glia rather than neurons, commonly observed in older individuals [5, 7]. The overlapping histological features of ARTAG and CTE and the frequent concomitant findings of their features in the same individual raise the question of these two histological entities being on a spectrum of the same disorder.

Our results indicate that not all individuals exposed to RHI from boxing or other high impact sports inevitably develop CTE pathology. RHI may not be sufficient on its own to lead to CTE. It is possible that environmental and genetic risk or protective factors may also play a role in the onset of CTE pathology.

Supplementary material

401_2018_1926_MOESM1_ESM.docx (5 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 5160 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Adams JW, Alvarez VE, Mez J, Huber BR, Tripodis Y, Xia W, Meng G, Kubilus CA, Cormier K, Kiernan PT et al (2018) Lewy body pathology and chronic traumatic encephalopathy associated with contact sports. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 77:757–768.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jnen/nly065 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Corsellis JA, Bruton CJ, Freeman-Browne D (1973) The aftermath of boxing. Psychol Med 3:270–303CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Geddes JF, Vowles GH, Nicoll JA, Revesz T (1999) Neuronal cytoskeletal changes are an early consequence of repetitive head injury. Acta Neuropathol 98:171–178CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hof PR, Knabe R, Bovier P, Bouras C (1991) Neuropathological observations in a case of autism presenting with self-injury behavior. Acta Neuropathol 82:321–326CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kovacs GG, Ferrer I, Grinberg LT, Alafuzoff I, Attems J, Budka H, Cairns NJ, Crary JF, Duyckaerts C, Ghetti B et al (2016) Aging-related tau astrogliopathy (ARTAG): harmonized evaluation strategy. Acta Neuropathol 131:87–102.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-015-1509-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Li Y, Li Y, Li X, Zhang S, Zhao J, Zhu X, Tian G (2017) Head injury as a risk factor for dementia and Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 32 observational studies. PLoS One 12:e0169650.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169650 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu AK, Goldfinger MH, Questari HE, Pearce RK, Gentleman SM (2016) ARTAG in the basal forebrain: widening the constellation of astrocytic tau pathology. Acta Neuropathol Commun 4:59.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-016-0330-7 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    McKee AC, Cairns NJ, Dickson DW, Folkerth RD, Keene CD, Litvan I, Perl DP, Stein TD, Vonsattel JP, Stewart W et al (2016) The first NINDS/NIBIB consensus meeting to define neuropathological criteria for the diagnosis of chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Acta Neuropathol 131:75–86.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-015-1515-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McKee AC, Cantu RC, Nowinski CJ, Hedley-Whyte ET, Gavett BE, Budson AE, Santini VE, Lee HS, Kubilus CA, Stern RA (2009) Chronic traumatic encephalopathy in athletes: progressive tauopathy after repetitive head injury. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 68:709–735.  https://doi.org/10.1097/NEN.0b013e3181a9d503 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    McKee AC, Stern RA, Nowinski CJ, Stein TD, Alvarez VE, Daneshvar DH, Lee HS, Wojtowicz SM, Hall G, Baugh CM et al (2013) The spectrum of disease in chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Brain 136:43–64.  https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/aws307 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Robinson JL, Lee EB, Xie SX, Rennert L, Suh E, Bredenberg C, Caswell C, Van Deerlin VM, Yan N, Yousef A et al (2018) Neurodegenerative disease concomitant proteinopathies are prevalent, age-related and APOE4-associated. Brain 141:2181–2193.  https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awy146 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Weiner MW, Crane PK, Montine TJ, Bennett DA, Veitch DP (2017) Traumatic brain injury may not increase the risk of Alzheimer disease. Neurology 89:1923–1925.  https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000004608 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marc H. Goldfinger
    • 1
  • Helen Ling
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Bension S. Tilley
    • 1
  • Alan K. L. Liu
    • 1
  • Karen Davey
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Janice L. Holton
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Tamas Revesz
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Steve M. Gentleman
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Division of Brain Sciences, Department of MedicineImperial College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Queen Square Brain Bank for Neurological Disorders, UCL Institute of NeurologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.Reta Lila Weston Institute for Neurological StudiesUCL Institute of NeurologyLondonUK
  4. 4.Department of Molecular Neuroscience, UCL Institute of NeurologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations