Acta Neuropathologica

, Volume 128, Issue 5, pp 615–627

Epigenetic dysregulation: a novel pathway of oncogenesis in pediatric brain tumors

  • Adam M. Fontebasso
  • Tenzin Gayden
  • Hamid Nikbakht
  • Michael Neirinck
  • Simon Papillon-Cavanagh
  • Jacek Majewski
  • Nada Jabado
Open Access
Review

Abstract

A remarkably large number of “epigenetic regulators” have been recently identified to be altered in cancers and a rapidly expanding body of literature points to “epigenetic addiction” (an aberrant epigenetic state to which a tumor is addicted) as a new previously unsuspected mechanism of oncogenesis. Although mutations are also found in canonical signaling pathway genes, we and others identified chromatin-associated proteins to be more commonly altered by somatic alterations than any other class of oncoprotein in several subgroups of childhood high-grade brain tumors. Furthermore, as these childhood malignancies carry fewer non-synonymous somatic mutations per case in contrast to most adult cancers, these mutations are likely drivers in these tumors. Herein, we will use as examples of this novel hallmark of oncogenesis high-grade astrocytomas, including glioblastoma, and a subgroup of embryonal tumors, embryonal tumor with multilayered rosettes (ETMR) to describe the novel molecular defects uncovered in these deadly tumors. We will further discuss evidence for their profound effects on the epigenome. The relative genetic simplicity of these tumors promises general insights into how mutations in the chromatin machinery modify downstream epigenetic signatures to drive transformation, and how to target this plastic genetic/epigenetic interface.

Current challenges in subgroups of high-grade pediatric brain tumors

According to the most recent reports published in 2014, one in every 285 children will be diagnosed with cancer before the age of 20 years [73]. Overall survival has improved substantially over the last three decades for specific cancer types, mainly childhood leukemia, partly based on better stratification of patients using molecular tools. In contrast, a subset of tumors remains incurable today and includes subgroups of brain tumors, a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality in the pediatric years. Several impediments to effective treatment exist and hamper the design and outcome of needed novel clinical trials. Diagnosis still relies mainly on standard pathology that characterizes tumors according to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification. Tumors are classified according to their presumed cell of origin and then are further divided into distinct histological grades, ranging from WHO grade I to WHO grade IV based on cytologic and histologic features (Fig. 1). Moreover, these tumors are often studied and treated as if they were analogous to adult tumors. However, pediatric brain tumors of most pathological types appear to harbor unique molecular alterations compared to these very same tumors occurring in the adult years, although under the microscope they are indistinguishable [18, 20, 50, 56, 63, 66]. Indeed, we and others have shown that they represent unique molecular entities and may require distinct therapeutic approaches [1, 2, 11, 18, 23, 26, 27, 30, 31, 50, 58, 69]. Supporting this is the predilection for pediatric and adult tumors to occur in different brain regions, with tumors arising in particular areas harboring distinct genetic alterations [63, 66, 75]. Last but not least, in the context of high-grade tumors, recent work enabled by next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies has begun to point us in the direction of the epigenome as a major driver of cancer development [63, 75]. Recent findings from several groups including ours point to the epigenome as a previously under-appreciated hallmark of oncogenesis that drives several groups of intractable high-grade pediatric brain tumors. These mutations directly affect histone genes, the core component of chromatin, or post-translational modifications affecting specific residues within the histone tail as well as enzymes mediating DNA methylation. Consequently, better stratification of patients based on tumor biology, improved identification of relevant therapeutic targets, and the design of experimental models to test compounds affecting specific genetic/molecular drivers are essential for therapeutic breakthroughs in these deadly diseases. Moreover, epigenetic alterations observed in high-grade pediatric brain tumors result in a previously unforeseen homogeneity within tumors and across tumors sharing the same mutational spectrum. This leads us to raise the concept of “epigenetic addiction” that will be further elaborated herein using pediatric high-grade astrocytomas and a subgroup of embryonal brain tumors as examples.
Fig. 1

Central nervous system cellular development and tumorigenesis. Graphic depiction showing differentiation of neural stem cells into neuronal and glial differentiation pathways and subsequent tumorigenesis from presumed cells of origin. CNS Central nervous system, PNET primitive neuroectodermal tumor, AT/RT atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor, ETMR embryonal tumor with multilayered rosettes, ETANTR embryonal tumor with abundant neuropil and true rosettes

High-grade pediatric and young adult astrocytomas: an epigenetic defect of the developing brain?

Astrocytomas fall under the larger classification of gliomas, which include ependymomas, oligodendrogliomas and mixed oligoastrocytomas that are more characteristic of the adult years [45]. They are the most common subgroup of brain tumor across age and are themselves comprised of four histological grades, I–II commonly termed low-grade tumors, and III-IV, termed as high-grade tumors [38, 45]. High-grade astrocytomas (HGAs) include grade IV astrocytoma (glioblastoma, GBM) and are particularly lethal and disabling brain neoplasms, with barely 10 % of children and young adults surviving 3 years after their diagnosis. Adult GBM occurring de novo (primary GBM) constitutes the large majority of HGA across the lifespan (90 % of all HGA (Fig. 2)). The Cancer Genome Atlas project (TCGA) revealed adult HGA to be highly heterogeneous with numerous mutations and copy number changes within tumors and across tumors sharing similar gene expression profiles [8, 12, 52, 72]. However, in younger patients where a stepwise disease is often identified and leads to secondary GBM, this consortium identified the crucial role for IDH metabolic pathways in the genesis of the tumors [7, 12, 52, 54, 72, 78] (Fig. 2). Indeed, recurrent somatic IDH1 and 2 mutations are found in the vast majority of grade II and III young adult gliomas and secondary GBM [54, 78]. These mutations are extremely rarely present in primary de novo GBM [54, 78] and when they do arise, patients are usually young adults aged <25 years [57]). These gain-of-function, heterozygous mutations are initiating events [54, 72, 74] and are associated with two mutually exclusive genetic alterations, TP53 mutations and 1p19q co-deletions [6, 53] that, respectively, characterize astrocytic and oligodendroglial IDH-mutant gliomas. IDH mutations induce the production of high quantities of 2-hydroxyglutarate [15]. This onco-metabolite affects chromatin structure through alteration of histone post-translational modifications and global DNA methylation. It competitively inhibits TET-mediated DNA demethylation, resulting in DNA hypermethylation and the glioma-CpG island methylator phenotype (G-CIMP) [52, 68] and impairs histone demethylases [46]. Most strikingly, in children, studies by our group and others have uncovered recurrent mutations directly affecting histone 3 variants at critical residues in pediatric HGA [63, 75]. These studies were the first to identify mutations in regulatory histones to be directly associated with human disease. These mutations were observed in histone 3 genes encoding both non-canonical histone (H3.3) and canonical (H3.1) variants. Interestingly, analogous p.Lys27 Met (K27M) mutations were observed in both of these two variants, with mutually exclusive p.Gly34Arg/Val (G34R/V) seen only in H3.3 thus far [63, 75]. These mutations are the pediatric counterpart of the recurrent IDH mutations [54, 78], with which they are also mutually exclusive. Similar to IDH, they require association with additional mutations in a specific set of genes that will differ based on the mutated histone variant, age of the patient and the brain location to give rise to HGAs in different anatomic compartments [37, 66]. Importantly, mutations leading to aberrant histone post-translational modifications of two H3 marks, Lysine (K) 27 and K36 appear to be central to the biology of high-grade gliomas in two different neuroanatomical compartments. Mutations affecting H3K27 methylation seem specific to tumors of the midline, encompassing brain regions such as the thalamus, the brainstem (pons), spinal cord and cerebellum. Conversely, mutations affecting H3K36 methylation are prevalent in tumors of the cerebral hemispheres and the genes responsible for these alterations, their accompanying partner mutations, as well as what is known of the downstream effects will be discussed herein.
Fig. 2

Molecular alterations identified in gliomas across the lifespan. Representation of molecular alterations observed in World Health Organization (WHO) grade I–IV astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas across the age spectrum. Alterations highlighted in red text are shown to have an epigenetic/chromatin remodeling role. GBM Glioblastoma, DIPG diffuse intronsic pontine glioma

Defects in H3K27 at the core of midline and hindbrain tumorigenesis

NGS studies have uncovered a prevalence of H3.3 and H3.1 K27M mutations in HGA tumors arising in regions along the neuroanatomical midline and hindbrain [37, 63, 66, 75]. These include diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG, HGA occurring in the pons), cerebellar, spinal and thalamic HGA, which are notoriously difficult areas for surgical resection and stereotactic biopsy. Recently, four concurrent studies helped further shape the genomic landscape of midline HGA [9, 19, 67, 76]. K27M mutations arising in genes encoding the canonical histone H3.1 (HIST1H3B or HIST1H3C) account for ~20 % of DIPG, and in a dataset of 40 midline HGA tumors, K27M mutations across H3.3 and H3.1 were present in 93 % of tumors in the midline compartment [19, 75]. H3.1 K27M mutations affect younger children (mean age of 3–5 years) and occur exclusively in the brainstem in conjunction with recurrent gain-of-function somatic mutations in the activin A receptor, type I (ACVR1). The mutated amino acid residues in ACVR1, which encodes a serine threonine kinase, ALK2, have previously been reported as germline mutations causing fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP), an inherited musculoskeletal disease [64]. They result in ligand-independent activation of the kinase leading to increase of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling and increased phospho-SMAD1/5/8 production in tissues [9, 19, 67, 76]. The lack of reported CNS tumor development in FOP patients or Acvr1/Alk2 mouse models suggests that aberrant activation of this pathway is not sufficient for tumorigenesis [22]. ACVR1 mutations may act in concert with H3 K27M mutations and other associated alterations identified in the PI3K pathway to induce tumorigenesis [19]. Interestingly, in rare cases, somatic-activating ACVR1 mutations are identified without association with H3 K27M mutations [76], inferring their importance in tumor formation, even though their exact role remains unknown. K27M in H3.3 occurs mainly in association with somatic loss-of-function genetic TP53 alterations [19, 63]. They represent the vast majority of pediatric midline HGA in the thalamus (80 %), cerebellum and spine (most tumors) or the pons (60 %) (Fig. 3). The recently uncovered hotspot mutations in the fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1), leading to hyperactivity along the MAPK axis identified in PA, are also identified in a rare subset of pediatric HGA of the thalamus and notably seem invariably associated with H3.3 K27M mutations [35]. In addition, DIPGs and HGA from other sites have previously been associated with activation of PDGFRA through genomic amplification or activating mutations [55, 79]. The gain-of-function alterations in these three growth factor receptors, ACVR1, FGFR1 and PDGFRA, associate with H3 K27M variants in midline HGA and are not seen concurrently. ACVR1 and FGFR1 mutations are mutually exclusive with TP53 alterations and occur in specific locations within the midline of the brain (Fig. 3) [19]. K27M mutations appear to correlate with poorer overall survival [37]. A glimpse of the complexity that lies in exploring H3K27 mutations is suggested by their inherent nature to alter global levels of H3K27me3, even though in the case of H3.3K27M mutations H3.3 is a minimal contributor to total histone H3 levels [43]. Independent studies have reported global loss in H3K27me3 associated with K27M mutations in HGA (Fig. 4) [10, 43, 71]. K27M appears to affect endogenous levels of H3K27me3 in human tumor samples, as well as decrease H3K27me3 levels when expressed ectopically (as H3.3 or H3.1 K27M) in a variety of cell types [10, 43]. Interestingly, in tissue samples, this decrease in H3K27me3 is not associated with differences in the levels of EZH2 expression [71]. This phenomenon was explored directly by Lewis and colleagues utilizing in vitro histone methyltransferase assays in the presence of synthesized H3K27M peptides that demonstrated that the K27M moiety was a potent inhibitor of EZH2 H3K27 tri- and di-methyltransferase activity [43]. Specific amino acid identities at the K27 position are critical to the ability of mutated H3K27 to block EZH2 activity, with methionine (M27) and isoleucine (I27) substitutions demonstrating potent inhibition of the enzyme, hypothesized to result from hydrophobic interactions with the EZH2 active site mediated by their side chains [43] (reviewed in [48]). Interestingly, although H3K27me3 levels are decreased in the presence of K27M mutations, Chan and colleagues demonstrate that there is a striking increase of H3K27me3 marks in association with sequences also marked by H3K4me3 [10]. These include so-called bivalent genes which are potentially poised for expression following removal of the repressive histone methyl mark at K27 [10]. One possible hypothesis is that these dually marked bivalent genes represent a gene signature specific to K27 mutant tumors. This is supported by their Gene Ontology (GO) analysis which suggests they represent genes with significance of cancer pathways as well as developmental pathways involved in pattern specification and morphogenesis [10]. Future experimentation and modeling of individual genes and pathways aberrantly regulated in K27M-mutant tumors are necessary to determine the ones important in specifying tumorigenesis in midline brain regions, where these mutations arise. Introducing K27M expression specifically to various regions in mice, or in cell models derived from these regions of the brain, such as cortical, brainstem or cerebellar astrocytes or neural stem cells will potentially allow further insight into its oncogenic effect. These studies have been performed in the context of low-grade glioma biology studies of KIAA1549-BRAF fusion, which arises most commonly in pilocytic astrocytoma tumors of the cerebellum [34]. The introduction of the KIAA1549-BRAF fusion gene was shown to specifically alter growth in cerebellar neural stem cells [36]. Such effects may not be limited to developing or immature astrocytes or stem cells, as lentiviral introduction of specific oncogenes has been shown to lead to re-programming and tumorigenesis of mature neurons and astrocytes [21]. Results demonstrating the global implication of K27M mutations and aberrant levels and distribution of H3K27me3 marks in pediatric brain tumors in specific regions further accentuate the core of this disease in the childhood years as epigenomic in nature (reviewed in [48, 65]). Of importance, H3K27 methylation alterations do not seem to be limited to tumors of the astrocytic lineage, with pediatric medulloblastoma tumors, which are neuronal in origin and occur in the cerebellum, demonstrating H3K27 post-translational modifications through increased EZH2 expression or loss-of-function mutations in KDM6A, which encodes a H3K27me3-specific demethylase [17, 51, 59]. Further to this, recent reports of posterior fossa ependymoma group A (PFA) tumors primarily affecting infants in the lateral cerebellum, demonstrate heavy involvement of epigenetic defects revolving around aberrantly regulated H3K27me3 rather than recurrent SNVs; a very unique finding among cancers sequenced to date [47]. The question then becomes: why do tumors in these midline regions harbor K27M mutations and aberrant H3K27 methylation so frequently? What genes are de-regulated by these alterations preferentially in cells of these areas that may contribute to tumorigenesis? Is aberrant H3K27 methylation, shown to be affected by H3.3 and H3.1 K27M mutations, central to tumorigenesis of these areas? If not what accompanying mutations/alterations are required in certain cases? Further experimentation and modeling of these mutations are absolutely essential to answering these questions.
Fig. 3

Molecular subgroups of pediatric high-grade gliomas show neuroanatomical preferences. Schematic representation of a sagittal view of the human brain depicting neuroanatomical areas with observed alterations discussed herein. Age of patients harboring these alterations is represented at the right

Defects affecting H3K36 define a unique set of tumors with a variety of clinical and biologic parameters

G34R/V mutations in H3F3A were identified in a subset of pediatric GBM defined by a unique set of clinical parameters, namely an adolescent/young adult age group, cortical brain location and in consistent association with concurrent mutations in TP53, similar to IDH mutant astrocytomas, and in ATRX (α-thalassemia/mental retardation syndrome-X-linked) [63], which encodes a subunit of a chromatin remodeling complex required for H3.3 incorporation at pericentric heterochromatin and telomeres [16, 42], in all cases initially identified [63]. In addition, G34R and G34V peptides were shown to decrease levels of H3K36me2/3 in mononucleosomes by mass spectrometric analyses (Fig. 4) [43]. In similar fashion to findings following ChIP-Seq analysis of H3K27me3 marks in K27M-mutant cells [10], Bjerke et al. [5] demonstrate re-distribution or differential binding of H3K36me3 across the genome in a cell line harboring an H3.3 G34V mutation. Further to this, specific upregulation of MYCN is observed in this cell line and is suggested to be mediated through G34-mutant H3K36me3 differential binding [5]. H3K36me3 is affected in tumors mutant for isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) indirectly through its newly acquired neomorphic enzyme activity enabling conversion of the normal product of oxidative decarboxylation of isocitrate, alpha-ketoglutarate (alpha-KG), into 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG) [15, 46]. This mutation, identified in a large proportion of secondary GBM and low-grade gliomas detailed above [54, 78], inhibits histone demethylases, including those acting on H3K36 [46], as well as alpha-KG-dependent dioxygenases [77], has also been shown to be sufficient for establishment of the G-CIMP [52, 68]. Initially, gene expression analysis demonstrated unique clustering of a group of adult GBM tumors defined by IDH1 mutation and proneural gene signatures with a better overall survival [72]. In addition, cohorts encompassing pediatric and adult GBM tumor samples demonstrated that IDH1-mutant GBMs formed a clinically and biologically distinct subgroup, with tumors largely occurring in cortical regions [66]. Recent conditional knock-in mouse models of IDH1 mutation recapitulated the aberrant histone marks present in overexpression models in cell culture [61]. Further exploration of whole-exome sequencing (WES) datasets of pediatric high-grade gliomas (HGGs) revealed a statistical enrichment of mutations in the H3K36 trimethyltransferase SETD2 in the pediatric subset compared to 543 non-cancer control exomes [20]. These mutations were associated with global decreases in H3K36me3 levels in HGGs harboring either missense or truncating mutations in SETD2, suggesting loss-of-function (Fig. 4) [20]. Loss-of-function mutations in SETD2 have been associated with renal cell carcinoma, breast cancer, and further confirmed in larger, independent TCGA GBM datasets [13, 14, 24, 49, 70]. Recently they have also been identified in acute leukemia associated with specific driver fusion genes [80]. In the context of pediatric HGGs this is particularly significant, as for pediatric HGGs located in the cerebral hemispheres, approximately half of tumors demonstrate defects in H3K36 methylation acquired by mutations either in H3F3A (G34R/V), IDH1 or SETD2 and seem to primarily affect adolescent/young adult patients [20, 66]. Future studies are needed to model H3K36 methylation defects as a specific pathway affected in cortical tumorigenesis where alterations affecting the H3K27 mark are rare.
Fig. 4

Mutations in H3 and the epigenetic machinery in pediatric high-grade gliomas. Graphic representation of histones containing H3.1, encoded by HIST1H3B or HIST1H3C, and H3.3, encoded by H3F3A, variants and mutations affecting these variants in midline and cortical pediatric high-grade gliomas. Effects of these mutations on histone post-translational modifications are indicated

A recent study identified recurrent H3.3 mutations in the vast majority of chondroblastoma and giant cell tumors of the bone, two tumors affecting soft tissues and younger patients (adolescents and young adults primarily) [3]. H3F3B K36M mutations were identified in 68/77 of chrondroblastoma samples and H3F3A G34W mutations were identified in 48/53 giant cell tumors of bone (GCT); in addition to cases with rare variants H3F3A K36M or G34L in chondroblastoma or GCT respectively [3]. No additional genetic alterations were identified to be associated with these H3.3 mutations that appeared to be the sole drivers of these tumors. To date, these are the only group of tumors other than pediatric HGA where a histone gene is recurrently affected in cancer. They illustrate that the residue and histone 3 isoform targeted is specific to age, tumor type and tumor location.

Mechanisms for telomere lengthening vary with age and tumor type

ATRX is a critical member of a multiprotein complex that includes DAXX and plays a role in regulating chromatin remodeling, nucleosome assembly, telomere maintenance and deposition of histone H3.3. The H3.3 chaperone HIRA loads H3.3 at active and repressed genes and at several transcription factor binding sites, while the ATRX–DAXX complex mediates H3.3 deposition in silent chromatin at telomeres, where the presence of H3.3 is correlated with the repression of telomeric RNA transcription, and near certain specific active genes [25]. Hypomorphic germline mutations in ATRX lead to the α-thalassemia/mental retardation X-linked syndrome. Conversely, complete loss-of-function mutations have recently been identified in cancers, including pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs), neuroblastoma and alpha-thalassemia myelodysplasia syndrome. We and others showed ATRX to be mutated in pediatric HGA [28, 63] and adult IDH-mutant astrocytomas [32, 44] and showed alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) to be associated with ATRX mutations [28, 63]. These mutations are mutually exclusive with TERT promoter mutations responsible for telomere elongation that seem to specify primary GBM and oligodendroglial IDH-CIC/FUBP1 mutants (Fig. 2). Interestingly, younger patients with HGA, mainly patients with DIPG did not harbor TERT promoter mutations possibly reflecting age and the effect of the cell of origin [9, 19, 76].

DNA methylation and its role in pediatric brain tumorigenesis

In addition to histone code alterations observed in the pediatric and young adult form of HGA, studies utilizing high-density methylation arrays have revealed striking associations between histone code alterations and global DNA methylation patterns. Sturm and colleagues identify six subgroups of GBM that vary in both clinical and mutational variables associated with individual methylation subgroups; three of which are delineated by mutations shown to affect the histone code, namely H3.3 K27M, H3.3 G34R/V and IDH1 R132-mutated tumors [66]. Additional subgroups are comprised largely of adult tumors with classical oncogenic alterations such as EGFR, PDGFRA amplification and mesenchymal profiles [66], suggesting that epigenomic dysregulation in the form of histone code alterations may be at the core of pediatric tumorigenesis specifically. Herein we have detailed the mutations and alterations leading to histone methylation defects in pediatric brain tumors, and have indicated that these are in addition, associated with novel DNA methylation patterns. Utilizing an adult glioma dataset, Noushmehr and colleagues [52] were able to subgroup tumors via DNA methylation profiling and identify a prominent G-CIMP subgroup defined by IDH1 mutation, which was later shown as detailed above, to be sufficient to create this phenotype [68]. Expanding global DNA methylation analyses to incorporate a significant pediatric subset, H3.3 K27M, H3.3 G34R/V and IDH1 mutant tumors were shown to specifically map three epigenetic subgroups of GBM that were comprised largely of pediatric and young adult tumors [66]. As a technology to classify pediatric brain tumors, DNA methylation profiling constitutes quite a robust method, with recent reports demonstrating this for not only gliomas, but also medulloblastoma, pilocytic astrocytoma, ependymoma and primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNETs) as well as embryonal tumors with multilayered rosettes (ETMRs) [4, 29, 39, 41, 47, 62]. Although in medulloblastoma, DNA methylation derived subgrouping corresponds very well with subgrouping performed via gene expression microarrays [29], for GBM this has proven more difficult, with only supervised analyses demonstrating unique gene expression associated with the epigenetic subgroups defined by H3.3 K27M and G34R/V [63]. Bender and colleagues demonstrate however that H3K27me3 and DNA hypomethylation areas may lie at the core of gene expression programs driven by K27M mutations [4]. Their data also argue for caution in isogenic cell lines expressing H3.3 mutations, as these may not recapitulate H3K27me3 and DNA methylation profiles present in human tumor tissue [4]. Recent multidimensional studies of DIPG tumors confirmed a global landscape of DNA hypomethylation seen in K27M-mutant DIPG tumors, and showed distinct subgrouping of tumors with activated Hedgehog (Hh) or N-Myc (MYCN) seen by corroborative transcriptomic and proteomic studies [60]. Differences in DNA methylation profiles of DIPG tumors associated with MYCN activation were first shown as delineating one of three epigenetic subgroups across 28 DIPG samples analyzed by methylation arrays [9]. MYCN alterations occurred independently of H3 K27M and ACVR1 mutations, although only a small sample size of MYCN-group tumors (n = 2) were included in methylation analysis necessitating future investigation of this MYCN subgroup [9]. Boot-strapping assessments of DNA methylation data of DIPG and other pediatric HGA tumors strongly suggest that K27M mutations across H3.3 and H3.1 govern distinct epigenomic profiles [19]. Subgroup-specific modeling of HGA and DIPG associated with these particular alterations presents a challenge and will undoubtedly represent a critical step forward in the study of this multifaceted group of diseases. Accurate recapitulation of the striking DNA methylation signatures we see robustly in tumors will form a driving force for progress in understanding the biology of individual subgroups of HGAs.

A recent example by our group in demonstrating the complex interplay between genomic alterations, DNA methylation and gene expression has resulted from the study of pediatric embryonal tumors (Fig. 1). While high-grade astrocytomas are more rare in children, embryonal brain tumors are very specific to the pediatric years and are rarely, if ever, seen in adults. These are aggressive high-grade malignant tumors and include medulloblastoma (neuronal high-grade neoplasms in the cerebellum), primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNETs), atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors (ATRT) and a newly described variant embryonal tumor with multilayered rosettes (ETMR) [40, 45]. Recent re-classification of many diverse histological entities into ETMRs prompted a view into the molecular characteristics underlying these aggressive tumors of the early pediatric years [40]. DNA methylation profiling revealed a very distinct global profile for a series of ETMRs when compared to a diverse set of gliomas, PNETs and other brain tumors [39]. RNA sequencing revealed a recurrent fusion between TTYH1 and the C19MC microRNA cluster, which is primate-specific [39]. When assessing significant genes up- or down-regulated in ETMRs specifically, a fetal-specific isoform of the de novo DNA methyltransferase DNMT3B (isoform 1b) was shown to be increased specifically in ETMRs, notably when assessed across a large dataset of a variety of tumors [39]. This isoform is known to be uniquely expressed in early post-conceptional fetal brain and may underlie the unique cellular differentiation of ETMR tumors. Specific members of the C19MC cluster were able to upregulate the 1b isoform associated with a decrease in retinoblastoma-like 2 (RBL2), a gene which regulates the expression of DNMT3B [39]. Taken together, these data point to a fusion between a gene and the C19MC cluster driving expression of the microRNA. This leads to subsequent downstream upregulation of a fetal isoform of a DNA methyltransferase, influencing the global epigenomic signature of ETMR tumors. Herein once more, data points to the epigenome as a potential driver for pediatric brain tumorigenesis. Defining the function of these unique methylation patterns across tumor subtypes will be important to understand how alterations in both the histone code and DNA methylation alter the genome in such a way as to directly mediate tumorigenesis, or act as a permissive environment for transformation.

“Epigenetic addiction” in pediatric high-grade brain tumors

Adult HGA is characterized by intra and inter-tumoral heterogeneity. Strikingly, our studies in pediatric HGA and ETMR unravel a previously unsuspected level of homogeneity within molecular subgroups of these tumors. Indeed, separate biopsies from H3 mutant HGA showed similar mutational profiles (including H3.3 K27M mutation) and close to identical global DNA methylation patterns, with heterogeneity seen largely for copy number variants in growth regulatory genes, such as PDGFRA amplification [19]. Moreover, recurrences following complete global resection of ETMR were identical for both these features in the cases where the primary and recurrent samples were available despite high-dose alkylating agents and/or radiation therapy [39]. These results mirror recent findings in IDH-mutant glioma where IDH mutation is present universally, independent of grade or recurrence, whereas non-IDH mutant gliomas showed strikingly different mutational patterns at recurrence including growth regulatory gene mutations such as BRAF V600E [33]. Although further experimentation focused on animal and cell modeling and inhibition of growth following blockade H3 K27M in mutant cells is required, these findings suggest that these tumors are “addicted” to specific forms of epigenetic dysregulation. To meet the criteria of oncogene addiction further experimentation is needed; however, if proven correct, this offers an unprecedented therapeutic opportunity unique to pediatric brain tumors contrary to the landscape of complex heterogeneity seen in epithelial and other cancers.

Summary

Recent work by our lab, other independent groups as well as large consortia including TCGA and the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) have shown epigenetic defects to be present in a large proportion of pediatric brain tumors. They call for the advent of molecular pathology, a needed change in the WHO classification to integrate data that takes molecular defects into account when classifying/stratifying a brain tumor. As patients continue to consent to participation in sequencing and molecular studies, the research community will be able to continue to explore the novel epigenetic mechanisms at play underlying their formation. Recent discoveries of histone variant mutations at critical residues have placed defects leading to H3 deposition and post-translational modifications at the center of pediatric high-grade gliomagenesis. Future work modeling the impact of these mutations, the potential need for additional hits or associated mutations and the careful interpretation of the interplay between genomic and epigenomic data may allow us to reconcile major mechanisms ongoing in either dimension. Examples such as ETMR tumors support an integrated approach to studying driving forces governing tumorigenesis. With such an approach, we hope to inform clinical trials with biomarker development and drug discovery fueled by molecular subgrouping of this deadly group of pediatric tumors. Uncovering the untapped biology in this young field in pediatric brain tumors may aid in laying the foundation we need to tackle these tumors clinically to improve outcome for patients.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was performed as part of the I-CHANGE consortium (International Childhood Astrocytoma iNntegrated Genomics and Epigenomics consortium) and supported by funding from Genome Canada, Genome Quebec, The Institute for Cancer Research of the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR) McGill University and the Montreal Children’s Hospital Foundation. N. Jabado is a member of the Penny Cole lab and the recipient of a Chercheur Clinicien Senior Award. J. Majewski holds a Canada Chair Tier 2. A. M. Fontebasso is supported by a studentship from the CIHR, as well as an award from the CIHR Systems Biology Training Program at McGill University. T. Gayden holds a fellowship from the Canadian Gene Cure Foundation.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. 1.
    Al-Halabi H, Nantel A, Klekner A, Guiot MC, Albrecht S, Hauser P, Garami M, Bognar L, Kavan P, Gerges N, Shirinian M, Roberge D, Muanza T, Jabado N (2011) Preponderance of sonic hedgehog pathway activation characterizes adult medulloblastoma. Acta Neuropathol 121(2):229–239. doi:10.1007/s00401-010-0780-0 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Becher OJ, Hambardzumyan D, Walker TR, Helmy K, Nazarian J, Albrecht S, Hiner RL, Gall S, Huse JT, Jabado N, MacDonald TJ, Holland EC (2010) Preclinical evaluation of radiation and perifosine in a genetically and histologically accurate model of brainstem glioma. Cancer Res 70(6):2548–2557. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-2503 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Behjati S, Tarpey PS, Presneau N, Scheipl S, Pillay N, Van Loo P, Wedge DC, Cooke SL, Gundem G, Davies H, Nik-Zainal S, Martin S, McLaren S, Goody V, Robinson B, Butler A, Teague JW, Halai D, Khatri B, Myklebost O, Baumhoer D, Jundt G, Hamoudi R, Tirabosco R, Amary MF, Futreal PA, Stratton MR, Campbell PJ, Flanagan AM (2013) Distinct H3F3A and H3F3B driver mutations define chondroblastoma and giant cell tumor of bone. Nat Genet 45(12):1479–1482. doi:10.1038/ng.2814 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bender S, Tang Y, Lindroth AM, Hovestadt V, Jones DT, Kool M, Zapatka M, Northcott PA, Sturm D, Wang W, Radlwimmer B, Hojfeldt JW, Truffaux N, Castel D, Schubert S, Ryzhova M, Seker-Cin H, Gronych J, Johann PD, Stark S, Meyer J, Milde T, Schuhmann M, Ebinger M, Monoranu CM, Ponnuswami A, Chen S, Jones C, Witt O, Collins VP, von Deimling A, Jabado N, Puget S, Grill J, Helin K, Korshunov A, Lichter P, Monje M, Plass C, Cho YJ, Pfister SM (2013) Reduced H3K27me3 and DNA hypomethylation are major drivers of gene expression in K27M mutant pediatric high-grade gliomas. Cancer Cell 24(5):660–672. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2013.10.006 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bjerke L, Mackay A, Nandhabalan M, Burford A, Jury A, Popov S, Bax DA, Carvalho D, Taylor KR, Vinci M, Bajrami I, McGonnell IM, Lord CJ, Reis RM, Hargrave D, Ashworth A, Workman P, Jones C (2013) Histone H3.3 mutations drive pediatric glioblastoma through upregulation of MYCN. Cancer Discov. doi:10.1158/2159-8290.CD-12-0426
  6. 6.
    Bourne TD, Schiff D (2010) Update on molecular findings, management and outcome in low-grade gliomas. Nat Rev Neurol 6(12):695–701. doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2010.159 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bredel M, Scholtens DM, Harsh GR, Bredel C, Chandler JP, Renfrow JJ, Yadav AK, Vogel H, Scheck AC, Tibshirani R, Sikic BI (2009) A network model of a cooperative genetic landscape in brain tumors. JAMA 302(3):261–275PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brennan CW, Verhaak RG, McKenna A, Campos B, Noushmehr H, Salama SR, Zheng S, Chakravarty D, Sanborn JZ, Berman SH, Beroukhim R, Bernard B, Wu CJ, Genovese G, Shmulevich I, Barnholtz-Sloan J, Zou L, Vegesna R, Shukla SA, Ciriello G, Yung WK, Zhang W, Sougnez C, Mikkelsen T, Aldape K, Bigner DD, Van Meir EG, Prados M, Sloan A, Black KL, Eschbacher J, Finocchiaro G, Friedman W, Andrews DW, Guha A, Iacocca M, O’Neill BP, Foltz G, Myers J, Weisenberger DJ, Penny R, Kucherlapati R, Perou CM, Hayes DN, Gibbs R, Marra M, Mills GB, Lander E, Spellman P, Wilson R, Sander C, Weinstein J, Meyerson M, Gabriel S, Laird PW, Haussler D, Getz G, Chin L (2013) The somatic genomic landscape of glioblastoma. Cell 155(2):462–477. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.09.034 PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Buczkowicz P, Hoeman C, Rakopoulos P, Pajovic S, Letourneau L, Dzamba M, Morrison A, Lewis P, Bouffet E, Bartels U, Zuccaro J, Agnihotri S, Ryall S, Barszczyk M, Chornenkyy Y, Bourgey M, Bourque G, Montpetit A, Cordero F, Castelo-Branco P, Mangerel J, Tabori U, Ho KC, Huang A, Taylor KR, Mackay A, Bendel AE, Nazarian J, Fangusaro JR, Karajannis MA, Zagzag D, Foreman NK, Donson A, Hegert JV, Smith A, Chan J, Lafay-Cousin L, Dunn S, Hukin J, Dunham C, Scheinemann K, Michaud J, Zelcer S, Ramsay D, Cain J, Brennan C, Souweidane MM, Jones C, Allis CD, Brudno M, Becher O, Hawkins C (2014) Genomic analysis of diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas identifies three molecular subgroups and recurrent activating ACVR1 mutations. Nat Genet 46(5):451–456. doi:10.1038/ng.2936 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chan KM, Fang D, Gan H, Hashizume R, Yu C, Schroeder M, Gupta N, Mueller S, James CD, Jenkins R, Sarkaria J, Zhang Z (2013) The histone H3.3K27M mutation in pediatric glioma reprograms H3K27 methylation and gene expression. Genes Dev 27(9):985–990. doi:10.1101/gad.217778.113 PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cin H, Meyer C, Herr R, Janzarik WG, Lambert S, Jones DT, Jacob K, Benner A, Witt H, Remke M, Bender S, Falkenstein F, Van Anh TN, Olbrich H, von Deimling A, Pekrun A, Kulozik AE, Gnekow A, Scheurlen W, Witt O, Omran H, Jabado N, Collins VP, Brummer T, Marschalek R, Lichter P, Korshunov A, Pfister SM (2011) Oncogenic FAM131B-BRAF fusion resulting from 7q34 deletion comprises an alternative mechanism of MAPK pathway activation in pilocytic astrocytoma. Acta Neuropathol 121(6):763–774. doi:10.1007/s00401-011-0817-z PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (2008) Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways. Nature 455(7216):1061–1068. doi:10.1038/nature07385 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (2013) Comprehensive molecular characterization of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Nature 499(7456):43–49. doi:10.1038/nature12222 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dalgliesh GL, Furge K, Greenman C, Chen L, Bignell G, Butler A, Davies H, Edkins S, Hardy C, Latimer C, Teague J, Andrews J, Barthorpe S, Beare D, Buck G, Campbell PJ, Forbes S, Jia M, Jones D, Knott H, Kok CY, Lau KW, Leroy C, Lin ML, McBride DJ, Maddison M, Maguire S, McLay K, Menzies A, Mironenko T, Mulderrig L, Mudie L, O’Meara S, Pleasance E, Rajasingham A, Shepherd R, Smith R, Stebbings L, Stephens P, Tang G, Tarpey PS, Turrell K, Dykema KJ, Khoo SK, Petillo D, Wondergem B, Anema J, Kahnoski RJ, Teh BT, Stratton MR, Futreal PA (2010) Systematic sequencing of renal carcinoma reveals inactivation of histone modifying genes. Nature 463(7279):360–363. doi:10.1038/nature08672 PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dang L, White DW, Gross S, Bennett BD, Bittinger MA, Driggers EM, Fantin VR, Jang HG, Jin S, Keenan MC, Marks KM, Prins RM, Ward PS, Yen KE, Liau LM, Rabinowitz JD, Cantley LC, Thompson CB, Vander Heiden MG, Su SM (2009) Cancer-associated IDH1 mutations produce 2-hydroxyglutarate. Nature 462(7274):739–744. doi:10.1038/nature08617 PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dhayalan A, Tamas R, Bock I, Tattermusch A, Dimitrova E, Kudithipudi S, Ragozin S, Jeltsch A (2011) The ATRX-ADD domain binds to H3 tail peptides and reads the combined methylation state of K4 and K9. Hum Mol Genet 20(11):2195–2203. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddr107 PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dubuc AM, Remke M, Korshunov A, Northcott PA, Zhan SH, Mendez-Lago M, Kool M, Jones DT, Unterberger A, Morrissy AS, Shih D, Peacock J, Ramaswamy V, Rolider A, Wang X, Witt H, Hielscher T, Hawkins C, Vibhakar R, Croul S, Rutka JT, Weiss WA, Jones SJ, Eberhart CG, Marra MA, Pfister SM, Taylor MD (2013) Aberrant patterns of H3K4 and H3K27 histone lysine methylation occur across subgroups in medulloblastoma. Acta Neuropathol 125(3):373–384. doi:10.1007/s00401-012-1070-9 PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Faury D, Nantel A, Dunn SE, Guiot MC, Haque T, Hauser P, Garami M, Bognar L, Hanzely Z, Liberski PP, Lopez-Aguilar E, Valera ET, Tone LG, Carret AS, Del Maestro RF, Gleave M, Montes JL, Pietsch T, Albrecht S, Jabado N (2007) Molecular profiling identifies prognostic subgroups of pediatric glioblastoma and shows increased YB-1 expression in tumors. J Clin Oncol 25(10):1196–1208. doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.07.8626 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fontebasso AM, Papillon-Cavanagh S, Schwartzentruber J, Nikbakht H, Gerges N, Fiset PO, Bechet D, Faury D, De Jay N, Ramkissoon LA, Corcoran A, Jones DT, Sturm D, Johann P, Tomita T, Goldman S, Nagib M, Bendel A, Goumnerova L, Bowers DC, Leonard JR, Rubin JB, Alden T, Browd S, Geyer JR, Leary S, Jallo G, Cohen K, Gupta N, Prados MD, Carret AS, Ellezam B, Crevier L, Klekner A, Bognar L, Hauser P, Garami M, Myseros J, Dong Z, Siegel PM, Malkin H, Ligon AH, Albrecht S, Pfister SM, Ligon KL, Majewski J, Jabado N, Kieran MW (2014) Recurrent somatic mutations in ACVR1 in pediatric midline high-grade astrocytoma. Nat Genet 46(5):462–466. doi:10.1038/ng.2950 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fontebasso AM, Schwartzentruber J, Khuong-Quang DA, Liu XY, Sturm D, Korshunov A, Jones DT, Witt H, Kool M, Albrecht S, Fleming A, Hadjadj D, Busche S, Lepage P, Montpetit A, Staffa A, Gerges N, Zakrzewska M, Zakrzewski K, Liberski PP, Hauser P, Garami M, Klekner A, Bognar L, Zadeh G, Faury D, Pfister SM, Jabado N, Majewski J (2013) Mutations in SETD2 and genes affecting histone H3K36 methylation target hemispheric high-grade gliomas. Acta Neuropathol 125(5):659–669. doi:10.1007/s00401-013-1095-8 PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Friedmann-Morvinski D, Bushong EA, Ke E, Soda Y, Marumoto T, Singer O, Ellisman MH, Verma IM (2012) Dedifferentiation of neurons and astrocytes by oncogenes can induce gliomas in mice. Science 338(6110):1080–1084. doi:10.1126/science.1226929 PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fukuda T, Scott G, Komatsu Y, Araya R, Kawano M, Ray MK, Yamada M, Mishina Y (2006) Generation of a mouse with conditionally activated signaling through the BMP receptor, ALK2. Genesis 44(4):159–167. doi:10.1002/dvg.20201 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gao Y, Fotovati A, Lee C, Wang M, Cote G, Guns E, Toyota B, Faury D, Jabado N, Dunn SE (2009) Inhibition of Y-box binding protein-1 slows the growth of glioblastoma multiforme and sensitizes to temozolomide independent O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase. Mol Cancer Ther 8(12):3276–3284. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-09-0478 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gerlinger M, Rowan AJ, Horswell S, Larkin J, Endesfelder D, Gronroos E, Martinez P, Matthews N, Stewart A, Tarpey P, Varela I, Phillimore B, Begum S, McDonald NQ, Butler A, Jones D, Raine K, Latimer C, Santos CR, Nohadani M, Eklund AC, Spencer-Dene B, Clark G, Pickering L, Stamp G, Gore M, Szallasi Z, Downward J, Futreal PA, Swanton C (2012) Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing. N Engl J Med 366(10):883–892. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1113205 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Goldberg AD, Banaszynski LA, Noh KM, Lewis PW, Elsaesser SJ, Stadler S, Dewell S, Law M, Guo X, Li X, Wen D, Chapgier A, DeKelver RC, Miller JC, Lee YL, Boydston EA, Holmes MC, Gregory PD, Greally JM, Rafii S, Yang C, Scambler PJ, Garrick D, Gibbons RJ, Higgs DR, Cristea IM, Urnov FD, Zheng D, Allis CD (2010) Distinct factors control histone variant H3.3 localization at specific genomic regions. Cell 140(5):678–691. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.003 PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Haque T, Faury D, Albrecht S, Lopez-Aguilar E, Hauser P, Garami M, Hanzely Z, Bognar L, Del Maestro RF, Atkinson J, Nantel A, Jabado N (2007) Gene expression profiling from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumors of pediatric glioblastoma. Clin Cancer Res 13(21):6284–6292. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0525 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hawkins C, Walker E, Mohamed N, Zhang C, Jacob K, Shirinian M, Alon N, Kahn D, Fried I, Scheinemann K, Tsangaris E, Dirks P, Tressler R, Bouffet E, Jabado N, Tabori U (2011) BRAF-KIAA1549 fusion predicts better clinical outcome in pediatric low-grade astrocytoma. Clin Cancer Res 17(14):4790–4798. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0034 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Heaphy CM, de Wilde RF, Jiao Y, Klein AP, Edil BH, Shi C, Bettegowda C, Rodriguez FJ, Eberhart CG, Hebbar S, Offerhaus GJ, McLendon R, Rasheed BA, He Y, Yan H, Bigner DD, Oba-Shinjo SM, Marie SK, Riggins GJ, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Hruban RH, Maitra A, Papadopoulos N, Meeker AK (2011) Altered telomeres in tumors with ATRX and DAXX mutations. Science 333(6041):425. doi:10.1126/science.1207313 PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hovestadt V, Remke M, Kool M, Pietsch T, Northcott PA, Fischer R, Cavalli FM, Ramaswamy V, Zapatka M, Reifenberger G, Rutkowski S, Schick M, Bewerunge-Hudler M, Korshunov A, Lichter P, Taylor MD, Pfister SM, Jones DT (2013) Robust molecular subgrouping and copy-number profiling of medulloblastoma from small amounts of archival tumour material using high-density DNA methylation arrays. Acta Neuropathol 125(6):913–916. doi:10.1007/s00401-013-1126-5 PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jacob K, Albrecht S, Sollier C, Faury D, Sader E, Montpetit A, Serre D, Hauser P, Garami M, Bognar L, Hanzely Z, Montes JL, Atkinson J, Farmer JP, Bouffet E, Hawkins C, Tabori U, Jabado N (2009) Duplication of 7q34 is specific to juvenile pilocytic astrocytomas and a hallmark of cerebellar and optic pathway tumours. Br J Cancer 101(4):722–733. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6605179 PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jacob K, Quang-Khuong DA, Jones DT, Witt H, Lambert S, Albrecht S, Witt O, Vezina C, Shirinian M, Faury D, Garami M, Hauser P, Klekner A, Bognar L, Farmer JP, Montes JL, Atkinson J, Hawkins C, Korshunov A, Collins VP, Pfister SM, Tabori U, Jabado N (2011) Genetic aberrations leading to MAPK pathway activation mediate oncogene-induced senescence in sporadic pilocytic astrocytomas. Clin Cancer Res 17(14):4650–4660. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0127 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Jiao Y, Killela PJ, Reitman ZJ, Rasheed AB, Heaphy CM, de Wilde RF, Rodriguez FJ, Rosemberg S, Oba-Shinjo SM, Marie SK, Bettegowda C, Agrawal N, Lipp E, Pirozzi C, Lopez G, He Y, Friedman H, Friedman AH, Riggins GJ, Holdhoff M, Burger P, McLendon R, Bigner DD, Vogelstein B, Meeker AK, Kinzler KW, Papadopoulos N, Diaz LA, Yan H (2012) Frequent ATRX, CIC, and FUBP1 mutations refine the classification of malignant gliomas. Oncotarget 3(7):709–722 588 [pii]PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Johnson BE, Mazor T, Hong C, Barnes M, Aihara K, McLean CY, Fouse SD, Yamamoto S, Ueda H, Tatsuno K, Asthana S, Jalbert LE, Nelson SJ, Bollen AW, Gustafson WC, Charron E, Weiss WA, Smirnov IV, Song JS, Olshen AB, Cha S, Zhao Y, Moore RA, Mungall AJ, Jones SJ, Hirst M, Marra MA, Saito N, Aburatani H, Mukasa A, Berger MS, Chang SM, Taylor BS, Costello JF (2014) Mutational analysis reveals the origin and therapy-driven evolution of recurrent glioma. Science 343(6167):189–193. doi:10.1126/science.1239947 PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Jones DT, Gronych J, Lichter P, Witt O, Pfister SM (2012) MAPK pathway activation in pilocytic astrocytoma. Cell Mol Life Sci 69(11):1799–1811. doi:10.1007/s00018-011-0898-9 PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Jones DT, Hutter B, Jager N, Korshunov A, Kool M, Warnatz HJ, Zichner T, Lambert SR, Ryzhova M, Quang DA, Fontebasso AM, Stutz AM, Hutter S, Zuckermann M, Sturm D, Gronych J, Lasitschka B, Schmidt S, Seker-Cin H, Witt H, Sultan M, Ralser M, Northcott PA, Hovestadt V, Bender S, Pfaff E, Stark S, Faury D, Schwartzentruber J, Majewski J, Weber UD, Zapatka M, Raeder B, Schlesner M, Worth CL, Bartholomae CC, von Kalle C, Imbusch CD, Radomski S, Lawerenz C, van Sluis P, Koster J, Volckmann R, Versteeg R, Lehrach H, Monoranu C, Winkler B, Unterberg A, Herold-Mende C, Milde T, Kulozik AE, Ebinger M, Schuhmann MU, Cho YJ, Pomeroy SL, von Deimling A, Witt O, Taylor MD, Wolf S, Karajannis MA, Eberhart CG, Scheurlen W, Hasselblatt M, Ligon KL, Kieran MW, Korbel JO, Yaspo ML, Brors B, Felsberg J, Reifenberger G, Collins VP, Jabado N, Eils R, Lichter P, Pfister SM (2013) Recurrent somatic alterations of FGFR1 and NTRK2 in pilocytic astrocytoma. Nat Genet 45(8):927–932. doi:10.1038/ng.2682 PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kaul A, Chen YH, Emnett RJ, Gianino SM, Gutmann DH (2013) Conditional KIAA1549: BRAF mice reveal brain region- and cell type-specific effects. Genesis 51(10):708–716. doi:10.1002/dvg.22415 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Khuong-Quang DA, Buczkowicz P, Rakopoulos P, Liu XY, Fontebasso AM, Bouffet E, Bartels U, Albrecht S, Schwartzentruber J, Letourneau L, Bourgey M, Bourque G, Montpetit A, Bourret G, Lepage P, Fleming A, Lichter P, Kool M, von Deimling A, Sturm D, Korshunov A, Faury D, Jones DT, Majewski J, Pfister SM, Jabado N, Hawkins C (2012) K27M mutation in histone H3.3 defines clinically and biologically distinct subgroups of pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas. Acta Neuropathol 124(3):439–447. doi:10.1007/s00401-012-0998-0 PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kieran MW, Walker D, Frappaz D, Prados M (2010) Brain tumors: from childhood through adolescence into adulthood. J Clin Oncol 28(32):4783–4789. doi:10.1200/JCO.2010.28.3481 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kleinman CL, Gerges N, Papillon-Cavanagh S, Sin-Chan P, Pramatarova A, Quang DA, Adoue V, Busche S, Caron M, Djambazian H, Bemmo A, Fontebasso AM, Spence T, Schwartzentruber J, Albrecht S, Hauser P, Garami M, Klekner A, Bognar L, Montes JL, Staffa A, Montpetit A, Berube P, Zakrzewska M, Zakrzewski K, Liberski PP, Dong Z, Siegel PM, Duchaine T, Perotti C, Fleming A, Faury D, Remke M, Gallo M, Dirks P, Taylor MD, Sladek R, Pastinen T, Chan JA, Huang A, Majewski J, Jabado N (2014) Fusion of TTYH1 with the C19MC microRNA cluster drives expression of a brain-specific DNMT3B isoform in the embryonal brain tumor ETMR. Nat Genet 46(1):39–44. doi:10.1038/ng.2849 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Korshunov A, Sturm D, Ryzhova M, Hovestadt V, Gessi M, Jones DT, Remke M, Northcott P, Perry A, Picard D, Rosenblum M, Antonelli M, Aronica E, Schuller U, Hasselblatt M, Woehrer A, Zheludkova O, Kumirova E, Puget S, Taylor MD, Giangaspero F, Peter Collins V, von Deimling A, Lichter P, Huang A, Pietsch T, Pfister SM, Kool M (2013) Embryonal tumor with abundant neuropil and true rosettes (ETANTR), ependymoblastoma, and medulloepithelioma share molecular similarity and comprise a single clinicopathological entity. Acta Neuropathol 128(2):279–289. doi:10.1007/s00401-013-1228-0 PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lambert SR, Witt H, Hovestadt V, Zucknick M, Kool M, Pearson DM, Korshunov A, Ryzhova M, Ichimura K, Jabado N, Fontebasso AM, Lichter P, Pfister SM, Collins VP, Jones DT (2013) Differential expression and methylation of brain developmental genes define location-specific subsets of pilocytic astrocytoma. Acta Neuropathol 126(2):291–301. doi:10.1007/s00401-013-1124-7 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lewis PW, Elsaesser SJ, Noh KM, Stadler SC, Allis CD (2010) Daxx is an H3.3-specific histone chaperone and cooperates with ATRX in replication-independent chromatin assembly at telomeres. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(32):14075–14080PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lewis PW, Muller MM, Koletsky MS, Cordero F, Lin S, Banaszynski LA, Garcia BA, Muir TW, Becher OJ, Allis CD (2013) Inhibition of PRC2 activity by a gain-of-function H3 mutation found in pediatric glioblastoma. Science 340(6134):857–861. doi:10.1126/science.1232245 PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Liu XY, Gerges N, Korshunov A, Sabha N, Khuong-Quang DA, Fontebasso AM, Fleming A, Hadjadj D, Schwartzentruber J, Majewski J, Dong Z, Siegel P, Albrecht S, Croul S, Jones DT, Kool M, Tonjes M, Reifenberger G, Faury D, Zadeh G, Pfister S, Jabado N (2012) Frequent ATRX mutations and loss of expression in adult diffuse astrocytic tumors carrying IDH1/IDH2 and TP53 mutations. Acta Neuropathol 124(5):615–625. doi:10.1007/s00401-012-1031-3 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK, Burger PC, Jouvet A, Scheithauer BW, Kleihues P (2007) The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol 114(2):97–109. doi:10.1007/s00401-007-0243-4 PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lu C, Ward PS, Kapoor GS, Rohle D, Turcan S, Abdel-Wahab O, Edwards CR, Khanin R, Figueroa ME, Melnick A, Wellen KE, O’Rourke DM, Berger SL, Chan TA, Levine RL, Mellinghoff IK, Thompson CB (2012) IDH mutation impairs histone demethylation and results in a block to cell differentiation. Nature 483(7390):474–478. doi:10.1038/nature10860 PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Mack SC, Witt H, Piro RM, Gu L, Zuyderduyn S, Stutz AM, Wang X, Gallo M, Garzia L, Zayne K, Zhang X, Ramaswamy V, Jager N, Jones DT, Sill M, Pugh TJ, Ryzhova M, Wani KM, Shih DJ, Head R, Remke M, Bailey SD, Zichner T, Faria CC, Barszczyk M, Stark S, Seker-Cin H, Hutter S, Johann P, Bender S, Hovestadt V, Tzaridis T, Dubuc AM, Northcott PA, Peacock J, Bertrand KC, Agnihotri S, Cavalli FM, Clarke I, Nethery-Brokx K, Creasy CL, Verma SK, Koster J, Wu X, Yao Y, Milde T, Sin-Chan P, Zuccaro J, Lau L, Pereira S, Castelo-Branco P, Hirst M, Marra MA, Roberts SS, Fults D, Massimi L, Cho YJ, Van Meter T, Grajkowska W, Lach B, Kulozik AE, von Deimling A, Witt O, Scherer SW, Fan X, Muraszko KM, Kool M, Pomeroy SL, Gupta N, Phillips J, Huang A, Tabori U, Hawkins C, Malkin D, Kongkham PN, Weiss WA, Jabado N, Rutka JT, Bouffet E, Korbel JO, Lupien M, Aldape KD, Bader GD, Eils R, Lichter P, Dirks PB, Pfister SM, Korshunov A, Taylor MD (2014) Epigenomic alterations define lethal CIMP-positive ependymomas of infancy. Nature 506(7489):445–450. doi:10.1038/nature13108 PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Maze I, Noh KM, Soshnev AA, Allis CD (2014) Every amino acid matters: essential contributions of histone variants to mammalian development and disease. Nat Rev Genet 15(4):259–271. doi:10.1038/nrg3673 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Newbold RF, Mokbel K (2010) Evidence for a tumour suppressor function of SETD2 in human breast cancer: a new hypothesis. Anticancer Res 30(9):3309–3311PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Northcott PA, Hielscher T, Dubuc A, Mack S, Shih D, Remke M, Al-Halabi H, Albrecht S, Jabado N, Eberhart CG, Grajkowska W, Weiss WA, Clifford SC, Bouffet E, Rutka JT, Korshunov A, Pfister S, Taylor MD (2011) Pediatric and adult sonic hedgehog medulloblastomas are clinically and molecularly distinct. Acta Neuropathol 122(2):231–240. doi:10.1007/s00401-011-0846-7 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Northcott PA, Nakahara Y, Wu X, Feuk L, Ellison DW, Croul S, Mack S, Kongkham PN, Peacock J, Dubuc A, Ra YS, Zilberberg K, McLeod J, Scherer SW, Sunil Rao J, Eberhart CG, Grajkowska W, Gillespie Y, Lach B, Grundy R, Pollack IF, Hamilton RL, Van Meter T, Carlotti CG, Boop F, Bigner D, Gilbertson RJ, Rutka JT, Taylor MD (2009) Multiple recurrent genetic events converge on control of histone lysine methylation in medulloblastoma. Nat Genet 41(4):465–472. doi:10.1038/ng.336 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Noushmehr H, Weisenberger DJ, Diefes K, Phillips HS, Pujara K, Berman BP, Pan F, Pelloski CE, Sulman EP, Bhat KP, Verhaak RG, Hoadley KA, Hayes DN, Perou CM, Schmidt HK, Ding L, Wilson RK, Van Den Berg D, Shen H, Bengtsson H, Neuvial P, Cope LM, Buckley J, Herman JG, Baylin SB, Laird PW, Aldape K (2010) Identification of a CpG island methylator phenotype that defines a distinct subgroup of glioma. Cancer Cell 17(5):510–522. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2010.03.017 PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Ohgaki H, Kleihues P (2011) Genetic profile of astrocytic and oligodendroglial gliomas. Brain Tumor Pathol 28(3):177–183. doi:10.1007/s10014-011-0029-1 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Parsons DW, Jones S, Zhang X, Lin JC, Leary RJ, Angenendt P, Mankoo P, Carter H, Siu IM, Gallia GL, Olivi A, McLendon R, Rasheed BA, Keir S, Nikolskaya T, Nikolsky Y, Busam DA, Tekleab H, Diaz LA Jr, Hartigan J, Smith DR, Strausberg RL, Marie SK, Shinjo SM, Yan H, Riggins GJ, Bigner DD, Karchin R, Papadopoulos N, Parmigiani G, Vogelstein B, Velculescu VE, Kinzler KW (2008) An integrated genomic analysis of human glioblastoma multiforme. Science 321(5897):1807–1812. doi:10.1126/science.1164382 PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Paugh BS, Broniscer A, Qu C, Miller CP, Zhang J, Tatevossian RG, Olson JM, Geyer JR, Chi SN, da Silva NS, Onar-Thomas A, Baker JN, Gajjar A, Ellison DW, Baker SJ (2011) Genome-wide analyses identify recurrent amplifications of receptor tyrosine kinases and cell-cycle regulatory genes in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. J Clin Oncol 29(30):3999–4006. doi:10.1200/JCO.2011.35.5677 PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Paugh BS, Qu C, Jones C, Liu Z, Adamowicz-Brice M, Zhang J, Bax DA, Coyle B, Barrow J, Hargrave D, Lowe J, Gajjar A, Zhao W, Broniscer A, Ellison DW, Grundy RG, Baker SJ (2010) Integrated molecular genetic profiling of pediatric high-grade gliomas reveals key differences with the adult disease. J Clin Oncol 28(18):3061–3068. doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.26.7252 PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Pollack IF, Hamilton RL, Sobol RW, Nikiforova MN, Lyons-Weiler MA, LaFramboise WA, Burger PC, Brat DJ, Rosenblum MK, Holmes EJ, Zhou T, Jakacki RI (2011) IDH1 mutations are common in malignant gliomas arising in adolescents: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. Child’s Nerv Syst 27(1):87–94. doi:10.1007/s00381-010-1264-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Qu HQ, Jacob K, Fatet S, Ge B, Barnett D, Delattre O, Faury D, Montpetit A, Solomon L, Hauser P, Garami M, Bognar L, Hansely Z, Mio R, Farmer JP, Albrecht S, Polychronakos C, Hawkins C, Jabado N (2010) Genome-wide profiling using single-nucleotide polymorphism arrays identifies novel chromosomal imbalances in pediatric glioblastomas. Neuro Oncol 12(2):153–163. doi:10.1093/neuonc/nop001 PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Robinson G, Parker M, Kranenburg TA, Lu C, Chen X, Ding L, Phoenix TN, Hedlund E, Wei L, Zhu X, Chalhoub N, Baker SJ, Huether R, Kriwacki R, Curley N, Thiruvenkatam R, Wang J, Wu G, Rusch M, Hong X, Becksfort J, Gupta P, Ma J, Easton J, Vadodaria B, Onar-Thomas A, Lin T, Li S, Pounds S, Paugh S, Zhao D, Kawauchi D, Roussel MF, Finkelstein D, Ellison DW, Lau CC, Bouffet E, Hassall T, Gururangan S, Cohn R, Fulton RS, Fulton LL, Dooling DJ, Ochoa K, Gajjar A, Mardis ER, Wilson RK, Downing JR, Zhang J, Gilbertson RJ (2012) Novel mutations target distinct subgroups of medulloblastoma. Nature 488(7409):43–48. doi:10.1038/nature11213 PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Saratsis AM, Kambhampati M, Snyder K, Yadavilli S, Devaney JM, Harmon B, Hall J, Raabe EH, An P, Weingart M, Rood BR, Magge SN, MacDonald TJ, Packer RJ, Nazarian J (2014) Comparative multidimensional molecular analyses of pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma reveals distinct molecular subtypes. Acta Neuropathol 127(6):881–895. doi:10.1007/s00401-013-1218-2 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Sasaki M, Knobbe CB, Munger JC, Lind EF, Brenner D, Brustle A, Harris IS, Holmes R, Wakeham A, Haight J, You-Ten A, Li WY, Schalm S, Su SM, Virtanen C, Reifenberger G, Ohashi PS, Barber DL, Figueroa ME, Melnick A, Zuniga-Pflucker JC, Mak TW (2012) IDH1(R132H) mutation increases murine haematopoietic progenitors and alters epigenetics. Nature 488(7413):656–659. doi:10.1038/nature11323 PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Schwalbe EC, Williamson D, Lindsey JC, Hamilton D, Ryan SL, Megahed H, Garami M, Hauser P, Dembowska-Baginska B, Perek D, Northcott PA, Taylor MD, Taylor RE, Ellison DW, Bailey S, Clifford SC (2013) DNA methylation profiling of medulloblastoma allows robust subclassification and improved outcome prediction using formalin-fixed biopsies. Acta Neuropathol 125(3):359–371. doi:10.1007/s00401-012-1077-2 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Schwartzentruber J, Korshunov A, Liu XY, Jones DT, Pfaff E, Jacob K, Sturm D, Fontebasso AM, Quang DA, Tonjes M, Hovestadt V, Albrecht S, Kool M, Nantel A, Konermann C, Lindroth A, Jager N, Rausch T, Ryzhova M, Korbel JO, Hielscher T, Hauser P, Garami M, Klekner A, Bognar L, Ebinger M, Schuhmann MU, Scheurlen W, Pekrun A, Fruhwald MC, Roggendorf W, Kramm C, Durken M, Atkinson J, Lepage P, Montpetit A, Zakrzewska M, Zakrzewski K, Liberski PP, Dong Z, Siegel P, Kulozik AE, Zapatka M, Guha A, Malkin D, Felsberg J, Reifenberger G, von Deimling A, Ichimura K, Collins VP, Witt H, Milde T, Witt O, Zhang C, Castelo-Branco P, Lichter P, Faury D, Tabori U, Plass C, Majewski J, Pfister SM, Jabado N (2012) Driver mutations in histone H3.3 and chromatin remodelling genes in paediatric glioblastoma. Nature 482(7384):226–231. doi:10.1038/nature10833 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Shore EM, Xu M, Feldman GJ, Fenstermacher DA, Cho TJ, Choi IH, Connor JM, Delai P, Glaser DL, LeMerrer M, Morhart R, Rogers JG, Smith R, Triffitt JT, Urtizberea JA, Zasloff M, Brown MA, Kaplan FS (2006) A recurrent mutation in the BMP type I receptor ACVR1 causes inherited and sporadic fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Nat Genet 38(5):525–527. doi:10.1038/ng1783 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Sturm D, Bender S, Jones DT, Lichter P, Grill J, Becher O, Hawkins C, Majewski J, Jones C, Costello JF, Iavarone A, Aldape K, Brennan CW, Jabado N, Pfister SM (2014) Paediatric and adult glioblastoma: multiform (epi)genomic culprits emerge. Nat Rev Cancer 14(2):92–107. doi:10.1038/nrc3655 PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Sturm D, Witt H, Hovestadt V, Khuong-Quang DA, Jones DT, Konermann C, Pfaff E, Tonjes M, Sill M, Bender S, Kool M, Zapatka M, Becker N, Zucknick M, Hielscher T, Liu XY, Fontebasso AM, Ryzhova M, Albrecht S, Jacob K, Wolter M, Ebinger M, Schuhmann MU, van Meter T, Fruhwald MC, Hauch H, Pekrun A, Radlwimmer B, Niehues T, von Komorowski G, Durken M, Kulozik AE, Madden J, Donson A, Foreman NK, Drissi R, Fouladi M, Scheurlen W, von Deimling A, Monoranu C, Roggendorf W, Herold-Mende C, Unterberg A, Kramm CM, Felsberg J, Hartmann C, Wiestler B, Wick W, Milde T, Witt O, Lindroth AM, Schwartzentruber J, Faury D, Fleming A, Zakrzewska M, Liberski PP, Zakrzewski K, Hauser P, Garami M, Klekner A, Bognar L, Morrissy S, Cavalli F, Taylor MD, van Sluis P, Koster J, Versteeg R, Volckmann R, Mikkelsen T, Aldape K, Reifenberger G, Collins VP, Majewski J, Korshunov A, Lichter P, Plass C, Jabado N, Pfister SM (2012) Hotspot mutations in H3F3A and IDH1 define distinct epigenetic and biological subgroups of glioblastoma. Cancer Cell 22(4):425–437. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2012.08.024 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Taylor KR, Mackay A, Truffaux N, Butterfield YS, Morozova O, Philippe C, Castel D, Grasso CS, Vinci M, Carvalho D, Carcaboso AM, de Torres C, Cruz O, Mora J, Entz-Werle N, Ingram WJ, Monje M, Hargrave D, Bullock AN, Puget S, Yip S, Jones C, Grill J (2014) Recurrent activating ACVR1 mutations in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. Nat Genet 46(5):457–461. doi:10.1038/ng.2925 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Turcan S, Rohle D, Goenka A, Walsh LA, Fang F, Yilmaz E, Campos C, Fabius AW, Lu C, Ward PS, Thompson CB, Kaufman A, Guryanova O, Levine R, Heguy A, Viale A, Morris LG, Huse JT, Mellinghoff IK, Chan TA (2012) IDH1 mutation is sufficient to establish the glioma hypermethylator phenotype. Nature 483(7390):479–483. doi:10.1038/nature10866 PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Valera ET, de Freitas Cortez MA, de Paula Queiroz RG, de Oliveira FM, Brassesco MS, Jabado N, Faury D, Bobola MS, Machado HR, Scrideli CA, Tone LG (2009) Pediatric glioblastoma cell line shows different patterns of expression of transmembrane ABC transporters after in vitro exposure to vinblastine. Childs Nerv Syst 25(1):39–45. doi:10.1007/s00381-008-0740-3 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Varela I, Tarpey P, Raine K, Huang D, Ong CK, Stephens P, Davies H, Jones D, Lin ML, Teague J, Bignell G, Butler A, Cho J, Dalgliesh GL, Galappaththige D, Greenman C, Hardy C, Jia M, Latimer C, Lau KW, Marshall J, McLaren S, Menzies A, Mudie L, Stebbings L, Largaespada DA, Wessels LF, Richard S, Kahnoski RJ, Anema J, Tuveson DA, Perez-Mancera PA, Mustonen V, Fischer A, Adams DJ, Rust A, Chan-on W, Subimerb C, Dykema K, Furge K, Campbell PJ, Teh BT, Stratton MR, Futreal PA (2011) Exome sequencing identifies frequent mutation of the SWI/SNF complex gene PBRM1 in renal carcinoma. Nature 469(7331):539–542. doi:10.1038/nature09639 PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Venneti S, Garimella MT, Sullivan LM, Martinez D, Huse JT, Heguy A, Santi M, Thompson CB, Judkins AR (2013) Evaluation of histone 3 lysine 27 trimethylation (H3K27me3) and enhancer of Zest 2 (EZH2) in pediatric glial and glioneuronal tumors shows decreased H3K27me3 in H3F3A K27M mutant glioblastomas. Brain Pathol 23(5):558–564. doi:10.1111/bpa.12042 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Verhaak RG, Hoadley KA, Purdom E, Wang V, Qi Y, Wilkerson MD, Miller CR, Ding L, Golub T, Mesirov JP, Alexe G, Lawrence M, O’Kelly M, Tamayo P, Weir BA, Gabriel S, Winckler W, Gupta S, Jakkula L, Feiler HS, Hodgson JG, James CD, Sarkaria JN, Brennan C, Kahn A, Spellman PT, Wilson RK, Speed TP, Gray JW, Meyerson M, Getz G, Perou CM, Hayes DN (2010) Integrated genomic analysis identifies clinically relevant subtypes of glioblastoma characterized by abnormalities in PDGFRA, IDH1, EGFR, and NF1. Cancer Cell 17(1):98–110. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2009.12.020 PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Ward E, DeSantis C, Robbins A, Kohler B, Jemal A (2014) Childhood and adolescent cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin 64(2):83–103. doi:10.3322/caac.21219 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Weller M, Felsberg J, Hartmann C, Berger H, Steinbach JP, Schramm J, Westphal M, Schackert G, Simon M, Tonn JC, Heese O, Krex D, Nikkhah G, Pietsch T, Wiestler O, Reifenberger G, von Deimling A, Loeffler M (2009) Molecular predictors of progression-free and overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a prospective translational study of the German Glioma Network. J Clin Oncol 27(34):5743–5750. doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.23.0805 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Wu G, Broniscer A, McEachron TA, Lu C, Paugh BS, Becksfort J, Qu C, Ding L, Huether R, Parker M, Zhang J, Gajjar A, Dyer MA, Mullighan CG, Gilbertson RJ, Mardis ER, Wilson RK, Downing JR, Ellison DW, Zhang J, Baker SJ (2012) Somatic histone H3 alterations in pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas and non-brainstem glioblastomas. Nat Genet 44(3):251–253. doi:10.1038/ng.1102 PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Wu G, Diaz AK, Paugh BS, Rankin SL, Ju B, Li Y, Zhu X, Qu C, Chen X, Zhang J, Easton J, Edmonson M, Ma X, Lu C, Nagahawatte P, Hedlund E, Rusch M, Pounds S, Lin T, Onar-Thomas A, Huether R, Kriwacki R, Parker M, Gupta P, Becksfort J, Wei L, Mulder HL, Boggs K, Vadodaria B, Yergeau D, Russell JC, Ochoa K, Fulton RS, Fulton LL, Jones C, Boop FA, Broniscer A, Wetmore C, Gajjar A, Ding L, Mardis ER, Wilson RK, Taylor MR, Downing JR, Ellison DW, Zhang J, Baker SJ (2014) The genomic landscape of diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma and pediatric non-brainstem high-grade glioma. Nat Genet 46(5):444–450. doi:10.1038/ng.2938 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Xu W, Yang H, Liu Y, Yang Y, Wang P, Kim SH, Ito S, Yang C, Wang P, Xiao MT, Liu LX, Jiang WQ, Liu J, Zhang JY, Wang B, Frye S, Zhang Y, Xu YH, Lei QY, Guan KL, Zhao SM, Xiong Y (2011) Oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate is a competitive inhibitor of alpha-ketoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases. Cancer Cell 19(1):17–30. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2010.12.014 PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Yan H, Parsons DW, Jin G, McLendon R, Rasheed BA, Yuan W, Kos I, Batinic-Haberle I, Jones S, Riggins GJ, Friedman H, Friedman A, Reardon D, Herndon J, Kinzler KW, Velculescu VE, Vogelstein B, Bigner DD (2009) IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in gliomas. N Engl J Med 360(8):765–773. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0808710 PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Zarghooni M, Bartels U, Lee E, Buczkowicz P, Morrison A, Huang A, Bouffet E, Hawkins C (2010) Whole-genome profiling of pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas highlights platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase as potential therapeutic targets. J Clin Oncol 28(8):1337–1344. doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.25.5463 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Zhu X, He F, Zeng H, Ling S, Chen A, Wang Y, Yan X, Wei W, Pang Y, Cheng H, Hua C, Zhang Y, Yang X, Lu X, Cao L, Hao L, Dong L, Zou W, Wu J, Li X, Zheng S, Yan J, Zhou J, Zhang L, Mi S, Wang X, Zhang L, Zou Y, Chen Y, Geng Z, Wang J, Zhou J, Liu X, Wang J, Yuan W, Huang G, Cheng T, Wang QF (2014) Identification of functional cooperative mutations of SETD2 in human acute leukemia. Nat Genet 46(3):287–293. doi:10.1038/ng.2894 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2014

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adam M. Fontebasso
    • 1
  • Tenzin Gayden
    • 2
  • Hamid Nikbakht
    • 2
  • Michael Neirinck
    • 1
  • Simon Papillon-Cavanagh
    • 2
  • Jacek Majewski
    • 2
  • Nada Jabado
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Experimental Medicine, Montreal Children’s HospitalMcGill University and McGill University Health CentreMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Department of Human GeneticsMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations